Jump to content

koona

Members
  • Posts

    431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by koona

  1. [quote name='Il Impero Romano' timestamp='1290932133' post='2525213']
    Problem is, there is no influence monopoly like there was in your hay day. Instead, there are peers.

    Keep operating under the assumption that MK is some NPOesqe boogyman puppeteer though, it really does make life easier when those across the fence are ignorant.
    [/quote]

    You see peers, I see lack of ambition and drive, with you claiming to be so in sync you might as well all merge into 1 alliance, well you couldn't all claim to be alliance "leaders" then.

    As far as "culture" (MK certainly has it's distinct style) goes, you're pretty much all the same. And that is why MK is viewed by the world at large the leader of this merry band because they're unique.

  2. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1290887566' post='2524727']
    When were these days?
    [/quote]

    I have to agree on this one, the end of GW3 was seen by many to be the end of the world, two alliances in particular disbanding too.

    That was 3.5 years ago.

  3. I have read many ideas and while some are good (IMO) and some are bad (also IMO) most of them have already been suggested in the past, but that is not the problem.

    I would like to ask Admin one question with a possibility of 3 answers, they're not meant to upset but I believe the community deserves to know.

    The lack of game development (and I mean big things like when aid, destructive wars, improvs, wonders were added) is due to?

    1. Kevin doesn't want to do more
    2. Kevin doesn't care either way
    3. Kevin doesn't know what to do more with the game.

    If it's 1 or 2, we the community should know, we'll keep playing with what we got until we have it and then we'll all fade away from where we came from, but at least we're clear with the future of this game.

    If it's 3 then there's the possibility of opening it up to contributors, there are players who know how to program, some might even be willing to do this pro-bono. I know the filtering of trustworthy people takes time, but it's something to think about.

    Another idea could be to sell the game to somebody to will develop on the idea that is CN.

  4. [quote name='ShinRa' date='20 May 2010 - 05:44 AM' timestamp='1274352229' post='2304866']
    What I am sore about is that you have not learnt a single thing nor have you showed any sign of improvement towards the treatment of your former enemies.

    Nor have you showed any sign of changing for the better.
    [/quote]

    We send them a lot of tech and money. What else should have we done?

  5. [quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='15 March 2010 - 12:06 PM' timestamp='1268673126' post='2226365']
    If addressing your previous use of a forum is outside the scope of this thread, then I would strongly advise everyone to avoid using any kind of 'service' that has your name attached to it.[/b]
    [/quote]

    But that is what he's trying to tell you, it wasn't his use, it was mine.

  6. The real question here isn't whether or not spying is a valid CB. It's why the reaction towards spying isn't universal.

    You are quite wrong. The reaction is universal, the extent of what they can do about it isn't.

  7. I realized the in the Pacific, what I viewed as "true" or "classical" Francoism had been lost, and I shared those concerns with some of my old friends, my true Comrades.

    Again, how is that possible?

    What's classical francoism? an analytical view that has failed to keep up with reality?

    And thus ceasing to be an analytical view of the surrounding world?

    And thus by definition ceasing to be francoism altogether?

    As Vladimir pointed out:

    There is a Francoist analysis that was and is no more.

    Francoism is the same, it's just that its analysis has changed with the changing material conditions.

×
×
  • Create New...