[quote]2. There were no more than a few Hellas members who constantly do donations. The fast growth is due to our nice preparation since the end of previous round, ready trades, building plan etc.[/quote]
We all saw the numbers. I asked you not to patronize us and yet you have.
[quote]P.S. We are the most popular! Look the interest our threads usually create in this and previous rounds.[/quote]
Looking at the other threads, you're not “the most popular” because people like you, but because you provoke them into arguing with you. They're drawn to you in the same way that people are drawn to stare at train wrecks. Like in this case, where you come on and start a thread about how great you are that you slaughtered a smaller alliance with no nukes.
[quote]
the 45:26 is including the fact that we had 8 nations or so that had not even grown since the first day let alone fight so that bring it down to 37:26, we then had 4 more nations completely inactive so that's 33:26 and then had another 3 nations who simply did not go to war and decided to just tech raid instead. 30:26.
[/quote]
Okay, we get it, your alliance sucks. That still doesn't address the 50:0 nuke ratio.
[quote]
It is ok for TPC nations to be upset,
[/quote]
No one said TPC was upset (you may not have noticed that I'm not in TPC). TPC is actually handling this situation very well, especially considering that they’re being punished for having the audacity to win the last round.
[quote]
"you started Turtling from day 1 , and up till now , all you do is lunching your Cruise missiles ."
[/quote]
Listen, here's the bottom line: You're saying TPC had this attack coming because they went to war with smaller alliances and they weren’t truthful about everything. Yet this thread shows that you've done BOTH of those things. Not in the last round, but right here in this round.
A stronger alliance ought to take YOU down, and they will, now that you're weakened from fighting TPC.