Jump to content

Sir Keshav IV

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,323

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Sir Keshav IV

  2. [DBDC/DT] Honored and Roll overs

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Sir Keshav IV

     

     

     

     

     

    Has LoSS been helping manage your treaties lately?

     

    Also are you saying you dont have a MADP with DBDC or is that all you can come back with?

     

    Treaty or not, it's besides the point that SCM is still the MoD, SCM is a dual member, and SCM is a DT Government Member attacking aligned nations.

     

    You may want to give up already, and join your other two alliance mates in making a joke of it. It's the only thing that will hold up at this point. The point has already been proven. 

     
     
    This thread isn't about DT. That was a side statement that was nit picked in it. White peace was worked of that scenario and I have no problem with DT. Stop.

     

     

    Well according to Piejonk we should roll with this whole theory of a MADP with DBDC. Rolling with that then :v:

     

    EDIT: If you still can't see it, we have a tri and government member saying it isn't. Stop trying to say it so otherwise. 

  3. [DBDC/DT] Honored and Roll overs

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

     

     

     

     

    I hate it when I know more about people's alliances then they do. It makes me feel so smart, but kind of creepy too. Anyways you have a MADP. The questioning of if you had a dual citizenship was based off of one person's allegations in the thread. Also, StarcraftMatzer was confirmed as being your MoD by your triumvirate as well as a member of DBDC. I was simply asking if your allies were aware that DT Gov't is attacking other aligned nations.

     

    It also wasn't recent. It's been there a few months. According to your nation you're one of the Templars in DT...

     

    Heres your wiki page to see your treaties.

    Heres DBDC's wiki to see the treaty you have with them from their standpoint.

     

    EDIT: What in the hell kind of world do we live in? First LoSS, VE, and IRON. Now DT is having FA confusions.

     

    Yes I am a Templar. We have no confusions whatsoever. Like SOM said our High Templar of Defense must just be collecting information on Cuba!

  12. IRON Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Less than a year ago, IRON held the following treaties with major/big alliances:

    -TOP

    -NPO

    -Umbrella

    -NG

    -AI

     

    Only the final two remain, and QH's comment from early in this thread wasn't exactly torrid for IRON. (IRON's path, as opposed to AI/NPO's?!) NG obviously has commitments all over the place, as the last war showed. It's all fine and good for IRON to want to pursue this independent path, but in this game, you need people with you at all times. Exactly who is supposed to be on this path with IRON?

     

    Stewie. He's the bomb.

  13. IRON Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Many in AI joined because it was bright, shiny, and new.

     

    AI was a populist movement and without the core values that make successful alliances, you get what AI is today.

     

    Wrong. Ai was intended to be a merger of similar alliances. In the end one part had a different view to the other and hence its split with those who believed differently left. It was best for everyone involved I guess.  

     

    The extended war was a stupid clause that was an embarrassing addition to an already embarrassing outcome to a war where Ai failed entirely in the peace terms. Thats more due to NPO doing what it did which alienated quite a few of us. 

     

    At the end of the day I'm actually happy that IRON decided to cut away from alliances that has a divergent FA path to themselves. 

     

    Also hi Mia :O 

  15. I have a question about EQ

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    AI dodged around half the wars since Karma so the infra-hugging claim does kind of stick

     

    Dodged? I hope you know the alliances that made up Ai has fought in nearly every single war up until Dave? Olympus fought in PB-NpO, all 3 of our alliance fought the next war. The only war we sat out was the last one so it doesn't really stick. Please I know you're looking for any way to make Ai look bad, but calling us infra-huggers is possibly the stupidest way of going about that. 

     

    Oh also Umbrella being hit doesn't necessarily make them victims like Doch said. I just think we made the best out of a situation that ended up giving everyone a war they wanted right? 

  18. Why the War?

    in Open World RP

    Posted


    Some say you are defending yourselves.  They are simply touting the party line that justifies their sides point of view because they need to think that they are defending against some DH agression.  They have a victimhood complex.  Some don't, such as those who have flat out owned up to attacking us because they wanted to and we gave a reason. 

     

    Using what you said I have a question, do you agree that the reason we're at war is because of the Puppets incident i.e the reason you gave us? So thats why we're at war aren't we? :P ( Now if that made no sense apologies, 4 AM and studying for finals that begin in a few hours xD )

     

    Also Tick I'll comb through the thread later and see if there is anything to refute :P 

  19. Why the War?

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by Sir Keshav IV

    and yet you guys did aggressively attack us, ironic how that turns out. 

     

    Some would say we are defending ourselves, others say we're on the aggressive but I'm pretty sure it wasn't premeditated. I don't believe it was premeditated anyway. Thats my opinion. It occurred because of the puppets incident otherwise I doubt we would have attacked you folks in the given time frame.

  20. Why the War?

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by Sir Keshav IV

    Contingency plans were made primarily with one purpose in mind, wait for the right time to roll DH. It was not for self defense, it was not in case DH decided to roll anyone else, plans were being drafted months ago, when we literally cared nothing for AI. You and a few other aa's made plans with the sole purpose to roll DH at a later date, whether or not it was going to come tomorrow or now is by the by. Yes any alliance would have plans to deal with potential aggressors, but the animosity, the various plans on the mass scale to to deal with umb, the diplo work behind the background, your sides leader statements saying they were planning to deal with umb and just waiting for the right time is by no means contingency plans put in case DH comes for you. AI, NPO and tio made plans to knock down DH, specifically umbrella to get a shot at MK. I mean the various statements coming from you lot months ago saying they were coming for us just goes to show that.

     

    I'm not bothered by your war against us, I do welcome it, but please stop blaming it on the puppets hypothesis to make yourselfs in the right. War was drafted because you boys wanted a shot at us, simple as that. You been wanting a shot for a long time, now you got the opportunity. I love fighting cifica, brings me great joy, waited for this moment for a long time. But by no means is neither side any sort of honourable alliance or in the right during this conflict. 

     

    I believe the man in charge of our Foreign Affairs just told you he ( and by extension Ai ) did not have any plans to aggressively attack Umbrella. 

     

    Other then that since you really haven't said anything else but the same nonsense even after a couple of us have told you otherwise means there really isn't any point arguing. Have fun spinning your shit :)

  21. Why the War?

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    Can we all agree that any competent alliance would contingency plans and that you folks had some sort of idea at least if a war did occur how to go about handling it? At least it'd lesson the nonsense being spewed in this thread. We believed you folks were out for our necks and prepared for it and I would be surprised if you folks outright deny that you did not have plans either. 

     

    Also I doubt as an alliance we have any "beef" with Umbrella apart from the Puppets issue ( if there is more I must have missed it <_< apologies ) and your diplomats on our forums could attest to the cordial nature of interaction we've had since our inception. I really don't believe having defensive plans in the case of any situation arising means we were actively looking to roll Umbrella. I disagree with that notion entirely. On the other hand I do believe that Puppets was the second time an incident like that was happening to us and our government decided to react aggressively to it. 

×
×
  • Create New...