Namayan
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Namayan
-
-
thank you for this new signature
-
Congratulations to us!!!
-
Huzzah for our pip!
Yeah!
-
Congrats to us!
-
Wow, first DOW of TTE.
can you guys bring this war to me so I can have the fun as well?
:D
-
congrats to our allies!!!
-
Congratulations to our allies at DT!
-
well according to what I see Brehon Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:40 AM
If the time is based on local timezone, technically it is March 27 in some parts of the world
:D
-
If I understand the game correctly, 1 land adds 0.2 population. If with agriculture development program wonder, 1 land adds 0.5 population. So if the game records timmehh to have 100k land means 50k population. If it records more like 150k land, then population added would be 75k.
When comes to invincibility timmehhh ain't invincible because of land. Land loses the same rate as infra. You didn't take to account his current tech which 7th overall and 1st among warring nations. You also did not consider politics here wherein most within his range are either neutrals or allies. Another that was not considered is how timmehh plays the game or his skill at playing it. Land has always been a game mechanic available to everyone. But only timmehh maximized it while most players think that land is a useless game feature.
It is quite unsettling If we are to change the game mechanics simply because a group players are doing better than others. -
With due respect to those who posted, I think the war alliances are more concern about war casualties and stats like those as nature of war alliances are to lose total NS.
-
fighting reputation
That can be provided thru the battle statistics:
Stat by Mompson of Polaris as of Feb 25, 2013
Total NS detroyed by UCoN :
225,982.0193 NS
Total NS lost by UCoN:
188,402.325 NSDamage Ratio : 1.19
Stat undeleted due to new mechanics of non-deletion of battle stats as of March 10, 2013
Total NS detroyed by UCoN :
159,248 NS
Total NS lost by UCoN:
113,062.28 NS
Damage Ratio : 1.40
If you use Missing value analysis and/or interpolate the deleted battle stats and fix the overlapping stats, Damage Ratio should be around 1.25-1.30. If you base this final damage ratio on Mompson's stat back in Feb 25, right around Pacifica, MK, GOONS, NG's damage ratio.
-
I've never said UCoN doesn't deserve props for going into the war. The way they went about leaving is what I take issue with.
We signed the peace with MW's permission. Better ask 2 of your allies on it rather me putting sensitive stuff here. It will clear up why we chose peace.
Peace was very far from our minds until we were informed of the situation.
-
For the sake of MW I won't turn this thread into a dramafest, but there was very little honor in how they left the war.
UCoN will always stay at war as long MW ask us to do so. We had the permission of our allies at MW with regards to this peace since there is already something happening beyond our reach. There is more to this agreement than meets the eye. Please ask our common allies at MW for more info.
-
So, let me get this straight.
Ted went to these peace talks and acted like TORN were destroying us and would put its jackboot on our neck. He threw "joke" counter-offers, meant to be offensive, further torpedoing any negotiations.
And then...
He asked Pacifica for help?
Golden.
Just a simple question for TOP.
Shouldn't GLOF and DT be the ones who TOP should be dealing for peace since it was they who dealt more damage to TOP?
-
Nuking or blockading nations are part of mutual warfare. If you can nuke me I can nuke you back. And the nukes can fly between us merrily.
Sanctions are entirely one-sided in that sense, yet they are also indiscriminate in effect. They dont just damage the nation fired at them, but several other nations as well.
A second senator on the same sphere, AFTER some time, can remove the sanction, but by that time the damage is done, the nation most likely already moved and established new trades.
These are some of the reasons that the use of sanctions as tools of war are a long-standing taboo here. /b/ tried it and got what they deserved. When was the last time you saw them around here eh?
In conclusion, your post was simply ignorant. If you havent the slightest idea what you are talking about, it might not be necessary to post at all.
Taboo is a matter of culture. But whats the point of having those game mechanics if you cannot use it. I am not ignorant, I just do not discriminate game mechanics for the sake of other people saying otherwise. Forcing another people not using a game mechanic is very discriminating and more of Fascist complex by people who want it not used.
Peace mode has been a taboo for some simply because some say so. But it is purely valid tactic. The same goes to other game mechanics.
The senator power is available to all who can value it and organize to place their man at it it. If you cannot value or use it, you should not play this game at all.
Not only that, the gameplay will be more colorful if you place back the color game politics.
If you Tabooist people do not want the Senator game mechanic, better request almighty Admin to remove it and your problem will be solved.
-
Needs less Auctor
I always enjoy reading Auctor, Auinur and Titan discussions at DT channel.
-
i dont think anything is wrong with Sanctions. It will make the game interesting again since color sanction is part of the gameplay..
Saying color sanction is bad is like saying nuking any nation, blockading any nation is bad.
But then again, even though HoT was sanctioned by MK, shouldn't the GOD senator be able to repeal any sanctions done by o ya baby? If so, what is the point of the complaint?
-
Perhaps. I found the war at DT rather Shallow and Pedantic.
I can translate this for everyone.
You keep claiming AI will win but refuse to war at the side of AI since DT are allies of AI. Not only that, DT joined a war wherein your NS range of your nation will not even be even touched that much, meaning no one will declare war on you at all.
I wonder who will accept you as a member in war based alliances since you dodge a war wherein you have the advantage, almost immunity at your NS range.
-
Death Before Dishonor came to us and asked us if we would peace out with them not the other way around, apparently we're cool and they want to attack other people more. Lying is dishonorable, you shouldn't do it ;)
I can confirm this. UCoN or MW never initiated nor approached DB4D for peace. DB4D was the one who approached us for peace.
Then you should have taken the peace you asked us for.
o/ Pacifica.
I wonder how many times Equilibrium has been lied to by their fellow coalition members.
-
Ok, so the fact that we are doing roughly equal damage means we've hurt you way more than you've hurt us, as our damage was on soft infra and your damage was on ultra hard tech that lifts.
Losses are very much different by tiers for this week. If you based it at around 100k-80k ranges, Equilibrium had around 247% increased losses at that NS range( this already includes GDA and Apparatus at the count) while Competence decreased its losses by 60%(EvU,Hooligans,HB not yet included at the count).
With regards, to 80k-60k NS range there is a tie. This I will agree with you.
If the trend of Eq keeps increasing percentage in losses at the 100k-80k continues, the kill zone for Equilibrium seems to be going down tier by tier which was around 100k-80k last week, 80k-60k this week.
-
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqaCrij7SLiidGxUVllNUDBWZndPNHZuTFE3MDdEMkE&usp=sharing
Those are very revealing stats. Isnt Equilibrium suppose to dominate 100k-80k NS? What is with the 0% defensive slots?
From those stats, the focus of Equilibrium on this front is concentrated mostly at the 40-60k NS
By correlating this stat from shinra:(http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/115443-upper-tier-tracking-thread/page-4), one can assume that the numerical superiority is suppose to dominate C&G and co. But the stats given by USmurf seems to otherwise contradict it,
SF/XX/Aftermath and co.120k+ - 12 (0) --> 12 (0)100k - 20 (1) --> 20 (3)80k - 97 (51) --> 84 (42)CnG and Co.120k+ - 37 (23) --> 44 (30)100k+ - 19 (11) --> 19 (10)80k - 56 (14) --> 61 (17) -
As I've repeatedly said in that thread, even if Equilibrium suffers losses at an equal rate to "Competence", the mere fact that they have more nations in that 80-60k tier means that those losses mean less to them overall. If you read the OP's statements, he clearly states that Equilibrium's hold over the middle tiers means that Competence nations in the top tier need to continually purchase above that range or get swarmed to death. This is the simple fact of it. You can try and skew the facts however you want, but anybody analysing this in a rational manner on either side knows this.
Not really, you did not understand those statistics very well. On the 100k-80km there was a 247% percentage increase in losses for Equilibrium for that and a 60% percentage decrease for Competence. Like I said on that blog, If that patterned continued Equilibrium will be in trouble especially if the pattern would to continue increase in percentage loss for Equilibrium and decrease for Competence, no amount of superiority numbers would hold. The losses were very different a week ago as stated by the blog poster wherein Equilibrium lost less both in numbers and percentage wise compared to Competence.
So, you might have not yet updated your numbers yet as you seem very biased even though the statistics says otherwise.
-
Yes equilibrium has the quantity. However, quantity is only relevant if all of those numbers are as efficient and as good as the rest. DR,DT and Pacifica are in a totally different way of thinking and game play versus the rest co-members in Equilibrium.
Also, the stats made by an NSO member, http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/blog/811/entry-3687-stats-itb-5/, shows a completely different picture at the mid tiers wherein the 80k-60k as a statistical tie in losses within the week of Feb 12-20.
There is also a difference of what is happening per front as the C&G front hasn't fought the mid-tiers which probably define as between 40k-80k.
If someone would bring out the statistics on losses on 60-40k, I am sure I will agree with you if what you say is supported by it. However, since the statistics are not yet supporting what you claim, I must disagree on what you say.
-
good luck to my friends at EvU
Dope Doom Knights
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
YosoAmazing!