Jump to content

Cellardoor

Members
  • Posts

    443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cellardoor

  1. So, PS' war declaration in it's entirety isn't a fair fight?

    I guess if your version of fair fighting doesn't include spying nukes either.

    We hit the top nations, period. At least we're not hitting a single alliance with all our force that just came out of a war like has been done by, well, a lot of people. And it's STILL not a down declare.

  2. [quote name='NeoGandalf' timestamp='1321854473' post='2847870']
    I noticed that I will be out of regular anarchy by update :D I bought an MP with what little I had and I'm going to hit three PS guys. This is just for you :awesome:
    [/quote]

    Would you like my nation link or can you find it on your own?

  3. [quote name='Wired' timestamp='1321854183' post='2847863']
    So let me see if I get the ethics involed here...

    You shouldn't build and save WCs becauase that [b]has to [/b]mean you are focusing [b]soley[/b] on a flag run and focusing on the flag is wrong?

    But you can look at the flag run and focus soley on it as justification to hold people to 27 days of war and then an AA that sat on the bench for 30 days can jump anyone to clear out [b]perceived[/b] flag runners?

    Funny how an OP nation that was afk for 36 hours somehow woke up to hit me at exactly the same time a PS declared and hit me. I guess fighting back and not turtling for my 14 days of war didn't make it clear enough I am not a flag runner. Maybe someone was worried I could hit a flag runner?

    Wake up folks. It started with OP dragging Syn into hitting TPC in a planned long war and now we see the next part of the master plan. :ph34r:
    [/quote]

    Whoa, this puts me on Confusion's level of puppeteering, right?

  4. [quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1321854109' post='2847862']
    Quick question gais, why have you guys given up on flag chasing for OMFG? :blush:
    [/quote]

    The four of us in charge...we're sick of flag running. We're more from the destruction side of the two-face PS has.

    If OMFG wants the flag, maybe we can get all of PF in for a round. That'd be roughly half of TE. Even a monkey couldn't screw that one up.

  5. [quote name='arcticllama' timestamp='1321853718' post='2847850']
    What do you have against RD?

    and your declarations are downdeclares on 9 of 10 RD declarations... don't try to sugarcoat it..

    also, PS has hit RD in 8 of the last 9 rounds at the end.. did we do something to you somewhen?
    if so let me know so we can exaserbate it :smug:
    [/quote]

    http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1000323

    This guy was an up declare for me before we relieved him of 300 infra. My dance partner Dock was close if not below him in terms of it too.

    Btw, holy balls WRCs are devastating.

  6. [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1321853548' post='2847847']
    Ahhhhhhhhhh !@#$.
    [/quote]

    Sorry clash. Kudos on the quick counter from your alliance.

    Feel free to send a few my way.

    That goes for everyone. If you've got a bored nation who doesn't mind WRC nukes. Look me up.

  7. [quote name='NeoGandalf' timestamp='1321852592' post='2847813']
    You're the one making an individual case here. My opponent (J Bibbs) has double my infra, more planes, 20 nukes, a WRC, and he can collect taxes. To top it off, he sold off his land so I can't blockade him in an effort to save his tax collections while I don't even have a chance to collect.
    [/quote]

    you also have an alliance mate to coordinate with, a very active clash with a bunch of nukes, and the guy who came to clash's defense to coordinate with. We don't have any slots left to put someone on his counter, so he's now fighting four nations. You really think you guys can't manage some damage?

  8. something else to keep in mind, the number of our opponents is fluid once we get counters. Whoever declares on us you need to account for their nukes, their sdis, their WCs, etc. If you don't like the situation, fine. But is anyone ready to call it a down declare?

  9. [quote name='NeoGandalf' timestamp='1321852254' post='2847802']
    Your three opponents are at 17k, 16k, and 10k. You are at 17k. Not an updeclare.

    It's pretty obvious PS just wanted to avoid war with LE so they hit "everybody."
    [/quote]

    As I said, my vote included LE. The 10k guy was my bad. I should mention that guy has a huge WC and a WRC. And that I just bought like 200 tech and stole tech on ground battles. The other two were pretty obvious updeclares prior to.

  10. [quote name='Stelios' timestamp='1321852008' post='2847793']
    I could have gave you links if you asked...
    [/quote]

    That's actually my fault. We had a vote amongst our council. The options were
    top 60
    top 60 minus le
    top 60 runners
    op/le

    op's war running so long ruined number 4, and I voted numer 1 instead of number 3. If I'd voted number 3 we might have a top 60 runners dec instead, but then it'd look like a down declare in another way, so really the whining is the same in terms of volume I'm sure.

    edit: Neo, the NS numbers are backwards or you're not reading them right. we have half the NS of our targets, not double.

  11. Is what we did a down declare?

    I declared up on my three targets, two are flush with money, one is broke. Being upset with who we hit is each individual's business. Like BC said. We basically were going to end the flag aspirations of whomever we hit, so we chose to leave the flag in the hands of the people who don't want it and to the people who are hiding. End of story.
    edit: in the interest of my sanity. This will likely be my last owf post in this soon to be 10 page thread. Feel free to pm me.

  12. [quote name='dogbite' timestamp='1321767032' post='2847338']
    Not sure i would call op a top aa when they drag a war out and help to kill the game for the noobs. Is wars like this that kill te. Get past you ego,s and your pride and end this war. However i have 3 open slots if you got any real fight left.
    [/quote]

    If dragging out wars and killing the game is the issue here that's a mighty fragile glass house you find yourself in.

  13. [quote name='Chaos Reigns' timestamp='1321423160' post='2845413']
    This isn't a serious question. Stop trolling.
    [/quote]

    It's absolutely a serious question. I genuinely don't know what you guys intend to do with that threat. Overwhelm their lower tier's lower tier?

  14. [quote name='Chaos Reigns' timestamp='1321369873' post='2845062']
    Hidden Leader has been a member of AP Coalition since the beginning. Declare peace with him.
    [/quote]

    ...or what? lol. You guys have like one nation in range of his attackers.

    And PS-RE already danced this round. We've got other plans now.

  15. [quote name='paul711' timestamp='1320876485' post='2842356']
    I dont blame them for anything except for trying to act as though their actions are good. I would call OP, LE, and PS friends but not an alliance. :)
    [/quote]

    Well, PS wasn't around last round, the round before I believe was the round you decided we shouldn't actually have any free time, and between everyone's grudge matches prior to that and everyone's view of "sides", it's been tough to fight them without letting the other side "win". I wanted to hit LE this round. And two rounds ago, and so on and so fourth :(.

    Confusion, can you join LE so I can convince other people we should hit them?

  16. [quote name='King James XVIII' timestamp='1319429047' post='2831379']
    Good question. I think the better question is whether someone is going to wait as long to take us on as it took for LE.
    [b](I am [u]NOT[/u] looking to relitigate or open up a can of worms with that statement!!!)[/b]
    [/quote]

    I see the disclaimer below that, but isn't this sort of a glass house?

×
×
  • Create New...