-
Posts
1,282 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Sabcat
-
-
A DoS for an alliance whose DoW degenerated into an argument about coups and the legitimacy of their leadership. Sublime, ridiculous or both?
-
[quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1317902167' post='2818360']
Not really. I am too liberal (proper liberal, not how silly americans use it) to be a commie.
[/quote]
A liberal - Someone who wants everything to be nice but lacks the historical and structural understanding to know why it isn't already -
[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1317895065' post='2818300']
Ah yes, lack of class. A lovely vague way to insinuate your enemies are Bad People who Must Be Stopped, despite having no defensible basis for arguing so.
[/quote]
It is a subjective judgement. Others will view events and make their own judgement on your behaviour and the way you have presented yourselves. -
[quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1317895154' post='2818303']
Oh I was going of his AA on the forums, more power to him I suppose. I just wonder why this thread was even needed then.
[/quote]
I wanted to voice my feelings about this war. I couldn't do that until I'd done something about it. I like nothing less than empty words. -
[quote name='Beau Vine' timestamp='1317895074' post='2818301']
Oh my, no!
Legion - props for attacking.
Tetris - they're are a lulzy AA, and lulz they make.
NSO - they are a belligerent AA, and wars they join (+props for voicing their feelings on Tetris actions while standing by MDP pact).
NsO - if for nothing else, props for blitz.
IAA involvment I'd agree was ill-advised (or rather according to one member - made despite good advice), but distasteful?
That said, did you just win 200 tech Sabcat? I have to admit, if you didn't close the shop before I finally got through Legion DoW thread, that'd be 300
And as an IA person, CN is never boring to me
[/quote]
No, I've won no tech. The bet was that NSO would call in allies. I don't believe that anyone allied to NSO has declared (or am I wrong?) -
[quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1317894731' post='2818298']
Stop whining and do something about it if you don't like it. I'm noticing a trend lately after NPO got beat down is that there is so much more whining going on about each and everything someone does.
[/quote]
I'm not whining as you put it, I'm stating my position. As for doing something about I have switched my AA and I@m currently fighting 2 offensive wars. -
[quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1317894167' post='2818290']
"CN IS BORING". Alliance A attacks alliance B. "THIS IS NOT FAIR, WAR SHOULD BE STOPPED".
[/quote]
I have at no point described events as unfair. The coalition currently lined up against Legion is devoid of any class. I find them offensive. -
I find the behaviour of Tetris to be shameful, the NSO goading to be utterly transparent, the NsO support ill advised and don't get me started on IAA, I can't work out what the hell's going on with them.
In the time honoured "do something about it" CN way I've switched AA to The Legion and started fighting. Sometimes you just can't stand by. -
[quote name='TehChron' timestamp='1317836116' post='2817172']
Did you make sure to include the Legion Constant in your calculations?
L = M(Nation Strength) x A(alliance membership) - C(Competence Level of alliances Legion is Fighting)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FML(Infinity)
Come back after double-checking your results.
[/quote]
You should speak to Varianz, he's got a bit more of an idea what's going on than you're demonstrating. As he posted in the NsO declaration thread just now:
[quote]Somewhere there's a post of mine from like 2 weeks ago where I stated there was no way NSO could beat Legion 1 on 1. Adding Tetris doesn't much change that. CN is a numbers game, and 2000 nukes going up against less than a thousand is math even you can do. Legion might be terrible, but it only takes tiny bit of intelligence to be able to click a button. [/quote] -
[quote name='TehChron' timestamp='1317835676' post='2817166']
Who says we need saving?
Given the performance and general WCs of Legion nations we've seen up until now, it looks like Legion are the ones who are going to need to be saved.
[/quote]
Maths says you need saving. -
Bah, no RoK coming to save the Sith yet. I want to win my tech bet
-
[quote name='rodrod' timestamp='1317753068' post='2816284']
I'll take it <.<
[/quote]
Sorry, shop's closed. I've got 200 tech on this already. That's plenty in the crazy unpredictable place. -
[quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1317752822' post='2816282']
And now we're debating the semantics of "aggressor and defender" in the context of a tech bet.
Jesus Cybernations, this is what we've come to.
[/quote]
It's fun though, no? -
If Tetris bring in allies and Legion's allies join in response to that then I'm prepared to concede the loss of the bet all be it on a rather technical point.
-
[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1317751619' post='2816260']
It's a stupid and loaded "bet." For one, if the point is that calling in allies is a sign of weakness, well it's Tetris, your ally, who's called in allies first. Secondly, Legion has been aggressively attacked by Tetris who is joined in mutual aggression by NSO, it is only natural that Legion's defensive treaties be activated, that's how treaties work.
[/quote]
It's all based on goading. There are those that want this to escalate, they're pointing at stats now less than 24 hours into a war to show that Legion need help, that they're failing. It seems to me that it is not in Legion's interests or their allies for this to escalate. The number of declared wars, anarchies etc. mean nothing, just from simple maths it's clear that Legion can fight this war for a very long time with things exactly as they are even if (and some will say it's not an if) Legion make a complete pigs ear of fighting. They have no need for allies, they could go away for a week and barely notice what's going on.
As such I'm prepared to bet 200 tech (100 with WC and 100 with Varianz) that NSO get someone else in before Legion do. I believe my analysis is sound, I'm not 1000 tech confident of it though. -
[quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1317751406' post='2816257']
1000/50=20 slots. That's only a little over a month of sending tech. I have a sizeable warchest, so even after a few rounds against Legion et all I'll have plenty if I lose the bet (I won't).
Take the bet please.
[/quote]
I offered a 100 tech bet which WorldConqueror has taken. If you want to as well you can, I'm not betting 1000tech with you. You either want the bet or you don't. -
[quote name='Varianz' timestamp='1317751021' post='2816249']
I'll bet you 1k tech Legion call in an ally before we do. 2 to 1 odds aren't their flavor- they need 3 to 1 to feel safe.
[/quote]
Don't be a silly boy, you're no more capable of paying a 1k tech bet than I am. Make it the one hundred and if I lose I'll pay, and you will do the same. -
I bet 100 tech that NSO get an ally involved before Legion do.
Anyone want to take the bet? -
I like the war flag lots
-
NPO are a class act, love em or hate em.
-
I'll be ok, I died last year
-
I'm not sure about players who've been around a long time but after a year and a few days here I'm not looking for any game updates to keep me interested and I have no plans to delete my nation or let it die from inactivity.
I'd say that I was lucky though, I got an message in my inbox in the first day or so of joining the game from Legion. I joined, I got game guides, a forum that's very active with threads about the game and not about the game. I got help setting up trades, I got tech deals I got to be as active or as inactive as I like. Say what you like about Legion but they're the reason I'm still in the game. I'm sure many other people could say similar things about their own alliance.
I think if admin could do one thing to improve the retention of new players it would be a link in the sign up email to a page detailing the importance of alliances with links to forums, treaty web and history. -
I have no idea what the political implications of this treaty are but the image is brilliant
-
Congrats to the new gov members.
[quote name='Megamickel' timestamp='1310202482' post='2753200']
Another term as Althing, another term to pretend like I'm important
[/quote]
What is an Althing?
An Announcement from the Imperial Assault Alliance
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
[quote name='Beau Vine' timestamp='1317896106' post='2818315']
Whether takers of his bet will weasel out on this (absolutely valid) semantic argument is another matter. Allies, side of coalition in a war, allies, signatories of an official pact. Poteytoh potatoh in reverse.
[size="1"]edit: grammarz[/size]
edit2: My bad, the latter definition was intended
[/quote]
It has to be an NSO ally, I deliberately made the bet that way.