Jump to content

Wyrmon

Members
  • Posts

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wyrmon

  1. I remember the old "Nerdiest Treaty Ever" uniting Gondor with LOST. I have always enjoyed the treaty between our alliances and wish you all luck wherever you end up.
  2. Please don't, he doesn't need his ego artificially inflated any more! I'm sorry :(
  3. Congrats Hooligans. I don't know many from this lineup, a problem I will have to rectify.
  4. Please point out where anyone is CnG has ever done this? I'll wait. CnG does not, and has never, condoned spying especially of this sort that serve no tactical or political purpose other than rubbing your opponents nose in the dirt. I like the argument though, that because somebody, somewhere made fun of a losing alliance that justifies it in all cases. Nice logic and nice world you guys are building here. Also, thanks for welcoming me to Bob. I guess I missed my welcoming committee those 6 years ago when I, you know, actually joined Bob.
  5. I ran the numbers a while back and Magicninja is right, the % of available defensive slots filled for GATO has been much less than for any other CnG alliance. They just weren't being targeted as much, so you would expect a lower % NS lost. Also, it makes sense to post a TWiX-type expose when you are on the losing side of a war and are trying to build political capital. This publication, however, I just don't see the point. It feels cheap and immature to try and kick an alliance on the losing side of war. Is it just a way to stroke the ego?
  6. Apart from being a very poor joke (you can do better), it doesn't even logically follow from any honest assessment of the statistics presented in this thread.
  7. This seems to be what the OP is trying to say. However, this is a completely nonsensical way to interpret these data.
  8. NpO have actually all been quality opponents for me this war. I've been pleasantly surprised.
  9. I am a man of many words, yet this has left me speechless.
  10. Was this intentional irony? Because if so, good show mate.
  11. And you have the unmitigated temerity to brazenly flaunt your own moral double standard and claim it as a victory in a terribly cliche "ends justify the means" pastiche. Truly a great new world order you are building.
  12. This is pretty sloppy work from R&R. If they have any class they should be sending reps, and an apology, your way.
  13. Data manipulation to try and prove a point is not a job well done. There is no truly justifiable reason to ignore certain NS ranges in this data set other than making the data conform to your biases. Rush presented the totality of the data, Stealthkill attempted a post hoc data massage to exclude data he deems (arbitrarily) to be irrelevant. D34th, I would say you need to try harder, but I'm afraid this is probably your limit. Sorry for that mate.
  14. I'm thinking you wouldn't last long in CnG if THAT is all it takes to offend you.
  15. Option A is a pretty good deal ODN. I suggest you take it before things turn ugly.
  16. So you admit that R&R is going down in flames?
  17. Weren't you just, like on the same page as this quote, saying your side won't be as bad as you were before? Fast forward one post, "Ugh! Me no likey your boards! Me roll you!"
  18. Absolutely disgusted! Its almost as bad as Vault Boy kicking baby Sparta and Fear Boner propaganda!
  19. If Sparta requested help from treaty partners than, I'll say it again, you can't fault NpO etc. for this move. However, in regards to coalition warfare it was a stupid thing to do and Sparta should not have requested a counter to TLR. This is basic strategy.
×
×
  • Create New...