Jump to content

FreddieMercury

Members
  • Posts

    682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FreddieMercury

  1. [quote name='ComradeHitochi' date='26 April 2010 - 08:04 PM' timestamp='1272308658' post='2276224']
    VE never made an official announcement stating that their entire alliance was behind it. They had individual members[b] (albeit some are in govt)[/b] support it in this thread. As I am sure you do not speak for your whole alliance stating that you all condemn it (unless you announce it, with an alliance flag and all that good stuff, I take it to mean your alliance is not officially against it).
    [/quote]

    Oh hey there, I didn't even need to contradict you, you did it yourself. Goob job.


    [quote]
    I believe GGA said it best when they said [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=30714"]Proof = were bigger[/url]. Karmas a !@#$%* right? But hey you only agree with that saying sometimes.
    [/quote]

    You must have scraped hard on the bottom of the barrel there. Lets see: 1) that was about 2-3 years ago, 2) GGA has been couped twice since and doesn't look anywhere close to the GGA of the past 3) Karma war occurred 4) that was a pathetic attempt to create an excuse for wF to act like dicks.

  2. [quote]
    From the very beginning, TDO, our history has not been a peaceful one. You may recall how the founders of ADI left TDO, and why they did it. From there, we had quite a few problems, unable to cooperate, with ADI definitely agitating you. We even had to apologize because of a diplomat we sent to you, who turned out to not be very…diplomatic. And then, the final straw broke. According to our leadership, one of your members was harassing a new member of ADI.

    So how do we react? We threaten war. We threaten to attack an alliance that has only ever known neutrality, something that you have believed in since I was a member, and have since I left. That we even considered attacking you was, in retrospect, an obvious assault on ethics and values. That we would breach that trust of neutrality, when you did nothing to break it, was wrong. ADI should never have threatened to go to war.[/quote]

    Oh give me a !@#$@#$ break. Warbuck has made mistakes, sure, he's human.

    But this was not one of them. TDO's actions during this particular situation was utterly unacceptable. TDO's MoD was harassing your members trying to guilt them into quitting ADI, and TDO did nothing about it even after Warbuck tried days after days of diplomacy, if that wasn't a perfectly valid CB I don't know what is. This was still when you were buddy buddy with RoK, and they backed you up 100%.

    Now you're just digging up !@#$ on somebody who can't defend himself against these accusations, just so you can maybe score some brownie points with god knows who.

    Utterly pathetic. To think I once respected you guys.

  3. Could mean a couple of things

    1) Unconditional Surrender is a means for Ramirus to make IRON feel completely at his mercy, then let them off relatively lightly after messing with them for awhile thus inflating his own sadistic ego.

    2) I don't claim to know Ramirus all that well, in fact I've only interacted with him once. But damn, he came off as a psychopath that seemed completely capable of the utmost cruelties, and this is just a ruse to cripple IRON.

    I'm sure Ramirus wants to do #2, but I don't think he can even accomplish #1 with this volume of backlash here.

  4. [quote name='Mayzie' date='16 March 2010 - 04:58 PM' timestamp='1268755448' post='2227339']
    No really, it's ironic because both you and Michigans Own surrendered just a few days into the previous war, whining about your precious infra and now you're signing an optional defence pact with eachother. To anyone who isn't you or your protector, it's pretty damn hilarious.

    After fleeing your previous alliance, leaving former alliance members fighing after just two days of war, I doubt you're the right person to be spouting about honour, so give it a !@#$@#$ rest.
    [/quote]

    You speak as if WAPA was some honorable alliance that honored mutual defense over optional aggression and that it would be extremely disreputable to ditch an alliance of that caliber :rolleyes:

  5. [quote name='Newhotness' date='12 March 2010 - 04:29 AM' timestamp='1268368492' post='2222964']
    i never said i missed it. Reread my post. What i said was, from what i remember reading, i remember seeing people say they werent paying anything to Echelon. And that i dont remember anyone saying anything in regards to SBA. And then i went on to say that i dont remember everyones post exactly. So dont hold me to it, or make wild accusations like the one you just made about me trying to rewrite history

    aw, yup. you hit the nail on the head. couldnt have been a mistake by me. i was trying to spin it. sorry about that
    [/quote]

    Fair enough.

×
×
  • Create New...