Jump to content

Reyas

Members
  • Posts

    236
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Reyas

  1. [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1350790650' post='3043556']
    You would think you'd realize your "policy" is broken by now. You know it's bad when I'm agreeing with magicninja, but damn, you guys went and did it.
    [/quote]

    Nothing like a GOONS raiding fiasco to bring people together.

  2. [quote name='Sabcat' timestamp='1348019434' post='3031636']
    You are quite wrong and we have no plans to cancel any other treaties.
    [/quote]

    So MCXA, NATO, UCR, The Resistance, NsO, Tetris and SWF were all willing to go to war for you only on the condition that INT joined? I'm genuinely curious to find out if any of them actually offered support and why you didn't accept it? they're all well tied to other alliances/blocs.

  3. [quote name='Dochartaigh' timestamp='1348008677' post='3031580']
    I stand by my allies regardless. I have burned my nation time and again, not just for the alliance I was in but for my allies. Ask TIO about how pissed I was we did not go in for MCXA. Yes, what LSF did was quite stupid but LSF were your allies and you let them burn. You let an alliance basically raze your ally to the ground without ever really trying to help them out.


    [/quote]

    So basically, you'd support MCXA in a pre-empt of another alliance when they ignored their own tie to LSF? Stunning.

  4. [quote name='lordoftheland' timestamp='1345250657' post='3022940']
    You mean like the blood ice accords? You should look things up before you speak, at least you would be more accurate. Lets get this party started guys, Be timely at least, if not fair in the ns compare.

    To complain about the tactics that have been used time and again is not to valid as well, I mean IRON and many others had used and it was very effective. Maybe if your wars were not so one sided you would have an upper tier enemy to attack and have a real battle on your hands.

    To be honest, all the ODN opponents I fought were honorable and honest, it was conducted with respect and they had their facts straight.
    [/quote]

    What? I'm talking about Sparta. None of you had ties to Sparta, but declared on us anyways. If you had followed treaties in you'd probably be defending GOD, or not even in the war, but you chose to get together with your treaty partners and attack us, which is fine, that's how wars go but you have to be willing to pay the price if it fails, which it did. I'm not complaining about what you did. I understand it but I'm just pointing out facts.

    Edit: Also, yes everyone I fought was fun to chat with and very respectable. I think there's new found respect between BFF, ODN, BN and most of your coalition.

  5. [quote name='keeology' timestamp='1345156805' post='3022541']
    my only complaint is yall about as slow as a 7 year itch.
    [/quote]

    Well then next time don't enter a war when you have no actual treaty obligation to do so; or if you do, actually fight instead of watching your coalition partners burn. Then none of this would happen.

  6. [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1344095355' post='3018476']
    I wouldn't go bragging about the terms here to anyone. Mostly your side leaves with empty pockets and lameass gladiator sport because someone was butthurt that their upper tier didn't get enough war.

    Sure, alliances should fight like they actually want to fight, I get that. But I wasn't a fan of the concept of staged competitions to end a war the first time and I'm not going to change my mind now.

    This could have been an honorable end to fighting and for some of you it is. For the rest...meh.
    [/quote]


    5 alliances pre-empted us and lost. 4 of them got off with a surrender/no re-entry/no aid clause and one gets to duel us for a cycle since they mostly remained in peacemode. You're seriously going to complain about the terms here? Wow, I can't wait to see how merciful your alliance is once you start winning wars; white peace for all?

  7. [quote name='OPArsenal' timestamp='1343757177' post='3017305']
    Attacking during peace talks? Sure, why not? I'm not surprised to see GATO picking a wounded alliance to take to school.

    Gotta protect all those sweet, sweet pixels and still look like a badass, right?
    [/quote]

    They're just applying more pressure to move stalled peace talks along. It would be nice if they could hit the alliance doing the stalling, but alas, they've been in peacemode since declaring on us.

  8. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1343236896' post='3015157']


    I think that after months of chest-thumping it is absolutely peachy that GATO had to actually threaten escalation to get an alliance so widely regarded as awful as MHA to agree to explicitly admit defeat. But what else was GATO supposed to do, really? C&G is busy, (still no help from Duckroll, ODN?) and you're absolutely starved for a victory after, what, 4 years? Remember, my gaunt GATOan friends, that you shall rupture your stomachs if you eat too much after so long a famine.

    You may have won this little war, but you certainly didn't win any acclaim. More green for NPO's wiki, I say.
    [/quote]

    We hold no treaties with Duckroll, why would we (or you) expect them to help us? Your preoccupation with us is unsettling.

×
×
  • Create New...