Roosterton

[quote name='King Xander the Only' timestamp='1297395514' post='2628811'] I thoroughly enjoyed my wars. Best of luck to you in the future. [/quote] It was fun.

[quote name='rsoxbronco1' timestamp='1297121284' post='2624646'] Quite the thread. Your entire alliance boils down to nothing but, [img]http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/1058/itrollur.png[/img] [/quote] Posting to say that I will [b]not[/b] dispute this. At least we have fun doing it. (Honestly though, we're just like this in public. Our community isn't that bad. Really. )

[quote name='Lord Panda' timestamp='1297066906' post='2623830'] Please do, you could join the entire section we have devoted to trolling the OWF. 8D [/quote] We have a section?!? I thought everyone OWF-trolled! [quote name='Lamuella' timestamp='1297086569' post='2623959'] They don't hate you. It's just that you posted a fairly pointless self-aggrandizing backslap about an event of frankly limited significance. Making a propaganda piece about this would have been fun. Making an alliance announcement made you look like pipsqueaks, and in a war like this the pips get squeaked. [/quote] We are 13 people. A pipsqueak is something small. Thus we have every right to act like pipsqueaks. Like I said, it's the people outright calling us "pathetic" who I was referring to.

[quote name='bobo t baggins' timestamp='1297034744' post='2622840'] yeah. waves in a puddle. oh, and perhaps you should follow the conversation a bit better? re: the tissue comment was CLEARLY directed elsewhere, thus the quote above it. is it your first day on the internets? [/quote] You don't know what you've just gotten into with LP... Seriously. Ask Ivan Moldavi.

Damn. For a second there I actually thought you had 6mil infra.

[quote name='Malkavias' timestamp='1297017649' post='2622375'] Rather well actually. Still have 6000k infra, but a 4 on 1 war where you are at an extreme tech and land disadvantage with most of your opponents is not one expect to end well for you. [/quote] Isn't 6000k 6 million? Oh god, now I'm trolling my alliance mates...

[quote name='bobo t baggins' timestamp='1296980762' post='2621860'] as for that oh, so amusing bit at the top there... about so many people hating you and such... you 57th guys sure do mistake people making fun of you and laughing at your expense for hate an awful lot. [/quote] Oh, yes, I have nothing wrong with people laughing at our expense. I quite enjoy that, actually. I was mainly referring to you and Rush, who seem to think we're pathetic and arrogant for posting a thread about our first ZI. Which is a perfectly valid wartime milestone for a 13-man alliance.

I just love how so many people hate us within 30 days of our reformation. It's pretty cute to be honest. Bobo; I'm sorry. Did you even exist during the GLOF war? I don't seem to have any recollection of how you were involved, and what gives you the right to post a generic meme about tears. Or is your post of tears really stealth-tears of your own, because you're pissed off at the fact that a 13 man AA on the other side of the war is actually enjoying themselves? If this is indeed the case; Lolnoob, your tears fuel my ship, etc etc.

[quote name='Lamuella' timestamp='1296935636' post='2620829'] oh great, we're at the smug peeing contest stage of the war where everyone tries to drag up the supposed problems in their opponent's nation building strategy. Can't wait for the swapping of ground attack screenshots. That's where the fun really starts. [/quote] On that note. [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ]Xander got pwned.[/url]

Well, it was the new 57th's first ever ZI. That's a milestone. What makes it any less valid than alliances posting announcements for, say, reaching 1mil NS? Since we surely won't be reaching 1mil NS while throwing ourselves at you lot, we might as well look towards other achievments.

Seeing as how I'm probably the first 57th Overlander who will get ZI'ed, do I get a thread too? And maybe a banner which says "First defensive ZI?" Hold strong, my little 353 infra.

[quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1296865190' post='2619659'] Oh, so repeatedly saying "MK are hypocrites" in literally every situation regardless of context is fine, but saying (according to your definition) ~generic memes~ is wrong? This feels so, wait for it, [i]hypocritical[/i]. As for your "oh no I can't have an opinion," read my earlier posts again. I said a CB is an objective term for a "reason for a war." A CB is always valid, you cannot hold an opinion on how valid a CB is. The fact there is a war confirms the validity of the CB as the only invalid CB is one that doesn't result in a war. Final two sentences make very little sense and seem to be going for the melodramatic angle rather than the 'content' angle. I'm not really too sure what you're trying to achieve there. [/quote] Yes, it is wrong. Because posting "MK is hypocrites" actually has something to do with the situation at hand, and a reasonable related response can be made to it. Accusing someone of "tears" is an uncreative meme which has been around for at least two years. Yes, I can hold an opinion on how valid a CB is. Your CB is !@#$%^&*. There, I just had an opinion on it. You might still go to war anyway, but I still think it's !@#$%^&*. The reason for my last two sentences were in relation to the "You can't hold an opinion, we're better than you" part. The old NPO didn't seem to care so much about this, and it was pretty well known that lots of people hated them. But you don't even seem to be willing to accept that, now that it applies in a similar sense to you.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1296361846' post='2610365'] Are you sure you can handle 57th? I mean don't wanna overstretch things, there. [/quote] *Chuckles uncontrollably.

[quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1296853978' post='2619503'] D34th's generic argument: "MK, you are hypocrites." Now, an intelligent discussion would generally have [i]something[/i] to do with the situation at hand, however Mr D34th has yet again failed to read the situation and failed to respond to our points. Instead he has tried to interpret the situation to accuse us of being hypocrites (which, as has been pointed out extensively to him, there is no basis for), pointing to his sigs (which have no relevance). Unless 'posting' is considered 'intelligent' (it isn't) then I hardly see how that can be the case. [/quote] It's a hell of a lot better than posting generic memes. And just like your alliance is saying that, in their opinion, they have a perfectly valid CB, can't I say that my support of what D34th was saying is an opinion? Or are only the almighty Doomhouse allowed to hold opinions now? At least the old NPO wasn't deluded into thinking that they could convince everyone to love them.

[quote name='mrwuss' timestamp='1296836877' post='2619324'] Hah, stop making things up as you go. [/quote] You are hilariously clever, man. I bend to the greatness of you and your wittiness.