animea90
-
Posts
208 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by animea90
-
-
No offense but your name being roflcopter kind of takes away from the seriousness of "the tempest". Congrats on your name change though.
-
I do agree that it is interesting that we have 10k nations less but many many more alliances. I think part of it is the lack of any real "opponent" in the game. Before GW3 there were clear lines drawn on who supported what side(except for the few alliances stuck in the middle, but this just made things more interesting as both sides tried to get them to join their side). You could accomplish something and help your side "win" the game.
Nowadays there is no real enemy. No large alliances hate each other enough to actually lead to a war. Without the us vs them many people are bored with their large alliances. So they created small ones to feel active in the game again.
-
There is little point in treaties because alliances do not gain anything from attacking you. As long as you do not do something stupid you do not have to worry about being attacked.
-
Honestly, a disbandment wouldn't surprise me in the next couple of days, just to stop a war from coming to them.
that would be a smart move to save the member base.
-
I'm sure they would if they could, but between 104 nations, they have 17 nukes.
(and yes, i do "c wut u did thar")
Yeah, seriously unless NEO replaces most of its leadership I will be very surprised if by the end of the five days they have half of their current member base though.
-
So 5 day countdown until NEO goes out in a Blaze?
-
Have you tried privately contacting NEO to find out why you were attacked?
-
Those Ragnarok people are real jerks
I NO RITE?
-
hail us
-
I hear red is always looking for new alliances
-
And you get a kick out of it. Thats the value you get from this game.
To say you play the game contentiously isn't a fallacy, as your nation exists all this time.
For it to exist like that, you need to play the game continuously. Just because this game isn't very time consuming to play it on a basic level, doesn't mean my sentence is fallacious.
Inherently your original sentence is fallacious. Nobody can claim, who play the game continuously, that they do not get anything from it.
Your sentence can only have meaning, if we rearrange it a bit. And get to the real meaning of it.
It isn't that those not in power in this game, can not get any real value from it.
They can, and obviously do.
It is that they have a hard time getting to the value of-- being the dominating power in the game.
Well, tough luck. You tried and failed. Tough luck. Should have played it better.
So stop crying me a river. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. Like in every game.
I believe he is saying that their is no value in trying to compete at top levels of the game as the NPO and their allies control everything.
Note: I am not agreeing with him, but I think you are misreading what he is trying to say.
-
I would suggest changing your flag out as you aren't the Emperor of NPO and do not have the right to use that flag in any way, shape or form.
or else you will declare war on his alliance
-
frankly, i am unsure of any war that the Orders have joined or ended up leading, that was started over OOC comments. i can think of one that basically ended due to OOC comments.
i can also think of one that basically started by an ally of the Orders over OOC stuff, but the Orders only joined due to an uninvolved alliance (though they state they had a treaty just never posted it) involving itself in the war. so, the only reason the Orders joined was to aid in the defense of an ally. nothing to do with the OOC stuff.
so if you can give me some examples i would gladly like to see them.
The second great war started because GOONs attacked FARK over comments FARK made OOC.
-
personally i agree with you on the first paragraph. but unfortunately this is CN. though, i have yet to see either of the Orders commit this act.
Orders themselves, no, but I have seen multiple occasions where the Orders allies went to war over this reason, then the Orders agreed with this act, join the war and end up leading their sides forces.
-
I would like to point out that the Fark war had no IC basis and a very weak OOC basis. What essentially happened was Something awful(where GOONs originated) had a rivalry with the Fark website. Cybernations.com was posted on the fark website, large amounts of members came over and a few posted about "getting GOONs" in the new game. GOONs decided that an OOC post on another board by people who had joined the game a few days ago was a threat. They decided to declare war on FARK indefinitely in a hopes they would leave the game.
I really do not see how FARK could have been seen as a threat to GOONs. Most of their nations had just started and were at 10 NS at most. The government of FARK had not even been created when war was declared.
-
Why are people so proud to have a democratic alliance? I would say most of the alliances in the game have democratic values. Even those with emperors generally have a good deal of elected positions. Even RoK is very close to a democracy. I do not know of any alliances which do not have a good deal of elected positions.
-
lol everyone always says wait and something will happen. I have heard this toon for the longest time yet its always the same old blah d blah.
Soon i'll collect social security and people will still be saying you just wait
If you want something to happen do it yourself. Start an opposing power bloc or become strong enough in an existing one to cause a schism and start a war.
-
Official Ragnarok Response
lol
Thank you.
Van Hoo III
Emperor of Ragnarok
The Emperor has chosen to come down and impart us with his glorious words of wisdom. Hail the emperor.
-
Good luck guys. I hope this turns out better than ACL
-
ZERO will be receiving the rank of Initiate for their leader, Grandmaster Cheyenne.
Am I the only one who caught this. I loled.
Topic about treaties
in Open World Forum
Posted
I think CN needs less treaties not more.