The Baby Eater

The ironic part of this is that if it was the NPO holding TPF at war for three months then requiring fairly sizable terms from a war torn and shattered alliance, we'd probably hearing these same people arguing for the terms proclaiming how evil the NPO was for doing such to an alliance that entered the war knowing full well what would happen just to support an ally. You can't play the "We're fighting for an end to curbstomps and heavy reparations... and we'll get around to trying that right after we get done getting our heavy reperations from this curbstomp" game and honestly not expect people to call a spade a spade there.

Apparently, the voices on morality in CN collectively decided that the benchmark for fair terms is asking the upper tier nations for more tech than the entire alliance has in addition to somewhere in the neighborhood of 16.5 million per member of an alliance mostly at ZI and deep into bill lock after months of war.

I, The Baby Eater, surrender to NATO.