Jump to content

Chickenzilla

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,893

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Chickenzilla

    Grand Global Alliance Statement

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    I'm going to repeat again on Page 5 here just for you

    Bilrow seems to be missing the whole point here.

    1. Habidaculus of the BAPS alliance attacked a person by the name of Whenua Kura who is on the BROWN TEAM and no Alliance Affiliation, I repeat, no Alliance Affiliation which is perfectly acceptable under the invisible rules of the game. If you're not aligned with any alliance, you open yourself to being attacked by anyone in the game.

    http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.as...&Extended=1

    The link here completely supports our argument.

    2. If Whenua Kura was indeed a member of the GGA alliance, he should have had his team color as GREEN instead of the BROWN color as well as the fact he should have his alliance affiliation as Grand Global Alliance or GGA. Either way, that would have signify the protection of the GGA over Whenua Kura. But Whenua Kura employed neither of these options.

    3. The public community may or may not have access to recruitments boards depending on how public every alliance are with their boards. But is it a responsibility of other alliances to check up on every board known for every alliance to check on if they're a member of such alliance? No, it isn't. It is the sole responsibility of the person of that nation to clearly mark that they belong to such alliance and the sole responsibility of such alliances to verify if they do indeed belong to that alliance.

    4. Bilrow seems to be going by the presumption that it is the responsibility of every alliance to check for members. However Whenua Kura was on the Brown team which could have led people ready to attack him to assume that he COULD belong to GATO and related alliances on the BROWN TEAM but would have yield zero results on any of their boards.

    5. Members of GOONS responded to protecting the BAPS alliance from GGA aggression because their attack was unwarranted whatsoever. GGA failed to provide any reasons for doing so because Whenua Kura was not properly masked on both options which the AA is most preferred.

    Bilrow, I suggest you fix your membership base to have them all wear the proper AA tag. Thank you very much.

    I have to say this is the smartest post I have seen in here.

    Grand Global Alliance Statement

    in Alliance Politics

    Posted

    Bilrow,

    With all due respect this guy dropped AA (and it wasn't a spelling error), wasn't in your team color, and wasn't flying your flag....so how can it be assumed that he's still a member? Because he signed up on the forums? That seems to be an overly broad definition of "member." Seems to me that unless he was ordered to drop AA and he dropped AA on his own, then his rights and protection as a member should have been terminated.

    What if he didn't officially resign? What if he was a member long enough to spai on the GGA?

    Bilrow, you know I have the utmost respect for you and our allies in the GGA, but this just seems to be a very weak case and this thread is particularly inflammatory for no particular reason.

    At this point, I'd like to suggest that BAPS, GOONS, and GGA leadership take it to PRIVATE CHANNELS FTW.

    Slayer..... did you have to go ahead and use the Private Channels FWT. thing

    it's implyed

×
×
  • Create New...