Jump to content

d3mon

Members
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by d3mon

  1.  

    I ran GLoF's milcom in Equilibrium, bcortell and hartfw ran all of TOP front. It's a whole lot more authoritative coming from us than dude that glanced at TOP's first page every now and then and kinda remembers.

     

    I agree, TOP's front was one of the best fought in EQ.

     

     
    It's this simple if you like PM so much, stay there! If you really object to PM then leave. 
     

     

    So, how long are those nations supposed to stay in PM? Forever?

     

    I love how you decided to pick one of the meanings of reparation to argue that this is indeed different. I will provide another definition

     

    "Something that is done or given as a way of correcting a mistake that you have made or a bad situation that you have caused."

    (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reparation)

     

    While, I share the frustration that you expressed with NPO's actions in EQ. It looks like you are trying to punish NPO for not letting you destroy their banks (and their ability to rebuild), which is rather strange as you confessed that they are not the primary target of this war.

  2.  

    But honestly, I expect nothing from you except to tell people fighting twice as hard as IRON to fight harder, and ignoring the people in the past that did fight for IRON.  Whats clear is you should keep posting more often then you are.

     

    In CS's defense, I don't think he was trying to belittle your contributions in EQ or Sengoku in anyway.

     

    Anyhow, its good to see the unity of the NpO-TOP coalition, I can't help but wonder how long it will last until it self implodes.

  3. Lies, IRON has provoked others there charter is bent on WAR! There very alliance is focused on WAR! Sooner or later you smaller alliances will have to deal with IRON as it seeks to plunder and steal from smaller alliances and nations. IRON is a agressive, Hostile and out of control alliance and must be destroyed. This individul is a puppet of that Alliance spreading lies.

     

    You have made me see the light. Its time to destroy IRON.

  4. 4) Roman Empire  19 nukes compared to OP's 6 nukes

     

     

     

     

    6) Ordo Paradoxia 7,443  +2000 average nation strength on RE

     

    On the OP blitz: 18 OP nations are in anarchy vs. 21 RE nations.  

     

     

     

    Either a horrible blitz by OP or good defense by RE on the anarchy count. I hate giving any compliments/credit to RE but I think it was that defense. I'm predicting a Roman victory based on the defense and nuke count. Really good DOW though. Voluntary suicide by OP!!!

     

    It looks like RE has lost ~100K NS from their peak and OP has lost ~80K NS. Also, unsurprisingly, RE has only has 2 nukes left, so it wouldn't surprise me if things started getting worse for RE from this point.

     

    I hope you don't change your mind and start calling it a down-declare.

  5. I'm interested in being respected, just not by you.

     

    Out of a desire to not derail this discussion any further, I'll clarify my implication as being that VE has avoided making huge sacrifices in the last two wars by making smaller ones, and leave it at that. 

     

    VE has lost significantly more than most alliances on DH side, I am not sure how their actions are impacting the peace negotiations but stating that VE didn't give it all is ridiculous.

     

    Both GATO and VE are fighting honorably, and with good intent.  They just have widely different, and incompatible, views of what the best strategy is and was.

     

    As long as everyone in the iC was on the same page, I agree that this is probably the most correct and respectful assessment of the situation. Which one was more honorable is rather debatable.

  6. He's right, for what it's worth. You can attempt to play off your "strategy" as honorable all you'd like, but in truth, there are only two scenarios in which VE's wartime behavior makes sense. In the first scenario, your alliance was unaware that this was intended to be a war of attrition, and decided against using peace mode out of ignorance. In the second, your alliance was attempting to duck out of the war at the earliest available opportunity, and taking a ton of damage by virtue of not using peace mode provided a convenient excuse to do so, as it did when you so valiantly rose to the defense of GOD for two weeks. Your strategy was neither brave nor honorable -- it was stupid, and intentionally so. 

     

    VE's strategy isn't the most efficient way of fighting a war but it is definitely brave and honorable. I agree that the way they fought for GOD didn't actually help but they have been fighting for DH for the last couple of months and have done a hell of job. If I were you, I would much rather keep silent than come out in the open and let everyone know how little MK cares for the alliances in iC coalition. 

  7. As far as I know we're just getting credit for doing what was asked of us. You seem to be upset because no one is patting you on the back for going out and getting destroyed. We'll you didn't get destroyed on our behalf so like I said we don't owe you anything. 

     

    So, giving it all for allies is no longer worthy of praise ?? And fighting for one round in a war that lasted 2 months is doing it right?? I guess all of GATO could have stayed in PM and done even better.

  8. VE doesn't have much of a platform to criticize other alliances for stuff like this, just sayin'.

     

    With all due respect, VE fought on one of the toughest fronts of the war and since they didn't have any treaties that EQ had to tip toe around, they were overwhelmed since day 1.

    Of all the alliances on the iC side, I would say VE can rightfully criticize anyone and telling them to stfu, just because they aren't willing to help iC spin things is a little sad.

×
×
  • Create New...