Jump to content

Wyrmon

Members
  • Posts

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Wyrmon

  1. Welcome to Bob! This is what has happened for the past 7 global wars at least.


    It's strange to see the peace mode coalition ignore the entire post-Karma history of CN and complain about spying, making fun of losing alliances, and moral hypocrisy. Please continue though, it's cute

    Please point out where anyone is CnG has ever done this?  I'll wait.  CnG does not, and has never, condoned spying especially of this sort that serve no tactical or political purpose other than rubbing your opponents nose in the dirt.  I like the argument though, that because somebody, somewhere made fun of a losing alliance that justifies it in all cases.  Nice logic and nice world you guys are building here.  

     

    Also, thanks for welcoming me to Bob.  I guess I missed my welcoming committee those 6 years ago when I, you know, actually joined Bob.  

  2. I ran the numbers a while back and Magicninja is right, the % of available defensive slots filled for GATO has been much less than for any other CnG alliance.  They just weren't being targeted as much, so you would expect a lower % NS lost.  

     

    Also, it makes sense to post a TWiX-type expose when you are on the losing side of a war and are trying to build political capital.  This publication, however, I just don't see the point.  It feels cheap and immature to try and kick an alliance on the losing side of war.  Is it just a way to stroke the ego?  

  3. Time to change CnG name to HnG(Hippies and Grievances)?

     

    Apart from being a very poor joke (you can do better), it doesn't even logically follow from any honest assessment of the statistics presented in this thread.   

  4. This seems to be saying that 51% of TLR/GATO/ODN nations over 25k hit PM at the start of the war and have never come out. Why would you fight with only half your strength if not preservation?

     

    This seems to be what the OP is trying to say.  However, this is a completely nonsensical way to interpret these data.

  5. Go ahead, then, big boy: Sanction EQ again.

     


     

    Within hours of our sanctions, you came running to our coalition, asked what we wanted, were told, and did it.  If that's your definition of a "decisive failure" I'll take them all week.

    If you don't like being "pissed on" while you're "vulnerable" then I'd suggest getting your shit together rathen than continuing to sob on my sleeve.  You're stewing in your own pot.

     

    Sanction EQ again.

    And you have the unmitigated temerity to brazenly flaunt your own moral double standard and claim it as a victory in a terribly cliche "ends justify the means" pastiche.  Truly a great new world order you are building.  

  6. Too bad for rush that his propaganda thread failed in the 2nd page. Well done Stealthkill.

    Rush, you need to try harder. 

     

    Data manipulation to try and prove a point is not a job well done.  There is no truly justifiable reason to ignore certain NS ranges in this data set other than making the data conform to your biases.  Rush presented the totality of the data, Stealthkill attempted a post hoc data massage to exclude data he deems (arbitrarily) to be irrelevant.

     

    D34th, I would say you need to try harder, but I'm afraid this is probably your limit.  Sorry for that mate.  

  7. Oh I see, there's multiple. Still, The sig shortchanges CnG if it's worn by any of their allies presently getting rolled. Given that Goons has a MDoAP with TLR, and given that the bloc is getting rolled for them, I'd be offended if I saw goons sporting that sig.

     

     

    I'm thinking you wouldn't last long in CnG if THAT is all it takes to offend you.

  8. Just to make it clear, here is would I would like from the ODN. Either A a public apology and 9 million dollars for the x=zieing of Hulk land or B a reason why they don't need to apologe.

     

     

    Option A is a pretty good deal ODN.  I suggest you take it before things turn ugly.

  9. I don't know if Hoo and Kait left due to the horrible posts done on MK's board.

    I do know that there were horrible posts about MK's boards. That's good enough to earn you a rolling.

     

     

    Weren't you just, like on the same page as this quote, saying your side won't be as bad as you were before?  

     

    Fast forward one post, "Ugh!  Me no likey your boards!  Me roll you!"

  10. You're too late for the party, but what makes you think that I hit TLR? Unless Tyga declared while I was sleeping, you're suffering hallucinations probably caused for the centrifugal force of your spin. 

     

    Edit: Now if you're referring about Polaris and their defense of Sparta, it's nice to see that in your point of view defending an ally and honor a treaty is a mistake. Not surprising at all. 

    If Sparta requested help from treaty partners than, I'll say it again, you can't fault NpO etc. for this move.  However, in regards to coalition warfare it was a stupid thing to do and Sparta should not have requested a counter to TLR.  This is basic strategy.

×
×
  • Create New...