Jump to content

dy Cazaril

Members
  • Posts

    1,054
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dy Cazaril

  1. I have composed a poem for Viluin, which I feel is very expressive of the situation. The following is an original composition:

    [i]A nuke-rogue called Viluin (a villain),
    Was fond o' the bombin' and killin'.
    Then he got in a fray,
    With the ol' GPA.
    Now he ain't findin' nukes quite so thrillin'...[/i]

  2. [quote name='Don Chele' timestamp='1330912350' post='2933551']
    I condemn this election as just another attempt by prob to avoid the hall of fame by maintaining a constant governmental position. On the other hand, I applaud the GPA for finally convincing Caz to take the driver's seat. All good people on that list.
    [/quote]

    Actually, this is the second time they've convinced me to do it. :wacko: But thanks!

  3. [quote name='Raptor1752' timestamp='1327910560' post='2910484']
    Hi, I'm a bit new to these forums (or, more rather, that I don't visit this place often), and I would just like to know if my semi-fictional Majapahit flag is a good enough flag:

    It is based upon the supposed Majapahit flag and the current Indonesian Naval Jack and the Surya Majapahit (The symbol of Majapahit). Yes, I know that the black does not distinguish well with the red, but what of the other things about the flag?
    [/quote]

    It's certainly a damned sight better than most of the crap that people use as flags around here. :P

  4. [quote name='nik718' timestamp='1303035722' post='2691893']
    Thanks for the heads up, Admin!

    If I can suggest, I would say making wars more "profitable" would most definitely spice things up and make players actually use ALL of the possible military in order to maximize "the victory" rather just slinging nukes for direct damage. Currently, every kind of war in TE is a pure and huge economical loss, no matter if you win it 100%. Nations who are in peace the fragment of the round just overgrow anybody in couple of days. GA loots cap needs to be set much higher. We should coordinate all military assets and fight wars to push through a sucessfull GA, not to pile up max troops and hope enemy will make a failing GA which will earn 10-15 times more money then one succesful of ours. :blink: IMHO, ofcourse.

    More of my thoughts about TE, here:
    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=92255&st=80&p=2691059&#entry2691059


    Cheers for the succesful start of the Round 17! :)
    [/quote]

    I think this is a great suggestion, and an easily-implemented one. Since we spend most of the round warring, we ought to get some sort of reward for it.

  5. [quote name='SoADarthCyfe6' timestamp='1301118233' post='2676900']
    This part may be generally true once G-6 is finished with you guys.. :ph34r:
    [/quote]

    Because spending the majority of the round in war makes us a "weak alliance". :rolleyes:

×
×
  • Create New...