Jump to content

Lusitan

Members
  • Posts

    1,918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lusitan

  1. Agreed. In this post, I'm agreeing with my alliance-mate. 

     

    Conventional wisdom tells us that the original aggressor aggresses due to confidence in their ultimate victory. In the OP, though, we see Umbrella, the original aggressor, surrendering. In subsequent posts, however, we see attempts by the surrendering party to negate said surrender and thereby restore the established tradition of aggressors winning the day.

     

    We also see in various posts, people claiming strategic victory in part due to the absence of reparations. On the other hand, a concurrent discussion attempts to show the leniency of the hegemony that was (or some will say is) Doom House. In that discussion, some extol the virtues of said hegemony in their taking of little-to-no reps when victorious.

     

    It leaves one wondering why DH is lenient and virtuous when requiring little-to-no reps and yet others face a different standard.

     

    Whomever first said it was absolutely correct:  CN: A Double Standards Game 

     

    It does get annoying when people over-analyze shit.

  2. So potential of more fun when GOONs surrender to Sparta? :-)

     

    Surrendering is irrelevant at this point. When you allow someone from the opposing coalition to claim he is one of the Kings, arrange a coalition war and then sucessfully declare it... I mean I don't think it has ever happened before to go this far down. What are they gonna say if it comes down to a surrender, "yeah we won that war but our enemies were impersonating us in our own coalition channel and declaring war on our behalf"?

     

    EDIT: Correction, it wasn't even an impersonation, claiming to be a Stratephor has nothing to do with Sparta lol

  3. At the risk of incorrectly giving you the impression it actively annoys me, it doesnt. It doesnt make things the slightest bit harder because we track the nations individually, doh. I do think it's a pretty shady (OOC:OOC) tactic but whatever. It's completely useless so have at it. All it does is reset your alliance join date later.
     

     

    Your nations can't even properly enter peace mode, don't blame us for thinking you will suck at something more complex and actively trying to exploit it.

  4. Nah, the self proclaimed ball-less leader and your own DH buddies say otherwise.

    You can cry me a river with your bleeding heart appeals, but we put up with that Umb b.s. for years. Frankly idgaf anymore.

     


    You seem to confuse fighting the most with fighting efficiently. It's true he failed at supporting you, but frankly he was the only one trying.

  5. Dear NPO,

     

    Please smash their faces into the ground, and keep JA warm for me!

     

    Best regards,

    -E32

     

    EDIT: DAPHOQUE? NO FORMATTING? WHAT IS THIS BULLHONKEY?

    EDIT 2: Ok there it is. dat jacked.

     

    You're an idiot. There were few people who fought as much as JA so you wouldn't be thrown to the wolves in the first XX/SF war. What happened to you is the responsibility of alot of people but certainly not JA's.
     

  6. I for one would like to thank my Umbrella opponent (Decker) for engaging me in the 17th most destructive conflict of this war involving thousands. Now while I believe that at this point Umbrella is simply rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic with the inevitable conclusion at hand, I must confess a certain admiration for not letting the flag touch the ground.

     

    We can keep doing this for months!
     

  7. The stats in the OP don't mean a lot to me, but those Umbrella nations trying to hide under different AA's just look like Umbrella nations who are trying to hide in order to avoid a beatdown.  If you expected to win, you wouldn't feel the need to hide.


     

     

    If you'd rather think our nations are trying to avoid a beatdown please do it at your own expense and risk. We're not exactly concerned about the image we project towards the shit alliances of CN.

  8. No that's ok. You can keep your 2+2=tree logic. 

     

    And I did see where you lured young innocent Gearhead into your evil club. Sadly he will be torn apart by the proletariat hordes that await the rest of your ilk. 

     

    GearHead has been an instrumental part of the destruction of AI :P

  9. Are you kidding?  This is not a bloc and its allies.  This is everybody.  It is not our fault that you all have pissed off all of Planet Bob and they all want to burn you and your buddies.  This is not a hegemony controlling its meatshields, this a 100% Planet Bob is coming for you.  You know those angry mobs are not always easy to control.   

     

    And that's why when we are through with you there won't be anything left :)

  10. Again you prove you have no idea what I said. Instead you are content to close your ears and scream about how everyone else is dumb. We can go back and forth arguing over who has a greater intellectual capacity, but it still does not answer why you believe NG would betray us in the first place. Maybe since Umbrella is used to abandoning allies you assume NG would. Maybe it's wishful thinking. Maybe it's a veiled attempt at verbally attacking NG. Which is it?

     

    You were the one calling people dumb lol

     

    Anyway, I did not state NG would betray whatever side, I stated we did not consider NG traitors and we consider you cowards and idiots. It's that simple.

     

     

  11. The nation in question is: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=131386

     

     

    2hhgcok.png

     

    It shows 730% soldier efficiency when Defcon is 3. Doing the math it should add up only to ~630% taking in account coal trade and government communism in Defcon 1. My question is, where is he getting the extra 163k soldiers.

     

    I might be wrong though, if anyone can point out if I made a mistake I'll greatly appreciate.

  12. Then you're dumber than I thought. That post was pretty damn simple.

     

    That implies you are qualified to evaluate someone's intelligence. As simple as the post was, it was, at best, a lame attempt to cause whatever type of reaction on any NG member reading this or, at worst, a senseless statement. It was really lame though, because it didn't extrapolate from facts, it just resulted from spinning posts that meant absolutely nothing to seemingly support the purpose of your post.

     

    Maybe you have actually been inactive for that long. Or maybe you have always sucked. I am pretty sure though that doesn't make me dumb nor you intelligent. Quite the opposite.

×
×
  • Create New...