Son of Taeper
-
Posts
234 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Son of Taeper
-
-
[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1286982423' post='2483616']
Tom, you cannot argue with idiocy because the idiot will beat you with experience.
[/quote]
I suggest you listen to Paul here Tom as he is obviously an expert. -
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1286982310' post='2483614']
It is clear to all (or at least all except you) that the game mechanics make your claim impossible.
And I quote:
Would you like me to do the math for you or are you able to do it yourself?
[/quote]
You must be correct then my friend but the stats show you had 3148 higher ns on the same day you declared on that nation.
So let me get this straight. It's possible for me to declare on a nation 700 ns lower than myself, but not possible for you to declare on a nation 3148 lower than yourself. ?
The charts show otherwise my friend so the only conclusion I can come to is that not content with stomping a nation, you decided to zoom far out of his reach immediately after your stomp.
Try this-
In order to hit that nation you had to either be twice his size and then zoom, or lower than his size and then do a huge zoom
So in answer to your question, yes please, can you show us all the maths that allowed you to attack that nation on that day. ? You had to be around twice his size (4602 NS) and gain 847 NS on him which pales my 700 difference a bit. (and that assumes I was 700 higher on my dec date.
You have 3148 to account for please as you did offer to do the maths for us
-
That link appears to be a reply to someone else's post my friend.
I was replying to your post which may have been a reason that I quoted your post and not someone else's post.
It was you that brought up the stomping issue so you need to defend it.
On the 2nd point, it is clear to all that take the time to look that you declared on 9/15 with an NS of 5449 on a nation with 2301
That is a wicked difference and you should be ashamed of yourself accusing another nation of stomping. -
[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1286916476' post='2482787']
Number of Soldiers Lost in All Wars. 47,730 Attacking + 48,329 Defending = 96,059 Casualties
Casualty Rank: Ranked #13 of 1,488 Nations (0.87%)
I think this speaks volumes as to how I and OP fight. Sadly I won't be getting any casualties from you.
[/quote]
Anyone else and I would gladly fight, but your self confessed hatred of me leads me to turtle on you.
That would be my first turtle in 12 rounds so you should consider it an honor.
Your published casualty rank leads me to think you feel more for your stats than you do for your alliance. -
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1286915009' post='2482766']
It is always telling when someone posts post-attack NS's for nations that have lost hundreds of NS in the initial attacks and the attacker gained a bunch of tech and land.
And SoT, I was looking at your last war, this one....
It seems that, based on the nation charts, your NS was about 2,000 and MIGSAM was at about 1,300.
Something about throwing stones and glass houses?
[/quote]
2675 to 3921 NS jump is rather a hefty boost for just tech and land in one day. 5 day collection may have helped an OP member a bit perhaps?
My last fight was not a war I'm afraid, it is clearly marked as "LE Defence" and there was clearly no zoom involved.
On the subject though, and only because you brought the subject up, your dec on Yandistan of Destructor Fleets looks impressive
9/152010
CowboyTX -NS 5449
declares on
Yandistan -NS 2301
3148 NS difference
That is thousands and not hundreds.
I wasn't even aware it was possible for a 5449 nation to declare on a nation that low.
Stay classy
What were you saying about stones and glass houses again? -
[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1286908390' post='2482658']
Once again you read too much into things, I wouldn't fire a nuke at your nation. My attack on you was personal becasue I don't like you, look at my wars and see that my other 2 wars were against nations larger than myself, once again you only highlight things that make your point.
[/quote]
I know you don't like me so there is no need to post it.
Hardly reading too much into it is it when you attack me.
Whoops, I seemed to have highlighted your self confirmed hatred of me.
Should I highlight something that makes no point at all?
***Thinks***
There were 28 stock emotions on my sidebar.
I used one in my post but there are still 28 in the sidebar.
Does that mean I didn't lol1.?
Don't read too much into it my friend, its a pointless comment I made and it will keep you up all night try to figure the answer.
Edit-
Walking Eye NS 2,527.779
The Bulgarian Empire NS 2,412.471
Paulinca NS 3,920.604
Yep, they look mighty larger than yourself -
[quote name='Jarhead' timestamp='1286879715' post='2482227']
*sigh, I gave up on the first place...
dam you turtles! fight back!!
[size="1"]so i can beat clash....[/size]
[/quote]
I never did get my head around the casualties race over the last 3 rounds.
I managed to get a guy to point a nuke at me this round which should pop off at reset. That's good right?
Then to mess his plans up I just turtle right?
Then I win? -
[quote name='Schad' timestamp='1286674224' post='2480041']
Not taking sides on the rest of it, but I can vouch for this...Paul made sure that we found room in our counters for an OP nation who had ignored orders and stayed out of the fight.
As for LE flag-running, well...I'll believe that when I see it. Have fun blowing things up!
[/quote]
Well someone sure thinks I'm a flag runner.
**********************************
Date Declared By Declared On
Actions
10/11/2010 3:35:13 PM
Paulinca
Ruler: paul711
Ordo Paradoxia
Son of Taeper
Ruler: Son of Taeper
Lafayette Escadrille
********************************
Ruler: paul711
Nation Name: Paulinca
Last Activity: 10/11/2010 2:38:36 PM (1 Days Inactive)
Alliance Affiliation: Ordo Paradoxia
Improvements:
Barracks: 1, Guerrilla Camps: 5, Harbors: 1, Intelligence Agencies: 2
National Wonders:
Disaster Relief Agency, Hidden Nuclear Missile Silo, Pentagon
Senate Votes: 0 Votes (Senate Votes Allowed)
_:. Military Information
Nation Rank: Ranked #90 of 1,489 Nations (6.04%)
Nation Strength: 3,920.604 (My nation strength is: 1,505.803)
Nuclear Weapons: 1
*****************************
Wonder where that nuke is going.
-
[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1286725748' post='2480412']
WOW I thought it was only coincidental but you really do read too much into things. Why would we bait you? As was the case in the past you really don't know as much as you think you know. We know more than you give us credit for.
[/quote]
Another round but the same old Paul.
You really need to give it a rest for a while, but of course, you know that (or at least you say you do)
How about you just get off my back a while as you are beginning to bore me.
Next round you can come in fresh but I dare say you will bring the same attitude with you. -
[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1286716710' post='2480357']
Come now, Taper, you can come up with something more clever than that.
[/quote]
True but bait is never a good thing and I find the best way to defend against it is to throw the question back.
Strange you answer for him though. -
[quote name='Ferrie' timestamp='1286711827' post='2480332']
No sir, I dont. Thats why we both have these awesome sigs.
[/quote]
Hey, we have the same sig Ferrie, how lucky is that?
I'm surprised no one else picked up on it.
We appear to almost have a squad fighting under the same alliance name. -
Thanks Grog.
I'll keep intel on you closer my chest but am happy to send it on request.
In the meantime, it's close to Wassail season so you might care to iron your handkerchief and sing for it. -
[quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1286604502' post='2479481']
No, DR and OP DoW'd RD and PS, not PS, RD, and LE, or PS and LE. Therefor, you're asking an uninvolved party for help, when this is pretty much a dead even fight and no one has interfered until now.
But you know, if you can't take the heat, Get out of the kitchen my dear friend.
It's fine if you can't fight your fights alone. Just don't cry when you get called out for it.
Oh, and I honestly don't care, I just find it funny that you're Defending the Act.
It Is What It Is.
Confusion.
[/quote]
If my memory serves me OP DoW'd on LE a while back but not on LE Cadet. They did find space for one member of Cadet though (without a DoW) and defended the action by saying that member was not a specific target and was hit by a guy that was not an OP member.
Now, the guy was flying OP colors so it was assumed that he was an OP member but Cadet was assured by OP that he was not a member, but an applicant.
If he were an applicant I would call that outside help. -
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1286664569' post='2479921']
Do you speak for SoT?
[/quote]
Do you speak for Paul -
[quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1286659835' post='2479863']
You're typing and not attacking...
[/quote] Looks like a plan to me. -
And as I said, some nations are not as they seem but I appear to have touched a nerve there
-
[quote name='Mistress Demona' timestamp='1286653724' post='2479800']
On behalf of The Flying Kiwis, we are honored that Lafayette Escadrille considers some of our members worthy of their attention.
Kiwis...take flight
[/quote]
The Flying Kiwis are a fine alliance for sure imo. -
[quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1286646767' post='2479742']
Is it the same thing I'm seeing [url=http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1000559]here[/url] and [url=http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1000726&Extended=0]here[/url]?
Confusion.
[/quote]
The second one for sure.
Edit - No, I think we are looking at different things.
I need to get back to one of our guys so excuse me if I miss the bait -
[quote name='lonewolfe2015' timestamp='1286644677' post='2479732']
Jiggly was my size when I hit him and at 14 days inactive, he's a justified target and then some.
But some people will always complain no matter the circumstances, especially end of round when people come and ruins the plans.
[/quote]
"Ruin the plans"
Interesting comment.
I wonder if you are seeing what I am. -
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1286641209' post='2479707']
http://tournament.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?search=1000066&Extended=1
Well, those 3 nations have not "jumped about through the round". And I hardly call being in 3 or 4 wars in the last week, actively engaged currently, eating and dishing out several nukes and having 46,383 Casualties "not as involved in Alliance wars as they could be". I thought that LE kind of frowned upon entering other AA's wars. Guess I was wrong.
Any hoo..... Have Fun!
[/quote]
Only 2 nations at war there and only 1 is OP.
Some could confuse OP and Duckroll but I see them as different alliances.
Current intel shows Jiggly is a justified target.
He knows why. -
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1286638992' post='2479686']
Interesting. LE is attacking nations who are already involved in an alliance wide war.
[/quote]
I think some of LE have some wars on the boil but not all of LE.
It has been noted that some nations are not as involved in Alliance wars as they could be, and also noted that some nations just jump about through the round.
Intel would suggest some nations are not as they seem. -
[quote name='Mikeyrox' timestamp='1286637387' post='2479671']
So your just going out and fighting whoever you get your hands on then? I like it
Have fun out there
[/quote]
Current nukes alone would take out every member of the alliance with the most members.
Combined NS, Infra tech etc is higher than any other alliance
Nowhere else to go I suppose. -
[quote name='the wompus' timestamp='1286631989' post='2479642']
Have fun LE.
This should certainly stir things up in the rankings!
[/quote]
It was an interesting dec for sure and with 112 LE nukes it's anyones guess which way it will go.
Sydney is the only Dec we have against us since the DoW which is strange as the TPC Dow was never against LE and the LE DoW was never against TPC.
TPC are fighting Superfriends if I read the TPC DoW right so I assume Sydney either lost the plot or felt brave.
Much respect to him and all the best to TPC and Superfriends. -
[quote name='Weezy' timestamp='1286500912' post='2478392']
Sorry broseph, you're gonna have to try a little bit harder than that. Remember, you're trying to recruit me, I'm not gonna come looking for you or your "details" you're supposed to supply them to me.
Edit: ***For future notice:"Expirenced" players are not a requirement....
[/quote]
That counts LE Cadet out then I suppose as you are offering little and expecting your squad mates to do the to do the chasing.
Lafayette Escadrille Declaration
in TE OWF Archive
Posted
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1286915009' post='2482766']
It is always telling when someone posts post-attack NS's for nations that have lost hundreds of NS in the initial attacks and the attacker gained a bunch of tech and land.
[/quote]
Well, your words, not mine. So you agree it is possible that the nation you attacked may have lost hundreds of NS after your attack.
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1286990885' post='2483689']
SoT, it is clear that the Cyber Nations Tournament Edition Information Index showed your claim to be inaccurate. And it obviously answered your other question(s) also.
[/quote]
http://tournament.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?searchstring=All&search=yand
http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display_charts.asp?Nation_ID=1000131
http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display_charts.asp?Nation_ID=1000764
I think that answers all the questions.
They are CNTE hyperlinks. Are you saying they are inaccurate? If so you should post a game bug -
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showforum=17
Surprised you never thought of posting the links, maybe you had a reason not to though.