lakerzz8
-
Posts
646 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by lakerzz8
-
-
[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1295327736' post='2580228']
I love people who like to argue with the propaganda sigs
The last piece of the night:
[img]http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/236/vedoublestandards.gif[/img]
[/quote]
Very well done! Good work, man! -
[quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1295323499' post='2579942']
[color="#0000FF"]Another unknown author.[/color]
[img]http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/6027/byepolarwar.png[/img]
[/quote]
Hahaha, nice one.
Also, D34th's work is awesome as always. -
[quote name='BlkAK47_002' timestamp='1295319194' post='2579622']
So much Bawwwwing during STA's birthday,
Come on guys, it's a celebration
[/quote]
I don't understand it. We even hired a clown...Voytek, get back to work! -
[quote name='Voytek' timestamp='1295318553' post='2579571']
lol
Polaris' demise is a thing to be smug about for you? Yikes.
[/quote]
I'm smug about how many tears I've collected from PB+MK in this thread. When'd you guys become so sensitive? -
[quote name='brickyard' timestamp='1295318360' post='2579548']
ITT: STA jokes, its closest ally burns
[/quote]
ITT: Haters gonna hate -
[quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1295318327' post='2579547']
I saw the title and immediately thought "STA joke declaration" and was proven right once I opened it.
As I said...
[/quote]
You still opened it, still read it, still felt the need to reply..twice. Plus, it's not a joke. Why can't we post an anniversary thread like every other alliance does? -
[quote name='Masterof9puppets' timestamp='1295318235' post='2579538']
This joke was funny the first time that it was used. Years ago.
Now, not so much.
[/quote]
Your tears were funny the first time you shed them. Years ago.
Now, still funny. -
[quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1295317958' post='2579508']
This only works when you [i]don't[/i] do it every other month.
[/quote]
Your comment only makes sense if you weren't dying to read every thread and posting in each one. Clearly it still worked -
[quote name='Instr' timestamp='1295317889' post='2579498']
I like how you're making lame jokes while your close ally is burning. Or is this a veiled statement of intent?
[/quote]
It's been 10 minutes since war has been declared. Or has TOP already had so much influence on you that you think everyone should be declaring preemptively? -
[quote name='mythicknight' timestamp='1295317827' post='2579486']
This was original in 2006.
[/quote]
I don't believe we celebrated our 4 years prior to this. So you stand corrected. -
Here's to another 4 years!
-
[quote name='We Are Not Alone' timestamp='1295315614' post='2579257']
I hope VE burns.
[/quote]
You are not alone... -
Every time a thread like this is created someone seems to suggest that what the game really needs is a mass reset or a way to accomplish such a reset without Admin's intervention. That is the worst possible thing that could happen to this game. You do realize that the reason most people haven't left is because of the time they have put into their nations. As humans, we see little difference in the attachment we feel when putting our time and effort into a real world accomplishment and into a virtual accomplishment. If 1, 2, 3, or even 4 years of work was erased, there would be a lot less players than there are now. Many people claim to only stick around for the community but I would bet anything that a person who deletes his/her nation stops checking forums and going on IRC a lot sooner than someone who continues to keep their nation going even in a half-assed manner (yes, certain exceptions may exist, but I'm talking majority here).
Now this isn't to say I'm against a global war that might knock down people's infra levels, but the majority of players won't go for deleting their infra (and tech if it was an option) and wouldn't bother recreating a nation if Admin did a reset. -
Good to see this announced
o/ To new allies -
Heh, I find it funny that people feel the need to post and say this was a "look at me" thread. The whole point of your post was also so that someone would look at you and read what you think.
-
[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1291781037' post='2533522']
Hahahah, joke competition couldn't even properly tabulate winners (the Fark thing was broken) and the ones you came out with are utter jokes. NpO and UPN, goliaths of the battlefield indeed
I pity all involved
[/quote]
Each alliance only had to select 10 of their members. Whether or not an alliance is known as a good fighting alliance, it is still very likely that there are at least 10 decent fighters wearing that AA (at least for alliances with 100+ members). It is also very likely that those that enjoy fighting and are decent fighters were the ones that volunteered for this competition. Therefore, just because an alliance, in your opinion, is not known for being great fighters, does not mean they couldn't have fielded a great team. Your attempt to correlate past global war performance with results in this competition are seriously flawed due to the aforementioned reasons. -
Thanks
-
I logged in to my nation, 10 minutes after update, and proceeded to pay my bills. I then went to the navy purchase screen and wanted to buy my navy vessels for the day as I have the past few days. However, it said I had already made my purchases for the day and cannot buy anymore. I was watching hockey the previous 2 hours and could not have possibly logged in to my nation within the 10 minutes after update but before I paid my bills. If you look at my nation chart my nation has not grown in size since yesterday. Had I bought additional navy after update today there would have been an increase. Any help would be appreciated.
-
[quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1290287462' post='2518406']
He may have mispelled princess.
[/quote]
This made me laugh. Thanks! -
Sounds like this could be fun.
-
[quote name='Kaizer BoB' timestamp='1289879062' post='2514061']
Any one?
[/quote]
There's peace in this game? -
I don't believe your agenda exists. Sure, it is a question of faith, but I just don't have that faith. I believe those that believe in your agenda are limiting their own free-thinking and are using your agenda as an excuse to do as they please, even if your agenda does not really approve of those actions. Sure, they will claim your agenda must exist because their posts say it exists. And their posts must be true because it is a response to your agenda. It is a circular argument that I do not wish to support. Granted, I am not a scholar on the subject and have only dabbled in a reading of an agenda-post here and there, so I could be way off and really regret my non-belief in your agenda when I am forced to spend eternity in Valhalla.
-
[quote name='Chalaskan' timestamp='1289699463' post='2512394']
I must say getting back in the top 5% once again is definitely something that keeps me playing. I see it as an achievable goal, and damn near did it before the last war.
Regardless, boredom is the biggest problem with the game at this point. A major shakedown would increase activity and increase members.
Don't ask me how to achieve that other than a possible reset.
[/quote]
There is nothing worse that can be done to this game than a reset. The last thing people who have spent months/years + real money want to do is start all over again. I would say that the most optimistic estimate would see at least 50% of current players decide not to return. The only players that would want to stick around are new players that don't want to play catch up to the old players. Most new players don't seem to stick around anyway. It is a lose lose. -
We are 48 on that second site now.
Name that war!
in Open World RP
Posted
[quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1295331098' post='2580407']
Why are you so mad?
[/quote]
Hahaha, exactly what I was thinking. You would think MK would be happy after forcing VE to make up a CB so that MK can finally roll Polar.