Asa Phillips

We already have one of those. 203 perhaps, but we have some applicants who need to switch their AA first. Basically, get in before 205 members to be safe.

Alliance stats and Members Join one of the oldest and most steadfast Alliances in Cybernations. www.worldtaskforce.com

www.worldtaskforce.com

You as well. I'm jealous.

What?! and lose all my casualties?! Never. :lol:

Excellent fight OB, glad to see this ended sooner rather than later. Time to sell some land, decommission some troops, and buy other stuff for the rebuild. Bob White Minister of Fresh Fruits and Veggies, Priapism

That is all we ever wanted... an admission of defeat. And until now it was scoffed at. Even earlier today you messaged our members begging to call this a "tie". I'm glad you guys have seen the light and in one weeks time have learned some humility. How would I know you are under the age of 13? In my defense, I checked earlier today and just now again and you have no age set in your profile. My statement was merely coincidence if it applied to you. And if I was indeed God, I would've struck the silly notion from admins head when he considered adding these new outer spaces-based wonders that self destruct.

I keep everything in-character. Only once did I make the mistake of being out of line according to the rules here and I apologized to the correct person who deserved it. I said nothing that could be directly attributed to you at all, though I find it interesting you should reply again after you quoted statement above. Guilty conscience perhaps? I am also a man of my word, when I state something, I stick to it. So, I'd appreciate it if you didn't think everything in this thread was about you and stop trying to fight with me when you said you weren't going to.

Allies? To be brutally honest? No. Not while certain members are still in your ranks of leadership and unwilling to step out of denial. Maybe if you put an age limit on your membership? Say, no one under 13? That may do the trick.

And thank you, I put a lot of thought into that one. Bob White Minister of Fresh Fruits and Veggies, Priapism

Hahaha, there you are again. I knew you couldnt resist. Its ok, I'd been warned about you by some of your alliance mates already... I understand how important your CNTE life is to you, and losing is something you have a hard time admitting. Its ok. Really. You can lose every once in a while and no ones going to care. Really. And admitting to it is something that will help you build character. So, you see? Priapism has done you personally a favor by stomping your alliance for its acts of aggression against us. All that is needed now is for you to take that final step. Please, there are no thanks needed. You're welcome. Bob White Minister of Fresh Fruits and Veggies, Priapism

I'm sorry you feel that way. I was enjoying you stumbling all over your statements like a thief in a kings robes. It would be a shame for you to stop now while you're on such a good roll. Bob White Minister of Fresh Fruits and Veggies, Priapism

Then shut your pet up who lacks the ability to admit a loss, the same one who now threatens us with allies again after the notion was squashed publicly on here by your leader eyerack. While you're ahead, please stop with the Minister of War thing too. These pretend e-titles get terribly silly. Minister of War is no different or endearing then Minister of Fresh Fruits and Veggies... both are fake, neither is impressive. And if you were referring to me previously about IRC? Ive already answered you why I won't be on anytime soon. You say we need to come to peace. You want peace? Admitting a loss goes a long way towards that. Maybe in another day or two it'll be easier to admit on your end. Losing, really isn't so bad, it happens to the best of us. Bob White Minister of Fresh Fruits and Veggies, Priapism

Remember saying that? You claim these losses you are incurring are only "battles", dismissing them as if we haven't curb stomped you. Right now, we are WINNING the war, and the battles. And as the bulk of your offensive wars expire tomorrow, we will only continue winning by greater and greater amounts as your total NS keeps dropping at a much faster rate than ours. Do you understand? We are winning, period. And will continue to do so till our offensive wars have all expired. In the end, it will be soundly obvious that we have WON. But you understand that don't you? It is just that blind denial wont get you very far unfortunately and you cant come up with another angle other than to threaten we label our win as a tie or you'll call your dad on us.

Close, but numbers 2 and 3 need to be switched with one another and OB was never offered anything remotely close to serious terms by us.

I thought it wasn't a war? Rather these were just "battles" that you were losing to us? You suggested the "war" would be won by OB if we continued on. So, at what point is this a "war" between our alliances? Your leader says it is, but you said it wasnt, then when I pointed that out to you... you mention something about battle reports in your inbox (the ones that surely have put you and so many of your friends in anarchy) and now youve said it is a war as well. I think you have managed to confuse yourself. What a shame, really. Especially when you were doing soooo well in your previous replies. I'm sure your head is just spinning because you cant figure out how this happened after things looked so promising. I'd be interested to hear tho how you feel it is determined who the loser is when a war between two alliance happens. Maybe you can enlighten the rest of us, because on my planet, the one who loses the most... is the loser. 7/17 when you attacked us: OB= 57,998 total NS Priaprism= 57,085 total NS Today, 7/23[ OB= 35,819 total NS Priapism= 36,534 total NS (we actually GAINED strength since yesterday) Total losses for each side OB= 22,179 Priapism= 20,551 We caused you to lose more with less nations and playing from behind. How can you deny this? And the pendulum is still swinging in our direction as the bulk of our defensive wars don't expire till the 27th, while the bulk of your offensive wars expire TODAY Get back to me in a few days and we'll see how much worse its gotten for you by letting the wars play out with no redeclarations. Amazingly enough... theres this message YOU sent out today in-game. Sounds both desperate and further confused since you're the ones on the defeat end of the NS spectrum currently, and are contradicting your own leaders very words when he said there would be no cries for help from OB to its allies. I quote: Are you saying your leader is a liar? that his word is no good? are you saying that you have no intentions of following his statement and have a different agenda all your own? that you wish to run the show now instead of later? He says no cries for help will be made, instead you threaten with them all over again like a desperate man clinging onto that last bit of hope before your ship passes quietly under the waters unnoticed. And what on earth would make you think we would want to be friends with you? The OB members we have respect for already know who they are from private conversations with them... but why would we want to be friends with an alliance as a whole who cant finish a job they started and still tries to claim tie out of defeat? We may as well round up every None nation out there in anarchy and add them to our list of friends too.

To be honest with you, we thought you were a rogue tho and just treated you as such. Usually when someone jumps the gun on an alliance war their fellow members follow soon after, which is why many of us stayed in DEFCON 5 and collected taxes, suspecting nothing. Its interesting to learn this was a coordinated attack from the start, and not just an alliance backing up a rogue nation and using it as a reason to declare war. Thank you for this. Also, I like you and most of what you had to say. Please coup your "leader" asap so you may save OB before its too late.

1st, its leaderS, not leader. 2nd, Since the 20th of this month, when most of us at Priapism came out of anarchy... there have been 5 declarations made by the 26 OB nations. While on the other hand, there have been 21 declarations out of the 20 Priapism nations. No coordinated attacks huh? its just strictly coincidence then that once you couldnt hold us down that your destruction went into overdrive? Are you saying your alliance is that poor in keeping its advantage then? or we just made all those declarations by accident? Hands down, we've beaten you and you just aren't man enough to admit you made a mistake in guiding your alliance and much is lost because of it. I hate to ask this, as many of my closest friends on here are from the same area of the world, but are you British by chance? From my experience, you guys have a tough time ever admitting when you lose and love to let the condescending attitude spew forth while doing it. So, if you are, that would explain everything, and I forgive you. Also, we put another one of your members into anarchy today I believe. That is now 64% with one of your members disappearing. Also: Please prove to be an individual of your word, if you cant man-up and salvage face in the eyes of both your allies and alliance mates... then what further purpose would you be serving?

Ummmm... Pretty sure that this here is a war between our two alliances. No one declares "battles" on another alliance. We have indeed won the war, and I suspect by the end of today's or tomorrow's conflicts you will see that when our total NS is higher than yours, when yours was higher that ours to begin with. Meaning? You will have lost much more than we have. That by definition is a win, in this war your alliance declared. Face it, in a one on one situation that your alliance started we have indeed won both soundly and with our backs against the wall. Being man enough, and honorable enough, to admit so, is the toughest part it seems.

No, question it. True signs of leadership is to question what is already established and to replace it when it proves inept. It will also help your "leader" become a better one should he/she be open minded enough to listen. From this topic, I would follow you into battle and fight by your side long before I would follow your pretend e-leader.

Also, another side note. Now 58% of your nations are in anarchy. Better yet? OB total NS losses for today: 5,764 Pri total NS losses for today: 400 You're right, your leadership is impeccable... and ours sucks. Obviously. You must be fabulous allies for your friends to have.

Good. Bottom line? An alliance you see as being inferior to you because we all work together as opposed to relying on a single player with a pretend e-title, is kicking your tails currently. You say you would "love to know how that works"? I think we've proven well enough over the past few days just how well thats worked out havent we? And it is history that says numbers win the war, not AvgNS. Unless you are foolish enough to forget how all the gang bangs here on CN have turned out in the past. Pacifica being the latest to fall victim to being on the wrong end of the gang bang. So, both CN history AND this experience regarding both gang bangs and collective leadership have proven you wrong once again.

Are you really not reading the rest of the thread? Or are you just trying to spin the scenario in a direction that reflects best on your side with your statements? Total member count (and its associated available war slots) is, and always will be, the deciding advantage in an aggressive war as long as its members are not inactive. And if its member ARE inactive? It has zero business going to war in the first place, which is poor leadership when it comes to assessing your own alliance, let alone your opponents. Think about it in simple terms, you have an unaligned rogue attack an alliance mate, you fill their war slots because it is not only fun to smash them, but its the smart thing to do that deals the most damage. Having 18 more available offensive slots AND the ability to prepare for war because YOU knew when it was going to begin, is more than enough advantage against an opponent you hold a statistic advantage against. You see, AvgNS means very little... and what I mean by AvgNS is both OB's and ours. Flexibility, preparedness and the element of surprise is everything. TE is not CN:R Where the bigger nations over 100kNS are tough to bring down because its harder to find capable and available fighters in their range of attack. The is very little different between a 4kNS and a 3kNS nation, nothing that cant be easily made up for... as you did correctly when you blitzed us with larger numbers and had half of us in anarchy within 2 or 3 days. If you're just spinning the whole thing as previously mentioned and slightly suspected? I hope you get genital warts from a dirty toilet seat. If you're not? and didn't fully understand? Then you're welcome.

Yes, but when you have protectors and allies, you're obligated to act on their behalf as well when you act... as your binding agreement with them is a reflection on them as well. So if you act like !@#$%*^, then they are the ones who have to come in and defend their !@#$% friends. Smart or not... on the planet on which I reside? That is poor form at best. We took our lumps, and said nothing about it, not choosing to run off and get help... ultimately, the question has to be asked, can the aggressor who had all the advantages not be as honorable to take their lumps as well? Also, I just got a big grin when you admitted to being overwhelmed. I thank you for that.

So, you're saying that if I see you on the street and pick a random fight with you, that its more than acceptable for me to have my friends jump you when I start to lose? And not only is it acceptable, its also "tactically smarter"? I'm not sure what planet YOUR from, but on mine? We take our beating if we deserve it and admit when we're wrong. We don't go the "tactically smarter" route and look like !@#$%*^ on top of being sore losers.