Jump to content

Kharon the Ferryman

Members
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kharon the Ferryman

  1. EDIT: the situation is nearly setteled, nevermind my opinions of the matter. :-) Thanks for you attention, KtF
  2. [quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1295934529' post='2598961'] Doesn't change the fact that Dajobo tried to spy on VE. If he spied on MHA instead, then this war would be between MHA and NpO. [/quote] If it would've been any other alliance than VE then I doubt this would've grown into a war. Which real leader would leak info about their OWN alliance? Impero must have been reaaally desperate.
  3. [quote name='Einer' timestamp='1289611466' post='2511505'] I think Skaro and Catharsis both hurt their cause by widening the conflict, though. If you had only hit known raiders (and lord knows there isn't a shortage of them), I think a lot of people would have sat on the sidelines and . However, [b]hitting TPC nations indiscriminately made it into an issue for the entire alliance[/b]. [/quote] [quote name='Roi Loup' timestamp='1289792124' post='2513308'] if [b]they didnt attack why should they be punished[/b]? its like condemning a witness of a murder to death just for seeing it.. [/quote] Now you two figure things out by yourself, there has been enough said in this topic. Oh and I'll also prevent your next question and answer it right away: Why this needed to be an issue for a large alliance is because this subject needed some wide attention. This clearly has been achieved. (I told you in my previous post, this was planned before the round started.) [quote name='White Chocolate' timestamp='1289665287' post='2511872'] text [/quote] Thank you for being (almost) the only person who understands the background of this. [quote name='King James XVIII' timestamp='1289859520' post='2513799'] text [/quote] & thank you also for taking the responsibility.
  4. [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1289601355' post='2511397'] But why should Catharsis have to play by your rules? Just because you think they shouldnt attack nations that are not involved doesnt mean they dont think differently. They may be wanting to send a signal, and whilst they will rightly be crushed for creating an AA war out of this, you will likely not bother them next round. Maybe TPC will look more closely at their war screens in the coming rounds because of this mess? [/quote] !THIS! ...pretty much sums up the entire conflict which brought up this subject. The fact that you're big doesn't necessarily make everyone play by your rules. As an extra comment on the "related nations" idea - members of the Cult of Skaro had agreed to make an all out attack before the round started. Targets were picked few days before the attack. This was never about who was actively raiding who. This was about alliance politics and the wish to be seen. TPC's members had tradically slowed our growth and lowered our will to play in several previous rounds and this could not continue. The fact that TPC had some active conflicts with several other small alliances and our decision to team up with the small ones came by coincidence.
  5. Marble + Wheat for 3BR. [url="http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=420642"]Here.[/url] [s]By the way, would you consider adding Fish?[/s] Nevermind, Gems seem fine, too. :-) KtF
  6. Hi! I'm Marble+Wheat also. Blue sphere and a stabile player. [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=420642]Kharon the Ferryman of 9th Battalion[/url] Hope you accept, KtF
  7. bump And by the way, I've already created a thread in the Avalanche forums about this, Hono. KtF
  8. If that open slot could be Silver then I'm up for it. (Silver + Wheat) http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=386722
×
×
  • Create New...