Jump to content

Sandwich Controversy

Banned
  • Posts

    2,926
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sandwich Controversy

  1. To: sandwich controversy    From: Karole    Date: 3/20/2013 12:00:02 AM

    Subject: Defeat Alert

     

    Message: Your nation has been defeated in battle. You do not have enough troops to defend your nation and your government has been thrown into Anarchy. You have lost all of your tanks, 5 spies, 41.66 infrastructure has been destroyed, 10.42 technology was lost and $5,000,000.00 of your money reserves was destroyed due to the invasion and resulting riots. What troops you did have deployed have also been returned home.
     

    To: sandwich controversy    From: Gyume Tenzen Konchog    Date: 3/20/2013 12:00:04 AM

    Subject: Defeat Alert

     

    Message: Your nation has been defeated in battle. You do not have enough troops to defend your nation and your government has been thrown into Anarchy. You have lost all of your tanks, 5 spies, 45.43 infrastructure has been destroyed, 11.36 technology was lost and $5,000,000.00 of your money reserves was destroyed due to the invasion and resulting riots. What troops you did have deployed have also been returned home.

     

     

    What caused this?

  2. When you turn on Mario Kart, you know what's the purpose of the game. If you get into multiplayer you expect to throw and eat shells, otherwise play in single player.

     

    However, what's the purpose of this game, Cyber Nations? There are a lot of different points of view about what this game is about. The purpose is to grown a nation? to grow an alliance? to grow a color sphere? To do tech deals and save warchest to blow one another at great wars fuelled by petty revenge separated from intervals of six months?

     

    The different ways of understanding the purpose of this game are among the most important sources of conflict here. And that's fine. We even get to discuss it at the forums and some people even find the purpose of their Game in waging a ideological war at the forums. Ok, sometimes it goes out of hand and some creep begins to stalk people OOC, but that's what the mods are for.

     

    What you can't expect any sane person to think is that the purpose of this game is to purposely stay at low NS in order to be able to enjoy brutalizing newbies. And brag about it. The better if you have nukes and they do not.

     

    What you can't expect me to belive is that it's normal that a teacher decides to run an activity for his students using this browser game, and there you have a bunch of people that as soon as they know about it, run there at full speed to sabotage their activity.

     

    Pardon me, but I can't help but think people like that have a good score of deep mental issues.

    Excuse me maybe you should [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive_realism]educate yourself[/url] on international relations before posting about them!!

  3. trades have always been seen as something holy, and the only time it's been justified to crash 6 nations' trades is when one of them goes off the handle and goes rogue. roguery has always been seen as something bad and has always been seen as the only reason to touch something as sacrilegious as trades.

     

    even when beaten down to ZI/ZT, with the right trade set you can atleast rebuild yourself to a certain point of where you were before so long as you have the money to do so.

     

    senators are elected by the masses to use said powers against such nations and to perform in a way agreeable by those who chose to vote for them (usually). This is not to say certain instances like this thread come about, but usually they are met with fierce opposition by the community (honestly if this happened to almost anyone other than HoT that's what we'd be seeing here today)

    Yeah but think about who o ya baby's voter base is.

×
×
  • Create New...