Cellardoor
-
Posts
443 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Cellardoor
-
-
[quote name='King Ernie' timestamp='1316579146' post='2805108']
well, we knew you were on to us when we tried keeping you out of war, the casualty race was our 2nd option.
Have fun getting CM'd!
srsly tho.
good luck to both sides.
[/quote]
Oh don't worry, the nation who was initially supposed to attack me that we anarchied before update just attacked me-- with about 650 more infra than I have. I'm sure eventually he'll come after my troops.
edit: I think he had to sell land to declare on me actually, lol.. -
I think LW's point is he could've declared on bigger guys. Not sure though. I don't have a lot of room to talk as I declared down on one guy to kick him out of the top 5%, the other two were your best guys left though.
And I believe I've finally found the conspiracy in this DoW. Stelios dirty plan. It's to keep me out of the casualties race. I've been hit with one ground attack in two days. -
[quote name='SoADarthCyfe6' timestamp='1316575058' post='2805055']
We're throwing around targets as we speak. Unfortunately I don't expect you to believe that.
Except the fact that bcortell started it?
[/quote]
I'm not talking about only a round. More about Synergy as a whole in its existence.
And I'm sure the targets you're throwing around are some real juggernauts. And you'll justify it by pointing to your own lack of nukes and the fact that they have four more nations. I'm on pins and needles waiting for your normal bold step. -
So if I've been reading the stats pages right, TPC had precisely one nation anarchied in this war.
Interesting. -
[quote name='ADude' timestamp='1316552905' post='2804657']
I want to see if someone else will go 30 days like last round..I need a new "no less then sig".
Also, get in your hole and die you vile thing
[/quote]
Synergy and their glass house is always good for some entertainment.
I'd like to again say I'm impressed with RE's improvement. I've got a highly active opponent, a very cordial opponent, and a Stelios.
Two out of three ain't bad. -
[quote name='Overlord Wes' timestamp='1316470168' post='2803987']
I think he's factoring reputations into the stats
[/quote]
Oh we're doing that again? lol -
[quote name='ADude' timestamp='1316456989' post='2803836']
We couldn't let the ebil PS go without war while they were on the brink of getting WRC's
[/quote]
Oh come on...we're harmless. -
[quote name='SoADarthCyfe6' timestamp='1316451868' post='2803808']
Oh the horror! Oh the travesty! Oh the up declare! Oh RE!
[/quote]
Good war /=/ updeclare
-
[quote name='Stelios' timestamp='1316412743' post='2803565']
We tried to make it fair Schad.
[/quote]
You'll hear no complaining from our side hopefully. As far as offensive wars against PS go this is about the most fair one we've seen in some time. You guys also had a better blitz than I expected. You've been improving.
Of course you missed me entirely. We'll fix that soon enough though.
Btw, we're never on RD's side. Should be fun! -
Solid looking war RE.
Good luck. -
[quote name='King Ernie' timestamp='1316203310' post='2801721']
seems our plans of keeping PS out of war are working.
[/quote]
That would be a very, very bad goal for the rest of TE sooner or later -
[quote name='Victor Von Doom' timestamp='1316143514' post='2801285']
Has to be an up or down declare in there somewhere.
I just can't see it.
Must be subliminal.
Have a good one fellas.
[/quote]
Hahahaha. I was totally thinking this when I opened it. -
Nice looking war.
-
[quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1316132710' post='2801155']
Cute
[/quote]
If you read the rest of the post, your sarcasm isn't warranted. -
Stevie I assure you, PS does want to destroy your nation.
Along with the rest of TE. No plotting here. Before all the fireworks started I kind of wanted to organize something where we forced Anon and OP on the same side. Like LE, PS, Syn against you two, and THP or something odd like that.
Oh well. Best laid plans and all that. -
[quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1315993269' post='2800290']
Ok. Yes I remember. I believe DR held a duel membership treaty with G-6 that round to enable us to jump into the G-6 AA to flag run. My nation was the main nation that jumped that had an impact. What did you do to help? Jks.
Anyways. This started a while ago between OP and DR and was supposed to have ended without me or confusion in upper gov, but has continued with both LE and now 0P and LEstriking early to do significant damage. Blaming it on TPC is ironic. There were good one on one opportunities a plenty.
[/quote]
lol, and people wonder why the things Confusion is associated with are distrusted. Duel (dual?) memebership AAs, that as far as I can remember weren't public, massive down declares... this is also the round we had GR hit us, then 40 minutes later someone else hit us. And we can go back to sicking Catharsis on us, failing, and sending 6 alliances our way. The funny thing with all the talk of perpetuating cycles is we've never declared on G-6/Anon. Just DR in one round that Stevie called a down declare after his entire alliance turtled. -
The real travesty is that PS lost 3 solid targets in this war.
Where's the crying for that? -
We're going to quantifying activity into how fair wars are?
I don't think I like the idea of someone making it our problem because we're active. -
Whoa, totally missed the entire second page before my post.
Agreed with Schad. If LE/OP hit us, cest la vie. We enjoy our wars with them.
edit: yeah I knew what you meant confusion. Just saw strictly those four alliances as probably a bit too much of an updeclare. Especially this early on. -
I wouldn't say it's a huge down declare, but it's not the updeclare I'm used to seeing. PS/Anon actually would've been an interesting target for them, but probably a bit too much of an updeclare. Maybe bringing along Synergy and also hitting THP? /shrug
Wars are getting harder to make "even" these days. -
[quote name='Swatch0' timestamp='1315829894' post='2799215']
Great, one of the reasons I play TE is because its not like SE, alliance helping each other and hiding behind each other. We are one step closer to making TE no different then SE. Wonderful
Nywayz o/ to a good war
[/quote]
Trying to follow your reasoning here. Is LE hiding behind OP, or is OP hiding behind LE? Joint declarations happen frequently in TE and have for many rounds (though usually LE/OP have been on the receiving end)
in fact, your alliance has done the same thing here:
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=102607
here we go. You mean SE like protectorates? Like these ones?
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=103145
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=102364 -
Holy frightening blitzes batman. 35 wars in two minutes (11:52:05-11:54:05
-
We're going to curbstomp Syn together first, then hit one another.
-
Talked Clash back into it I see!
Welcome back friends.
A TPC DoW
in TE OWF Archive
Posted
Everyone has their own opinions, but IMO, ANS and nukes reign supreme as far as stats go. It generally lays out like that as far as I can tell. Didn't realize how egregious the ANS difference was. To TPC's credit it looks like they didn't launch many nukes if any. To their discredit, a "top" alliance by most's standards engaging in a non-nuclear war isn't looked upon well.