Jump to content

crazymatty

Banned
  • Posts

    249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by crazymatty

  1. Leaking warchest info is a tired tactic.

     

    What about leaking NpO war tatics?

     

    To:

    Crazymatty   



    From:

    JasonA   





    Date: 8/24/2013 6:31:36 AM



    Subject: Escorted Bombing Attack Report
     




     


    Message: A fighter escorted bombing run has been
    launched against your nation by JasonA. In the attack you lost 0
    defending tanks, 0 cruise missiles, and 0.00 infrastructure. You
    destroyed 20 attacking bombers. You lost 1 fighter aircraft and
    destroyed 8 fighter aircraft launched by JasonA. Any existing peace
    offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled.
     
     
     

     

    To:

    Crazymatty   



    From:

    JasonA   





    Date: 8/24/2013 6:32:07 AM



    Subject: Escorted Bombing Attack Report
     




     


    Message: A fighter escorted bombing run has been
    launched against your nation by JasonA. In the attack you lost 0
    defending tanks, 0 cruise missiles, and 0.00 infrastructure. You
    destroyed 10 attacking bombers. You lost 1 fighter aircraft and
    destroyed 4 fighter aircraft launched by JasonA. Any existing peace
    offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled.
     
  2. [quote name='Duncan King' timestamp='1299890836' post='2660678']

    How about the PC government members who, judging by the appeals, got caught with their hands in the cookie jar?



    Good luck to the new PC government members. Your backbench is almost as impressive as your homefield, so I suspect you'll be fine.
    [/quote]

    How can you know anything by their appeals...innocence or guilt? I find it funny the accused are not allowed to put up any kind of defense. But hey it isn't your side of the web so all is fair right? "First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out..."

  3. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1299343991' post='2653555']
    Cheers bro. But yeah, totally, I brought it up just to nitpick. Or maybe because I think bringing anything OOC, but especially something of that magnitude, into a declaration of war is silly. Even more so when it is mentioned in the sentence which says who they are declaring on and why. I said I was sorry for their loss, that I'd obviously read it differently than intended, and explained why. So get off your high horse.
    [/quote]

    So yet again...you pick on someone who has passed away to step on your soap box. You stay classy bag o' !@#$%!!

    Let me guess you will respond...yet again...saying why they were wrong. But you will say..."sorry for your loss...BUT...blah blah blah".

    It continues to amaze me how classless people will be just to make their point. OCC or not.

  4. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1299341665' post='2653526']

    If it was a footnote I wouldn't have said anything. It was its placement here that caught my attention: Tonight, in support of our allies, and to honour the memory of a fallen brother, we declare war on the New Pacific Order. I guess I'm just reading it differently than it was intended, and I'll drop it now, it just seemed to be suggesting that the DoW was in some way avenging him.
    [/quote]
    It's official...people will nitpick ANYTHING. WC..you look like a class A !@#$% right now. I think you are the only single person that read it like that.

×
×
  • Create New...