Jump to content

Drai

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,199

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Drai

  1. Warchest poll

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    Greater than 2,000,000,000,000 but less than 3,000,000,000
    - should be $2 billion, not $2 trillion

    Greater than 5,000,000 but less than 10,000,000,000
    - should be $5 billion, not $5 million

    That said, I'm currently at my peak. Actually I just bought a moon mine a few days ago but I'll be at my peak again when I collect in 2 days. It's in the 5-10 bil range.

  3. Sanctioned Alliance Images

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    [img]http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj125/delendumk/amishpip1.png[/img]

    That was the other main candidate, we didn't really make any more options from last time (when he had over a 100, although a lot of them were the same design with slight changes).

  12. How many wars or alliances have you fought?

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    Was in an alliance that wasn't involved in GW1.

    GW2: NPO, NpO, VE
    GW3: NPO, NpO
    UJW: Legion, NpO
    NoCB: Andromeda, GGA, Valhalla
    Other: Inertia
    Karma: Old Guard, NPO, TPF
    BiPolar: TOP, DAWN, IRON, FEAR, TSO, TORN?
    NPO-DH: NPO, Legion, ML, TPF, NADC, Invicta, 64 Digits, TSI, Avalon, TOOL, SNAFU
    Other: Legion
    Last war: MHA, CSN, NPL, and more that I think I'm forgetting

  17. La Paraguas esta viva!

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Drai

    [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1330296039' post='2928812']
    How exactly? Most of what MK posts is just opinion or outright lying. You did it so much about me. TPF did have an account that matched MK's war abilities. VE also thought MK was doing poorly as well during the war. Where else do I have to go?
    [/quote]
    And have you ever thought about what your posts look like from another person's view? Opinions and outright lying are pretty accurate there in a lot of cases. I'm not sure if your comment was aimed at me specifically or MK as a whole which is why I brought up that I had only made one real response to you since your return out here.

    The TPF accounts were very focused on individual fronts and not the war as a whole. You can't extrapolate that much and expect it to be accurate. I talked to them in another thread about it. Also Impero was accusing us of not having enough offensive wars which nearly everybody in DH can say is false. You even accused us of being trigger-happy so I don't know why you're citing VE as a source when it goes directly against an accusation you've made recently.

  18. La Paraguas esta viva!

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Drai

    [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1330295122' post='2928803']
    Damn it Drai. Not really. Most of what you say is total bs. I just debunk it.
    [/quote]
    In your whole return on the OWF I haven't stated anything factual that you have replied to except for one comment about our war capabilities that you only really said 'ask TPF'. So let's take this post you just made for example.

    Your problem is you refuse to accept that anything outside of what you say is false (can't admit you've made a mistake) so you will always believe that you debunk everything. It makes arguments like this kind of pointless for me really.

  19. La Paraguas esta viva!

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1330292954' post='2928771']
    Consider me the equivalent to say the entire MK posting squad since I am able to take them on handily more or less.
    [/quote]
    Your idea of taking on others' posts is often changing the subject entirely and bringing out some theory that you expect everyone to believe as a fact.

  22. Proof of Allegations

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1329279507' post='2920870']
    They got hurt because they were prone to overdeclaring, something they decried PC for doing in 2009.
    [/quote]
    It's hard to overdeclare when the amount of slots available in the tier we're discussing hardly allows for anything better than 1 offensive war/nation. Care to fire another shot in the dark and hope it hits a target?

  23. Proof of Allegations

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1329273856' post='2920820']
    Assigning targets did not mean your nations performed, they were largely turtles (Not talking about 30k nations - up to 50k at the beginning - where we had you outnumbered). Upper tier I'm sure everyone knows we used that super awesome Legion strategy so there really isn't much to talk about there other than the few we did have out got sent packing in a big hurry largely by Umbrella, not MK - though that could be due to the insane activity levels of Um. Once they joined the few others we had out in 50k range they all encountered poor resistance. The offensive declarations (against TPF) weren't there like they had been in the previous fight and many didn't run attacks, etc. It's not like MK nations don't know what they're doing, we know full well they do, but for some reason didn't care to do it.

    Not of this is intended to compare penis sizes or to call MK names. It's just to say that the MK of today aint nothing special.
    [/quote]I assigned targets to people who I knew were generally active and had fought before. I'm sure we had a few nations in the first round or two that didn't sign on every day but after the mass-targeting rounds we were able to be selective. I think you're vastly overplaying a few mediocre/poor opponents you faced and trying to extrapolate it to our whole military.

    And MK declared far more wars on Legion in the upper tier than Umbrella did so I don't know where you get the idea that they were insanely active and we weren't (seriously, I had a couple MK nations stealing Umbrella targets because they were still available 1-2 days after being posted). This just makes me even more skeptical of your claims.


    [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1329274202' post='2920823']
    Just caught this edit, sorry about not including it in my previous reply. Vol didn't need to go to PM regularly is what he's saying there. He could have but there was little point in it.
    [/quote]
    Yes he did because he said he wasn't able to buy nukes because he only got into peace mode twice.

  24. Proof of Allegations

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Drai

    [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1329270422' post='2920773']
    Thing is though, the few upper tier (obviously became mid tier in a hurry - and that was Umbrellas doing, not MKs) and mid tier nations that we had out of PM were greatly outnumbered by the DH coalition in that range, yet were running over MK nations that entire war. It was like they just didn't care.
    [/quote]
    That is absolutely false. I worked with most of our mid-upper tier that war as Baron of the Vanguard and nearly every single person in that range was on IRC daily to coordinate. The 50k+ range was a cakewalk on our side. Perhaps you had the one or two nations that were too lazy to get online regularly, but when I was assigning targets I was giving them out to whoever was online at the time because we had an excess of capable and competent fighters for the targets available in that range. Don't pretend to know what you're talking about and call it 'facts' in attempt to prove some point that is non-existent.

    Edit: We had deletions throughout a lot of 2010 after the TOP war and during early 2011 but those weren't the people on the battlefield and I can assure you that nearly everybody who still has a nation in MK is ready to fight. And yes, the lower tier was an uphill battle since it was constantly being spammed with higher-tech wonderheavy nations that the mid and upper tiers had beaten down.

    @volnavy, we took heavy damage that war because we were often fighting 3v1s or 3v2s in the upper tiers which puts us at a nuclear disadvantage. Also how did you have an easier time getting to peace mode than Rafael if you only were in peace mode twice throughout nearly 3 months. Your post is filled with stats that are proving a different point than what you're wanting them to say.

×
×
  • Create New...