Jump to content

Random

Members
  • Posts

    273
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Random

  1. This is what the cool kids are doing these days, I guess I'll jump on the boat too. If you get a 5 then it's because I don't know your alliance or the people in it well enough.

    TOP - 7 - They're not bad people, my alliance may have butt heads on some opinions but no reason to not like them

    MHA - 5 - Don't know them so 5 is default

    Sparta - 3 - You made the alliance because of the movie 300, I despise alliance theme's based on popular movies.

    NpO - 10.5 - These guys are so awesome they get a .5 higher since that's the cool thing to do

    IRON - 5

    ODN - 2 - Optional Defense Network, nuff said.

    FARK - 5

    GPA - 1 - What a waste of nations.

    NPO - 3 - I just don't like them and I never have.

    FOK - 5

    MK - 9 - These guys are awesome, plus they have Archon and Bros.

    WTF - 5

    TOOL - 5

    TDO - 1 - Neutral if I'm not mistaken, thus waste of nations/

    VE - 6 - I don't really know them but I liked them in the past

    Legion - 5

    RoK - 4 - Sorry but the name "Ragnarok" is so overused and overrated that you lost a point.

    GATO - 5

    CSN - 5

    Athens - 5

    Gremlins - 6 - Good people there

    MCXA - 4 - Never liked the alliance

    UPN - 5

    RIA - 5

    STA - 11

    Invicta - 5

    RnR - 5

    MASH - 5

    NADC - 5

    WAPA - 7 - Scottish Alliance, cool.

    NV - 8 - They have Hizzy, also they're cool

    NSO - 10 - They're awesome and they got Heft and Chron.

    NEW - 5

    MA - 5

    Umbrella - 5

    FAN - 5

    LoSS - 5

    TSO - 5

    NATO - 5

    Nordreich - 5

    GR - 8 - Always liked these guys, plus they were based off of NAAC if I'm not mistaken

    Vanguard - 8 - Awesome guys

    GOD - 5

    FoB - 5

    PC - 5

    Valhalla - 1 - Because of UJP war and noCB war

    GGA - 3 - They're GGA..

    TPF - 6 - Mhawk is a good guy so +1

  2. Blame Raydin, he had one of the exact figure, but he lost it somehow >_<

    Unacceptable. I hereby declare war on Skippy, my surrender terms are as follows

    1. Change your avatar to Adam West.

    2. Love STA moar.

    As both of these terms have been met I hereby grant you a white peace. :ph34r:

    ...

    ...

    ...

    Oh and grats on 500k onwards to 1 mil! o/

  3. It changes from time to time. We like to keep people on their toes.

    Things covered so far;

    -how to count votes

    -Tyga's talents as a shepherd

    -Haflinger's feelings on Grand Theft Auto

    -Wizards of the Coast (which apparently I'm not geeky enough to know... so screw it)

    -Whether or not a viceroy is the viceroy

    -the noCB war

    You forgot one.

    -Random's talents on being Tyga's sheep

  4. Two things come to my mind when viewing the OP and subsequent comments.

    1. While I don't particularly care about this incident, I can certainly understand why TAB would be upset. I tried to change Polar's name a few times. Had I succeeded I'd of been pretty upset to see Kernwaffen or Pius or some other original but long gone member reforming the The New Polar Order. By following the logic of most the replies here, it would be a valid thing to do though.

    1.a If TAB is still the same alliance that changed its name from BTA, then it is still the BTA. Just renamed. You can't have two BTAs.

    2. Sometimes alliances move beyond their original founder for good reasons. Master-Debater was a terrible leader, really. So to state that he has ownership of the BTA name when his only claim to fame was founding and failing it as opposed to TAB who is the successful heir... well it seems silly to me.

    Like I said, I have no claim in this and don't really care all that much, but the critisizm I see being handed to TAB seems a bit weak and reminds me of a dog-pile.

    I have to say that your #1 was a terrible comparison, neither Kernwaffen or Pius are the founders of NpO, it's Ivan but you knew that. MB is the founder of BTA so the fair comparison would be to say that you wouldn't want Ivan to reform the NpO had you succeeded in changing the name and to be honest I doubt you'd be annoyed or angry with Ivan had that actually ever happened. 1.a is just..well silly. If they're alliance name is not BTA then they are no longer BTA I honestly don't see how you can try to argue otherwise.

    Now for #2. I don't particularly care if MB was or wasn't a good leader but he founded BTA and if the alliance name isn't currently in use then why shouldn't he be able to remake BTA if he so chooses? TAB can't claim to be two alliances, that just doesn't work. They're either TAB or BTA and they clearly choose TAB, like others have said if they wanted to be BTA they would have changed their name back long ago.

  5. Which is funny, because of all these people you are complaining about, I actually attempted to ask you what you meant when it was clear I misunderstood it.

    I find Tyga's posts to always be pretty straight forward. It really does leave me staring when people actually miss the meaning in his words I still can't fathom how anybody could misunderstand him... :unsure:

  6. Just to clarify my position, I considered LJ Scott's comments to be his and his alone.

    The rest of my flock agree with me because they have no choice. :awesome:

    I respectfully disa---Jesus did you have to bite me? Okay fine.

    I am a sheep in Tyga's herd and as such he is almighty and all knowing, also he bites. :v:

  7. I find all of Chron's points to be pretty valid, and though it would have done better to have used quotes from other players instead of just Bob so people wouldn't be constantly saying that this is some type of grudge post it is easier to research one player then many.

×
×
  • Create New...