Poyplemonkeys
-
Posts
1,708 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Poyplemonkeys
-
-
Yeah, pretty much in a similar way to \m/ disbanding of their own accord.
After dealing with your constant !@#$ trying to wind up Nemesis members who used to be in LoSS on our boards I can safely say you deserve anything LoSS throws at you, and I'm personally hoping it's a nuke. -
You are so full of !@#$ Krunk. The way you continue to try and provoke LoSS over your butthurt at being kicked to the curb is pathetic.
-
You told SpiderJ that you'd always wanted to go rogue on Kuru without realising who SpiderJ was? That is sublime
I've never spoken to you, but always admired your posting from afar, stick around some 
-
I, well, I'm not sure what you're trying to suggest with that information...
-
Oh that was a knee slapper, were you not up for the funniest member award?
-
Let's save confusion.
-
Pretty sure most of these great members MK have 'recruited' have gone straight from their old alliance to Mushroom Kingdom. Which raises questions about when these recruiters did their recruiting...
-
This is why we can't have nice things
-
[quote name='Believland' timestamp='1294867393' post='2573400']
Trust me slime, you don't want treaties to be activated.
[/quote]
Oh so your magical treaty exists again now does it? -
[quote name='WCaesarD' timestamp='1294448233' post='2567881']
I could be mistaken in my understanding, but I always assumed the 200 member limit was a way to contribute to player retention and recruitment in the overall game. I see people complaining frequently about lower numbers of players, well, if you want a sanction, go recruit some more players. I don't see any reason to remove it, in fact, I would argue for it to go higher, as opposed to lower.
[/quote]
This post from the AsR pretty much sums up what I think about it. Perhaps the amount of score 1 nation gets you should be increased to stop people saying 'but they're in 19th!!!' seeing as score is a pretty arbitrary calculation that really doesn't mean jack when it comes down to it anyway. -
[quote name='Arrnea' timestamp='1294753090' post='2571942']
This. Also the SOS Brigade has no intention of pursuing any spy attacks of which the perpetrators' identities were not uncovered.
Edit: Yes, I'm talking to you, Poyplemonkeys.
[/quote]
Why are you talking to me about spy attacks of which the perpetrators' identities were not uncovered? I have no interest in those... -
Let's be fair, some more destructive missions were attempted too according to the failed spy attacks list. Who knows what number of successful spy missions were done that they can't pin on SLCB too?
-
I tried to provoke tensions between two alliances so that a war might break out and we might be able to have some fun with that. Seems I got caught because my spies were more interested in cigars and beautiful women than the task at hand so I guess there won't be a war... Sorry guys
-
I resent the implication that I would do anything to help such an immoral grouping as SLCB.
-
[quote name='Trikoupis' timestamp='1294738843' post='2571877']
Uh?
Feel free to elaborate.
[/quote]
You should either learn what the negative connotations of the term 'Hegemony' mean to people on Planet Bob, and realise it's not in game spy attacks, or just stop ignoring said connotations so you can push one of the worst pieces of propaganda I've seen in my time in the Cyberverse. -
[quote name='Trikoupis' timestamp='1294735168' post='2571858']
I like how people still try to refute the term [i]New Hegemony[/i].
Still not convinced?
[/quote]
Oh dear. I really don't know what more to say about this claim than just oh dear. Go take some history lessons son. -
Have never heard of Hooligans...
-
The fruits of their labour seem to be a hilarious reaction from you and not much else behind the tears. Good harvest this season SLCB
-
[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1294623736' post='2570548']
Their cancellation on Nemesis is the stuff of legend [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/awesome.gif[/img]
[/quote]
Which one?
-
When both sides seem fairly happy that a treaty is gone I guess it shows this up to be the right decision.
I don't really understand the 'we're allied to Fark so there was nothing we could do, even if we wanted to' line of reasoning for not staying out of the war. I realise you weren't obligated to defend NEW, and I'm not going to get into whether you should have done, but I just take issue with that line of reasoning so say that you couldn't even if you'd wanted to. There was more than one alliance attacking NEW, and Fark had already shown it didn't mind to much if treaty/coalition partners of an ally were attacked if the situation called for it... -
[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1294621078' post='2570451']
Yes, facts are completely irrelevant [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/PsyduckEmot.gif[/img]
[/quote]
I have 8,612.20 tech. Please inform me how this fact is relevant... -
Yeah casualties are definitely the best way to measure what a man you are. Not like one nuke at his level would take him above 80% of the Cyberverse or anything. Definitely a relevant statistic.
-
-
Guess I was wrong...
Alliance believes in stealing money.
in World Affairs (IC)
Posted · Edited by Poyplemonkeys
Because Krunk's constant attempts to sling mud at LoSS, particularly certain members of LoSS, are all part of the ongoing witch hunt against him of course. A witch hunt that must be stopped before it goes too far and tech deals are actually reneged on or, heaven forbid, trades are cancelled!
Never thought I'd call someone a poor man's Penkala, but hey ho, it is what it is.