Jump to content

Chunky Monkey

Members
  • Posts

    385
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chunky Monkey

  1. Love the last question.... two options for not caring. But this is a result to boring ass stagnant mainstream politics. You $%&@ers are scared to war anymore and just want to hold hands

    It's like meta-not caring.

  2. Friends tying friends. Who would've guessed. I support.

    It's not as if, I'd be upset that they might hang out with each other more instead of me. It's not like, I'm jealous.

    It's not like. Someone should attack Molagbal, just so I could defend him first and win his heart back.

    It's not even like that.

    [spoiler]
    Also, it's not like, when someone was trying to post their treaty, they got whined at for trying to spend 5 minutes fixing the flag, so he instead went with the default ones.

    But when it's with his new friend, he posted perfectly aligned flags.[/spoiler]

    It's not like House spent (not kidding) an hour trying to get the flags right last time. I'm sure we got it down now. No big deal.

     

    Also, go team!

  3. That is the dumbest design for a space carrier ever.

     

    It's not a terrible design if the ship has to operate in the atmosphere/landed in water as well as space. Presumably the surrogate ships would also be designed for atmospheric flight and need a runway to takeoff and land. That said, if the smaller craft in the picture are what it's launching, and the perspective isn't all screwed up, they can carry, at most, 10 of those ships. Which would make them kinda dumb since they could have just made bigger ones that carry more.

  4. This is probably the last thing I'll say on the subject. The answer is what the answer is. The situation was resolved between us and MI6 without issue, privately. If you guys would like to continue to spin up more and more ridiculous conspiracy theories where we are the secret power behind Oculus and we secretly rule the game and we somehow have the NS to fight MI6 even if they attacked us and we activated treaties, you're more than welcome to. We will no longer indulge your insane fantasies to try to explain to you how you aren't making sense (again, for at least the third time).

  5. Yall seem rather sensitive when the subject is brought up. Just an observation.

     

    How would you like us to respond when people attempt to use a small incident that had already been resolved to stir up drama for whatever inexplicable purposes they have? The question was posed, we said it was none of peoples business and that it had already been resolved satisfactorily. Then not one but two threads were derailed and a whole new thread created on the topic. I pointed out that I disagreed with the decision to stir this up on the OWF, and restated our position (which hasn't changed). I have done nothing but state the facts of the matter, and point out the insanity of some people's arguments (people who don't seem to listen). I fail to see how this is being sensitive to the topic. You are free to ask again what happened and receive the same answer.

  6. Sengoku isn't historically aggressive at all, and has no (recent) issue with MI6.

    I'm not sure why you're denying your blatant attempts to bait MI6 into a war here, or why you'd pin it on Sengoku just because they're in a bloc.

     

    If you're so concerned about defending MI6 I suggest you do something about it instead of attempting to troll us over it.

  7. I'm not planning to roll anyone. I just want to know why the MI6 response to this incident is markedly different from the other, despite the obvious, glaring similarities in the spy ops.

     

     

    It's quite simple really. We weren't rude about it.

×
×
  • Create New...