jraenar
-
Posts
452 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by jraenar
-
-
[quote name='Caladin' timestamp='1351437252' post='3046051']
We where hit in the first few hours of the round, and have been struggling to rebuild since then.
Getting the ten million needed for an MP has not proven possible for most of us, despite our best efforts.
[/quote]
Every single one of the four OP I am fighting has the ten million needed for an MP, and then some (and one does have MP). And I'm in the lower tier.
It's possible for most of you to have MP at this point. You just chose not to, hoping your lack of nukes and copious tears would act as a shield. But you forget, RE loves the taste of tears
-
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1351402588' post='3045965']
So you are just another one of the 700.
Move on over to the peanut gallery where you belong, sonny.
[/quote]
Oh, so you mean ADude should not comment on others' wars, just like you and paul never did for all of RE's wars for the past four rounds or so?
Oh... wait...
Fine when OP does it. Terrible when anyone else does. Good to see your double standards are still alive and kicking, was worried about you for a minute there. -
One raid. Check most alliances, and they will have one or two "wars" going on at any given point, some will *gasp* even be against nations in alliances.
-
One raid three hours before update does not make a war. Keep trying, though.
-
Not really our fault we blitzed at the same time.
-
[quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1351400747' post='3045917']
Nice down declare, RE.
[/quote]
Good to see you're still at your knee-jerk posting. OP+Hellas prewar had 40k NS advantage. So, not a down-declare. Keep crying, though. -
It varies a lot with the trades/improvements/wonders that you have. Under ideal conditions, somewhere around 18.5k infra is where adding 1 more infra will cost more in additional bills than you will get in additional taxes. Somewhere around 37k, the bills from infra will exceed your possible income. Under more typical conditions, it's closer to 16k infra / 32k infra for peak profit / zero profit. This ignores other bill sources and costs for improvement swapping, so shift downward accordingly.
-
Except it was nothing. But keep getting your panties in a bunch if it makes you feel better. Oh, and
[quote]/cs set #pella restricted on[/quote]
You're welcome. -
Just barely passed 1 million, though I didn't think to copy the final numbers down.
-
My dear LNIL, the OWF is the last bastion of civility left on the entire Interweb.
-
Tooter? I'm hoping that was not intentional
Good luck and all that. -
If Ai has plans to roll anyone, it's news to me.
I'm the Minister of Defense, btw. -
So, two jumps away instead of one, unless I'm missing a treaty link somewhere. This all started out with "because we feel like it" / manufactured CBs with MK on CSN, and NG on RIA. VE is not tied to either of those alliances.
The only reason for SF/GOD to ask VE to hit MK or NG is so that VE could be used by SF to do damage without counters from Umb/GOONS/Deinos. In other words, VE was asked to be a horribly ally, and offense was taken when VE refused. -
It still blows my mind that VE was even asked to hit AAs allied VE's other MD-level allies. And was expected to just go along with it! They have three MD-level treaties on the MK end of the war, and the GOD treaty on the SF end. VE took the respectable position of only going in on a D clause in this crock of a war, and in return they are vilified by the SF side for not allowing themselves to be used in the way SF wanted on an oA clause? Remember, they could just as easily used the oA clauses on those other three treaties to go in against SF.
-
[quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1342293113' post='3010189']
To be honest, VE might as well have stayed out and it'd have had the same overall impact because even their target alliance wasn't damaged
[/quote]
I believe NPO would take issue with that. Dropping from 10.9 million to 8.6 million is more than a 20% drop. They got damaged. -
Ok, since the SF side seems to think throwing in all the micros will make a difference, I just pulled ALL the nations from the list in the ASR thread.
[url=https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ago11P8_ESDNdDlISmd5T0VvZTExSHpJa3hVdXVWSkE#gid=1]The Data[/url]
The sheet has everything you need to break it down by AA, if you want to get all huffy with "RAWR MY AA WOULD NEVAR DO THAT." Copy and fiddle away.
If you want peace mode over time, these sheets would need to be pulled over time. I don't care that much about this to do so.
tl;dr:
Dolan has 74.51% of nation strength, 75.28% of nations in war mode.
Gooby has 40.26% of nation strength, 62.28% of nations in war mode.
Also, to this nation: [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=32247]this smug !@#$%^& right here[/url]. I hate that you have a comma in your ruler name. -
Rush, next time you want to do this, ping me. You can get the same stuff in about 10 minutes.
-
Calm down Brehon, he's talking about INT not defending LSF.
-
Congrats on peace to our allies. Now try to catch up
-
[quote name='Auctor' timestamp='1341815702' post='3007155']
this is shocking. im shocked.
[/quote]
Yep. Quite shocking that it is even necessary to confirm this. But the kids in the back of the classroom were not paying attention, so teacher had to repeat it. -
[quote name='The Pansy' timestamp='1341812354' post='3007124']
What's wrong with NG?
[/quote]
Took the words out of my mouth. NG has been quite successful, seems he is wishing us to fail.
Keep wishing. -
Nom nom nom.
Everybody was wondering who was next. One by one, all will fall!
Welcome to our organization, BTA o/ -
The very first pinned topic in this forum. Has every alliance, their forum, their IRC, and a link to the wiki with more information than you could possibly process.
You're welcome. -
[quote name='Devilyn Caster' timestamp='1341683217' post='3006016']
Well there goes our sanction
[/quote]
Whoops.
[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1341684446' post='3006024']
do you believe they should blindly obey your no CB wars and attack those they have no grudge with?
[/quote]
Pretty sure it's this. That's fine though. We'll keep doing our thing, and they can fight their own battles for once. Oh. Wait...
Imperial Roman Empire Announcement
in Tournament Edition Open World Forum
Posted
[quote name='Eric F' timestamp='1351502225' post='3046347']
I have seen the lowest of the low and almost the highest of the high in te. RE is what they are. They typically down declare every time then make up excuses, in my specific case I was shocked as the two that declared on me were with in 10% ns.....I thought I was going to need a medic......none the less as usual they have been delt with and now they have turtled........again no shock there but really RE an equal fight?(2 to 1 but even ns) What happened? I dont know if I should congratulate you of feel sorry for you because even at 2 to 1 it was an unfair fight to my advantage......better luck next war.
[/quote]
You can call it down-declare all you like. Does not make it any more true. I've come to learn that certain parties will always call terrible any war RE chooses to wage.
You are not worth listening to. How about enjoying a good war, rather than complaining anytime someone decides to declare on you?