Jump to content

Aeternalis

Banned
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    582

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Aeternalis

  2. Peace Mode Arguments

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    The day that PM became cowardly and not a valid war tactic is still beyond me.

    Is it more boring right now as a result? Yeah, but let things pan out a little first.

    I dont' care necessarily about peace mode, more about the stupid back and forth argument about the "cowardice" of it.

  3. Peace Mode Arguments

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by Aeternalis

    If you want to fight, then get your nations out of peace mode, lol cowards.

    We've all seen this argument, yes? We're all sick of it, yes? So, in order that it is never again used by the CoC, I've arranged some peace mode stats. The first number is the number of nations in PM, and the next number shows the percentage of nations in PM

    SF/CnG

    RoK: 160 - 56.9%

    GOD: 17 - 21.8%

    \m/: 18 - 24.0%

    Athens: 112 - 64.3%

    CoC

    IRON: 394 - 77.6%

    NEW: 117- 72.2%

    DAWN: 7 - 63.6%

    MCXA: 173 - 76.5%

    TFD: 92 - 72.4%

    Invicta: 120 - 73.2%

    NATO: 145 - 72.9%

    Zenith: 40 - 76.9%

    TORN: 33 - 82.5%

    TOOL: 184 - 73.0%

    TSI: 45 - 69.2%

    ML: 31 - 83.8%

    AOD Brigade: 14 - 93.3%

    SNAFU: 60 - 75.9%

    BAPS: 52 - 89.7%

    FEAR: 79 - 84.0%

    So please, realize the hypocrisy and your foolishness

  10. Nutty North Koreans

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    My English are not as good as the Dear Leader Kim Jong-Il's, but I tell you that the answer to your question which you proposed in the previous post that you posted had already been answer in the Q&A section in the charter which I proposed in the previous post that I posted. Thank you for time.

    which is exactly where i stole the question from

  14. Aren't you glad you get a say?

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by Aeternalis

    The value of an opinion is inversely proportionate to the number of opinions. Therefore, merely by having one, I'm cheapening everybody else's.

    Opinion inflation, suckas!

    mind blew

    also, i need to share my opinion: All these TPF war threads have hella long OP's. Can we please get some tl;dr up here?

  19. Just a quick comment on recent events

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    You mean you don't feel like backing up your trash-talking with anything except vague ramblings.

    I'm sorry that we're able to note that there is a slight difference between a boss reprimanding a subordinate, and an ally restricting the rights of it's erstwhile equal. Oh, I'm sorry, were you using that comparison before it got the crap beaten out of it?

    You're right, i guess a signatory of an MADP going to war does not only endanger the particular signatory, but also the other signatories based on the warring party's ability to defend themselves and their allies when a real situation (like this one) arises; furthermore violating the spirit of the MADP treaty, particularly the war clause.

    But something i will take away from this is that i never have to take Corinan's word, or word of any NSO gov, with any weight, as their actions will be reversed at whim by object of your admiration.

  21. Just a quick comment on recent events

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    You should do some read before talking.

    RIA is a sovereign alliance which has a treaty with another alliance (Fark).

    Moldavi is the leader of the NSO and Corinan's boss.

    You don't need to be a genius to notice that those are completely different scenarios.

    speaking of reading:

    And Fark has the ability to stop RIA from going into a foolish war because it violates the spirit of their treaty.
×
×
  • Create New...