After a war, should the losing party just tell all their friends to go to hell and suck up to whoever beat them? Should they just attempt to treaty to everyone so that way they can ensure they will survive whatever conflict might come next?
I am not really understanding what people are looking for an alliance to do after is loses a war. If they ditch their treaty partners who have stood by them for sometimes years just to suck the teet of whoever just won, they will get ridiculed for doing just that. However, if they do nothing, they get told they are a joke of an alliance because their leadership didn't change sides. Is this just something that will always be? The losers will be told they suck as an alliance no matter what?
This just doesn't make sense to me. Can anyone clue me in on what an alliance is actually supposed to do once they surrender? I know sometimes, allies are gained through mutual respect gained fighting on opposite sides. Other times, hatred is forged.
- Read more...
- 13 comments
- 334 views