Jump to content

bibliophile

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    172

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by bibliophile

  1. The Superfriends answer the call

    in TE OWF Archive

    Posted

    I'm 53, so calling me "kid" would make me feel young again. By not doing so dogbite has made me feel old. Clearly grounds for a DoW and many rounds of dogbite hating :P

    Irrelevant to the current war in TE I know, or the OP, but LincolnC started it ([url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=88448&view=findpost&p=2359250"]here[/url]).

    Like KO said: "continue the pointless discussion."

  2. The Superfriends answer the call

    in TE OWF Archive

    Posted

    [quote name='kong' date='04 July 2010 - 04:16 AM' timestamp='1278231388' post='2359362']
    Now, that I've recalled, dogbite called me a "kid" once too.
    After reading your inspiring posts I've decided to feel deeply offended and have my terrible revenge one day.
    [/quote]

    Dogbite has never called me "kid". I feel left out and demand retribution!!

  3. The Superfriends answer the call

    in TE OWF Archive

    Posted

    [quote name='LincolnC' date='03 July 2010 - 12:35 AM' timestamp='1278131728' post='2358415']
    We hope that [i]The Phoenix Cobras[/i] will do the honorable thing and keep this war 1v1 . . . instead of dragging other alliances in.
    [/quote]

    You mean like you did (not) here: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=88454&view=findpost&p=2358476

  4. The Superfriends to the rescure

    in TE OWF Archive

    Posted · Edited by bibliophile

    [quote name='LincolnC' date='03 July 2010 - 01:32 AM' timestamp='1278135107' post='2358476']
    [i]The Superfriends[/i] has an [u]MDoAP[/u] with [i]Bad Company[/i]. We do not like other alliances trying to "welcome" our friends at [i]Bad Company[/i] into CN:TE with war. We have tried to settle our disputes with the evil villains attacking [i]Bad Company[/i] but our efforts to smooth things out were not taken.
    [/quote]

    Just want to make sure I have the chronology straight:

    The Flying Kiwis declare against Bad Company at 12:50 AM server time, July 2.
    Superfriends declare against The Flying Kiwis at 1:32 AM server time July 3 after having "tried to settle our disputes with the evil villains attacking [i]Bad Company[/i] but our efforts to smooth things out were not taken."

    o/ 40 minutes of trying "to settle our disputes" during update when people are focused on what WAS a more or less balanced war before you declared

  7. The race that REALLY matters.

    in TE OWF Archive

    Posted · Edited by bibliophile

    [quote name='Imploding Diarrhea' date='19 April 2010 - 06:23 PM' timestamp='1271715774' post='2266861']
    Biblio, Stop running over my tanks they don't increase my attacking casualties. :lol1:
    [/quote]

    If you'd reduce your number of defending soldiers and tanks low enough that I could get solid odds of wining some GAs, then I'd be more than happy to contribute to your defending casualties and in that way to your total casualties.

    Just trying to be helpful :D

    Edit: spelling

  23. Trouble Announcement

    in TE OWF Archive

    Posted · Edited by bibliophile

    Although the space allotted here can't possibly suffice to elaborate in detail on the long list of Burning Glory's contumelious litanies—including the maledicent, the insolent, the prolix, and especially the haughty—I'll use what little space I have to send Burning Glory's contrivances into the dustbin where they belong. For starters, Burning Glory may unwittingly create a factitious demand for his prissy, annoying roorbacks. I say "unwittingly" because he is apparently unaware that he operates under the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why Burning Glory is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.

    Burning Glory has lost contact with reality. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune, then there is indisputably no hope for you. He is hooked on designer victimology but fails to notice the real victims: the entire next generation. I myself sincerely maintain that my crusades regarding selfish, gruesome pseudo-intellectuals of one sort or another, while far from complete, will wage war on gangsterism. Okay, that's a bit of an overstatement, but for all of you reading this who are not feckless, flagitious hatemongers, you can understand where the motivation for that statement comes from. It has been said that the foundations of our free society are under wide-ranging and powerful attack by Burning Glory's wretched adherents. I, in turn, claim that I welcome Burning Glory's comments. However, Burning Glory needs to realize that his bedfellows like to say, "It's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the backwards hands of drugged-out tightwads." Such frothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. If someone wants me to believe something soulless like that, that person will have to show me some concrete evidence. Meanwhile, I intend to show you that over the years, I've enjoyed a number of genuinely pleasurable (and pleasurably genuine) conversations with a variety of people who understand that Burning Glory's agitprop machine is running at full throttle. In one such conversation, someone pointed out to me that Burning Glory's claim that fetishism is a noble goal requires a willing suspension of disbelief, an ability to set logic aside and accept any preposterous notion that Burning Glory throws at us. Sorry for babbling so much, but pragmatic adherence to concision necessitates that I delete a plethora of thoroughly unflattering adjectives regarding Burning Glory's taradiddles

    Since you have read but declined to respond to my ingame request for the "facts" mentioned in your OP, I can only conclude that you really are not interested in communicating facts but rather just spreading confusion. In light of the OP and what is above you might benefit from the advice that I was given on a 1st year university paper: "You have a facility for a pompous turn of phrase that might best be curbed."

    I took that advice years ago, and the clarity of my communication improved immensely as a result. Maybe you could do us all the favour of doing the same.

×
×
  • Create New...