Jump to content

TheThirdMark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    234

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by TheThirdMark

  3. An Ultimatum to iFOK

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    How difficult is it for you to understand that I have forgiven you? MHA is now in the wrong, and not iFOK. You may go home my child.

    Hence the fact Im with FOK. And not iFok. Though in this case swapping Alliances could get fun.

    And you should understand that taking the high road and ignoring me will paint a much more favorable picture of your alliance than going to war of a few ill-chosen words on my part would. Yes, wars have been fought for less, and I do not deny that, however, when you go to war for such a small reason, many people will think less of you for it.

    NPO did go to war for an even smaller reason. Look how far it brought them.

  5. An Ultimatum to iFOK

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    I can assure you that I am no coward and am prepared to die for this most noble cause. I can only pray that my friends and allies, on the other hand, do not abandon me on the eve of battle. If that is the case, do not for one moment believe I shall yield, for I shall charge the gauntlet alone if I must, and iFOK shall know my wrath.

    This thread is now the Best Epic Fail 2009.

  7. Sign up for the "Go Out With A Bang" organisation

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    Did anyone else wonder if Denniswerf was the leader of BnT's legendary gang of anti-ODN rogues?

    No. I dont think anyone else is wondering this. Denniswerf has always been one of the players I uphold the most. For his knowledge, game skills and the ways he can give advise. You mentioning this is the first.

    I called no one a bad person. I'm only saying that those who destroy the efforts of others for "fun" shouldn't be bragging about it.

    I personally honor the work someone but into their nation/alliance, regardless of the fact its all pixels.

    Being victorious in War gives you the right to brag. At least, some think. And btw, you said Honor.

    /me shivers really really really hard.

    Why play a game that involves war and destruction of nations then :huh:

    Its only because QFT gave me a warning once that Im putting some text here. Welcome in a game that endorses violence and massacres. (how else can you explain a NUKE on ones nation).

    LOL. How about no? Believe me, I enjoy war. But when I go rogue (for the umpteenth time) I prefer, as I always have, to do my own thing, my own way and pick my own targets. Roguery is a special zone of this game. It's another way to play. I don't plan on leaving any time soon, but who knows when I'll go rogue. :P Probably before that.

    My point is, when I do it, it's a pin point, coordinated move that's been planned for quite a while. It's not random stirring. Roguery without a cause is lame, and roguery when you're just lead into it by someone else who you barely know is weak.

    I have to agree with you 100%.

    Thats why I think that, even considering the fact that I do not like it, GOWAB can have some serious success. Planned rogue with many nations.

    I think, and am rather sure, that I will never go Rogue. Im not that known on CN but the players that do know me will always link my name to FOK. Since that is the only Alliance I have ever been in and I tend to keep it that way. My nation will only keep to exist to aid my fellow players that still love this game. Though only nations that have proved the loyalty it needs to defend an Alliance in need or an Alliance member in need.

    See, this attitude is part of the problem.

    What's the point of building up that proper nation? To make it a monument to you being able to log in a few times a week and be in an alliance that's managed to duck out of any major wars without taking one straight to the mug?

    What a horrible bore. Build that nation up and fight it. There's no other point to this game when it comes down to it. You can have your community whether your nation is a 1000000 NS or 100.

    WOOT!!!!!!!!! You are very correct. A nation is completed when the owner thinks it is. Might be when you reach 15K infra, all Wonders (for me actually the only goal in the game, after that my life ends Im afraid), gaining rank 1 or by having a lot of fun (my true reason to play) with fellow Dutch men.

    Electron Sponge, I just added 1 Kudo to your total.

    There is little incentive to go to war when a week of war can destroy a year worth of nation development.

    Welcome to Cyber Nations. You know, there is a game to players that dont like their stuff destroyed. Its called ''The Sims''.

    If you like. :awesome:

    The point is that there's no set victory conditions. You can pretty much do what you want in this game; it doesn't have an ending, and there's no inherent point to it. Just different things that you can do.

    My reaction here is the exact reaction to the post by Electron Sponge. Without the Kudo though. I keep that for the damage done by your WRC :lol1:

    Yes, the current response is a deterrent. It is, as Blue and yourself said, the reason people wait until they have nothing to lose. I'm also willing to bet that should there be a smaller deterrent than ZI, the amount of rogues would increase dramatically. If you want a 1v1, I suggest asking for a duel rather than going rogue. Some people might be up for it.

    Good day. :)

    The only real reason I have you in my post is my unfolded love for TOP.

    Hugs!

    Hmn, to prevent misinterpretation let me explain some. As you said some players might be up to it. But I think there will be 50 rogues on each player wanted to pick up the handkerchief .

    And btw for Duke: The Smurfs were nothing but Amateurs B)

  8. Sign up for the "Go Out With A Bang" organisation

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by TheThirdMark

    Right on the edit.

    Also I did still nuke you every single day I was allowed to, and ended up with about a dozen warheads still in the bank when we left the war.

    Now let me huggle my WRC again. :)

    Took you 4 tries each day before hitting me. And the last 2 days you didnt nuke me but your WRC-less brother in arms (which I really didnt mind since that WRC really really really hurts).

    Actually the only war ive been in currently where it stopped that many nukes.

    The ZI is a defacto death sentence for most people anyway - would you bother to rebuild after a couple of nukes resulted in the loss of 10k infra? I know a stupid punishment like that would put me off playing.

    Im eager to test this.

    /me presses softly the ''Fire'' button.

  16. Imperial Decree from the New Pacific Order

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    The thing Im about to say is stricktly my opinion and not my Alliances or the other Alliances opinion that are Karma-sided.

    Huge Rep demands are not for rebuilding. In case it ever did cover the costs of war it was sheer luck or agreed between the Alliances in that conflict. In my opinion its for two reasons:

    1. Other Alliances can grow a bit harder where the NPO cant. Simply because they have to send Cash/Tech. It will slow them down. Not stop them.

    2. They serve as a lesson. When you ask unusual Reps you are bound to be offered them in a later stage yourself. Oh wait, Karma.

    Reason 1 I endorse fully. The NPO should be booted out the Sanction Race and be kept out for a month or so. In a month a lot can change and the NPO can prove its fellow BoB citizens that they indeed believe in change. I hear many NPO-members saying here that its not their fault that the NPO did what it did. Even though I can understand the sentiment in that (no member approves all that is done by their Gov) its weird that they continue to be in an Alliance for so long where the same facts happened over and over.

    Reason 2 though I disagree on a few points. Not the high Reps but the hight of it (with that I mean the extra addition for the nations hiding in Peace) in total.

    Even though the amount can be reached easy (NPO has at least 20B cash) it offends me to raise it with that amount each day. Normally the goal will justify the meanings. But if this continues the meanings will destroy the goal.

  22. whats up with this

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    Although I approve of lightly teasing NPO and do so on a regular basis in #nsa, I do not approve of CNF threads where the entire purpose is to humiliate an alliance and rub their faces in their defeat.

    True. Things that are that obvious dont need to be put under the spotlights. They glow of themselves.

×
×
  • Create New...