Jump to content

Clash

Members
  • Posts

    2,090
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Clash

  1. warriorsc.png

     

    Destroy tech... wtf? And you're leader of your alliance. This is just sad... not like you can accidentally do it twice.

     

    ...and just because I still can't sleep, let's beat the snot out of this.

     

    Let's look at the current spy reports.

    hellasspy2_zps46ceeda0.jpg

     

    First of all: Hypocrite much? Alexandria ran at least one earlier.

     

    Second: If we include the incite government ops that Eljierro of Alexandria and that other guy ran earlier, just like last war, our opponents run these kinds of ops more than we do. The stupid spy reports say so RIGHT NOWWWWW, just go count the ones where people got caught. For the last two wars at least. Just because our members don't post here much - after all, it sucks here - doesn't change that fact. Historically, it's ALWAYS been this way. Some alliances, like Citadel (and others), run them as an alliance policy and we don't.The bigger difference is we don't cry like babies about it; and that most of us don't post here anymore just underlines this.

     

    Now, note the difference for the record:

    Pointing out hypocritical sniveling whining - not crying.

    Being a hypocritical sniveling whiner - IS crying.

     

    Anyways, whether any Warriors bother to post here again or not?

    On the actual pixel battlefields, most people seem to be having fun.

     

    That matters most.

  2. Most Attacking Casualties


    1) 177,293 Soldiers Lost - Andy Capp of The Ship - Yellow Team

    2) 174,636 Soldiers Lost - Admiral Piette of Overlord Town - Orange Team

    3) 168,281 Soldiers Lost - Charles F Trot of Unmitigated Disaster - Black Team

    4) 154,691 Soldiers Lost - Shaun Mason of Hail to the King - Black Team

    5) 152,200 Soldiers Lost - Taeyeon of Vuhdo - Blue Team

     

    Most Defending Casualties


    1) 235,816 Soldiers Lost - Clash of Discord - Red Team

    2) 202,751 Soldiers Lost - Andy Capp of The Ship - Yellow Team

    3) 199,719 Soldiers Lost - GanGaKilla of clockwork - Yellow Team

    4) 191,392 Soldiers Lost - Therm of Impulsive - Black Team

    5) 184,221 Soldiers Lost - Dubiety of Island of Doubt - Black Team

     

    Total Soldier Casualties


    1) 380,044 Total Soldiers Lost - Andy Capp of The Ship - Yellow Team

    2) 367,109 Total Soldiers Lost - Clash of Discord - Red Team

    3) 343,323 Total Soldiers Lost - Therm of Impulsive - Black Team

    4) 337,502 Total Soldiers Lost - Charles F Trot of Unmitigated Disaster - Black Team

    5) 332,482 Total Soldiers Lost - Admiral Piette of Overlord Town - Orange Team

     

    W00T! First place by tomorrow :)

     

    In addition to the 4th offensive war slot wonder, I'd also like a second daily offensive deploy wonder.

    THAT would completely rule school. Thanks Admin!

  3. As it is, Warriors did perform those spy  operations to decrease the tax collections after the war on our members, who didn't do it to Warriors...talk about cheap shots..not that I'm surprised

     

    SERIOUSLY?!

    Since I'm here already I'll post on this stupidness too.

     

    The spy attacks for our last war against Citadel are still there in the spy records. While there were a couple sporadic gov/irs attacks by Warriors first, Citadel ran a full alliance-wide gov. spying spree during the war. In total gov/irs attacks, go back and count them, Citadel ran FAR more than we did. It's not even close. They ran them as an ALLIANCE too (class exceptions like Jesuskitty aside of course), while only a few of our nations ran them. The records are RIGHT HERE. Go look and stfu, you bunch of whining sniveling little punks.

  4. Warriors will take a bit of damage and hopefully lose everything but it obviously shouldn't count as a real war for them. 

     

    Geez stooge, go easy on Hellas, this is probably the hardest war they've ever declared, and it's still probably a down declare based on average ns and nukes. I'm kind of proud of them! Sure, they are incredibly lucky that Goodfellas treated them the opposite of how they treated TPC last round, but still. Some alliances have class that way, some don't. Cracked me right up when they cried about Goodfellas, all things considered.

     

    You go on and on about how you won the two wars against us. So why are you crying so incredibly hard about them and so very all the time? Imagine if you actually thought you LOST a war. The tears would drown every nation in TE. We actually haven't cried about a single thing, so hold your hypocrisy in check. War is FUN! Sorry we dented your precious infra, and dude, go learn how to war. I've fought you and you suck at it. You were a drag on every other nation I was fighting because you didn't hold up your end. Regardless of how well the rest of your alliance does, YOU are a loser :awesome:

     

    Reality is that when we declare a war, the other guys almost always have bigger average nations than we do. It was that way when we warred against you, too.Neither you (or Hellas, for that matter) can EVER say the same thing. When other alliances declare war against us, they STILL almost always have bigger average nations than we do and usually many more nukes - like this one. You only fight wars against those with smaller average nations and with fewer nukes. You actually came out of your first war with MORE avs ns then you started with. That's embarrassing. So go back under your bridge, son. In your van. Down by the river.

     

    ...anyways, props out to CaveJohnson, who is turning out to be a pretty darn good fella.

    Cheers for myriam too, who makes me glow :)

     

    Alrighty, back to real life, y'all have fun.

    I still hate this place and all the whining whiny whiners who post here.

  5. Look, here's a pic of Swazz in action:

     

    baby_zpsc372ec59.jpeg

     

    That MUST be his war face.

     

    To: Clash      From: Swazz  

    Date: 4/29/2013 12:44:18 AM

    Subject: Your decisions


    Message: Why don't you just leave us alone?

    I mean, I'm getting beat down. That's only because I had like 3 of you oversized aholes down declare on me. As a whole though, your alliance isn't getting the job done and losing AGAIN.

    How many wars do you have to fight to know that it's just not a good idea to fight us? If your cheap war last time didn't make Kong mad this one certainly will.

    I think Citadel will show you what a real blitz looks like and maybe TPC will join too just to make sure you never come back out of your coffin. By going to war with us AGAIN you made a death wish on behalf of warriors. It's just not good business.

     

    Hey, I got your prewar top nation by myself, your prewar second biggest nation with a WAPA nation, Gold Island who is fighting only me, and then Swazz, who's tears clog up my war slot more than his actual attacks. I could have sworn WAR IS WHY WE WERE HERE. Well, the Warriors and WAPA anyways. Hell, I wish you'd sent two more nations at me, I could use the casualties and the more the merrier.

     

    We have NEVER cared about who wins the war. All alliances we're friends with are those we've warred against, including WAPA who we fought in our very first round ever. We have long practiced our Friends Through War philosophy, and practiced it well. For us there has NEVER been anything except white peace at the end of a war, and our nations are always encouraged to thank those they have warred against. It was the same last war, it will be the same this war, it will be the same next war and every war. This is just a fucking game.

     

    For the record, Jesuskitty is awesome as always, Dagoth of Titan is fighting his best although WARCHEST next time mi amigo, and a special shout out to Donada of Gold Island who is turning out to be a pretty good guy. Then.. ..there's Swazz, who whines like the south of France. I expected better from Ferrie too. Sorry we scratched your infra, dude.

     

    Look, if some of you guys are gonna cry this hard, just message Cowboy and we can peace you all out early. That's ok, we've done it in the past and probably will again in the future. TE isn't for everyone, after all. It's a place where you can hide but you can't run. Sometimes your infra gets scratched.

     

    Otherwise, stfu and fight. Got it?

     

    ---

     

    BTW could someone from TPC please clarify about Swazz being your viceroy? I for one had no idea he could order y'all around whenever he wants too. I mean we all know y'all aren't ever gonna fight each other, but if it's like this, please just go ahead and merge. Kthanksbyebye.

     

    I hate this stupid forum, as do most Warriors. More tears here then posts.

  6. Stats as of 11:42

     

    Warriors & WAPA: 173 nukes, 84.4K infra. 5 nations with 3K+ infra, 7 with 2.5-3K, 3 with 2-2.5K. 

    Citadel&co: 111 nukes, 96.9K infra. 3 nations with 3K+ infra, 5 with 2.5-3K, 12 with 2-2.5K. 

    The nukes are the biggest thing, but well over half of those are in the 5 big WAPA nations.

    They can't drop them all, they don't have enough war slots for that.

     

    ...and I'd like to take this moment to beg Admin once again for the 4th offensive war slot wonder.

    PWEASE!?!

  7. Looks like one of your nations went a little early there, chief. Gave the game away he did! Good luck to everyone involved (except the well prepared and heavily armed nuclear nations :P ) Kill, Kill, Kill. Murder, Murder, Murder.

    Yep a couple guys were premature lol

    The ladies hate that.

  8. WarriorsWarFlag_zps5557025f.jpg

     

     

    AND

     

    WAPA_zps8c531bfc.png

    (The only flag I could find for WAPA :awesome: )

     

    -----------------------

     

    Well it turns out that upon close inspection - the Citadel has rats!

     

    ratcastle_zps9f990432.jpeg

     

    Thus, the Warriors and WAPA declare war upon Citadel, Rat Basterds and just for grins, giggles and old times, Rodentia Dominatus. I miss the Llama, Cowboy misses his ol' buddy Kong. So! Lets all have fun!

     

    o7 Citadel

    o7 Rat Basterds

    o7 Rodentia Dominatus

    o7 WAPA

    o7 WARRIORS!

  9. They were fine with hitting us with nukes last round when we had none. Must be a rule change.

     

    That was one of the bigger down-declares in recent TE history. The hilarious part was how proud they were of themselves and how full of themselves they were. I'd be embarrassed to have picked a war like that, NEVER EVER EVER have the Warriors done anything like such a thing. Yet, they were propped up, pimp-hand waggin' and preachin' the righteous. More? They repeatedly said their prima-donna punk posing was because of what TPC did the round before - yet it even appears Hellas are pissy because this war might have just a hint of last-round repercussions. Irony, you wonderful wench.

     

    It's amazing that they can snivel about this one in any way, but y'know, it's Hellas.

    Sniveling is always what they do best.

     

    What would JV do, JB? He'd drop the HAMMER and jellyleg 'em.

    Please kill something and name it after me :)

     

    PS fake edit: The reallyyy ironic thing? If TPC didn't war soon, they'd have risked doing, once again, what happened in the round that Hellas used as a reason for their humongous down-declare last round - TPC getting too big and finding it harder to find decent wars. Instead, TPC chooses to war a bit more often this round than in rounds past, and keep their ns down by getting themselves nuked, something Hellas often avoids in THEIR chosen wars. Admirable and honorable, as I sit.

  10. I have been pretty inactive this round. I didn't even log in for the first couple days after the war ended, just as I missed the first twos days of this war for the same reason. The last time Cowboy and I talked was after TPC/Citadel's first war and the Hellas/TFK war were both looking very decided, if not officially over. We'd not warred yet but we were going to have to war soon.

     

    I think the end result of a war says as much as anything about how hard a war was picked. Citadel took almost no damage in their first war, nor did Hellas or TPC. Citadel had more nukes than we did in this war, in part, because their top nations were able to keep buying nukes throughout their war and after it. Citadel's top nations weren't knocked out of the top 5%, because they took almost no damage - and they rarely got nuked. It worked out the same way for TPC and Hellas, of course.

     

    We were going to war someone, and sooner rather than later. Solely because of the way those wars went down, our top 3 potential targets were going to have be Hellas, TPC, Citadel or some combination of them. That was both mine and Cowboy's decision, before their wars were even over. None of them took enough significant damage to take them off our potential targets list. We have 50+ members after all. We need a lot of nations to fight anyways.

     

    Aside: The warchest whining? I answer that with the wise words of Einer. We were going to war someone, make no mistake about it. If Citadel had more warchest and less infra and nukes, it's ns would have been lower and we might have had more nukes than Citadel did. That's generally unacceptable for us. Cowboy would probably have paired Citadel up with Hellas instead of Hades.

     

    If I had a bunch of free time and was in charge this round, and the final choice for this war had been mine? In the interest of finding a hard war against deserving opponents, I'd probably have tried to get someone smaller to go with us (WAPA maybe?) and hit both Citadel and Hellas OR perhaps more likely, hit TPC and someone else. Or, if luck was really with my deal-making skills, I'd have found enough nations to hit all three alliances. Whoever we war, whoever our leaders are, our targets generally need to have bigger average nations than ourselves and more nukes, or they aren't worthy of our war.

     

     

     To: Cowboy From: kong92 Date: 4/15/2013 5:52:49 PM

    Subject: RE: Warriors having attacked
    Message: What you did I would't have done even to the worst of the enemies.

    Let's not pretend we are friends.
    I've approached you as a friend at the round start, as I used to do it with Clash each round.
    You didn't say anything to me directly whether you like my suggestions or not.
    Instead, you've chosen to hit us when we were just out of war.It's a treacherious act of a snake..

    Don't ever pretend to be a friend.

    NO need to continue those conversations.

    There is no integrity in the Warriors left, once you are in charge

     

    Tread more carefully, kong.

     

    In this war, both alliances we warred against had higher average nation strength than we did. You can't say the same. In this war, our targets not only had more nukes than we did to start, they still do after the war is over. You absolutely can't say the same. Swazz can stuff this reality up his Lohan: For our first war, we picked a significantly harder war than you did in your first war.

     

    Cowboy did just fine. In Warriors' tradition, he picked a legit updeclare,

    Cowboy and the government he has assembled has my fullest support.

     

     

     

    ./gargantuan wall o' text

  11. ^^^ What she said! x 17

     

    Even though I'm an inactive slacker slug this round, I still bought Admin a few pizzas as incentives. I'm not above bribing people with pizza. We all have to use what we got, and although I don't have JesusKitty's wide variety of "talents,"  I still gotta do what I can. There's still nearly 800 nations in TE, and that's more than enough to keep up the competition level and keep TE fun.

     

    o7 TE

    o7 Admin

    o7 Talents!

  12. Well, I remembered my password so I'll post. I generally hate the owf, it's awfully depressing reading in general. I'm busy enough these days I should be asleep by now anyways, so I'll throw a bunch of crap in this post them probably not post again.

     

    As far spy gov ops and the like go, I had this very conversation with a Hellas guy (finnandjake?) just the other round. I kinda forget which one, those Hellas guys all sort of blend together after a while :awesome:

     

    By now I have fought against nearly every alliance there is in TE except the newest ones, and 3 times as many alliances that don't exist anymore. They are very common spy attacks and have been used against me many times. I had reports that RE, OP and Hellas all did them against us when we fought them last round. As does Citadel, it seems. Pork Shrimp used to use them as an alliance-wide tactic (more so back when they were flag running regularly), and the PS-influenced Muscle Hamsters used them against RE last round when we fought together. As does TPC.

     

    I argued with King James about them the last time we fought TPC a few rounds ago, and he basically said get over it lol. When we fought alongside TPC against Hellas, TFK and Catharsis two rounds ago, it was the first time I remember ever seeing spy gov and spy religion columns put on a target list. TPC were very systematic about making sure opposing nations got them both. Apparently TPC sees war as not only how much damage you dish out in a war, but how fast you rebuild from a war. I have seen TPC accused of turtling at times in wars that aren't going well for them (I think Hellas mentioned it last round's war with them), and it might be explained by this philosophy.

     

    Myself, I tend to agree with the Jesuskitty and Jake. They are not really even part of the war being fought, especially not for nations that have been nuked and usually won't be collecting until some time after the war. They are used to weaken nations post-war rather then at war. I actually WANT my opponents to rebuild well. In Warriors' history, we have often times fought alongside an alliance after we have warred against them, as part of our Friends Through War policy. Such attacks are likely to leave a sour taste in your opponents mouth that inhibits future cooperation. They are really more one of those SE carryover things, where spiteful grudges can last literally years, as opposed to just a round or 2.

     

    Anyways. Gov, religion, IRS, I've never been one to do those very often and I won't use them this war either. The exceptions are when someone does them to me and gets caught, or when someone (usually flag runners) has a whole crapload of warchest yet turtles anyways. In both cases, they have earned it. As I said to Jesuskitty in pm, I officially crap upon the flag, so there you go.

     

    However. While we do not practice them as an alliance-wide policy, many many Warriors have had these spy ops used against them systematically over the rounds. Some of them have picked up the practice and use them as they see fit, and I do not think it right to tell them differently. After all, it's used by just about somebody in every war, and by just about everybody is some wars. They are a legal part of the game. So we leave it up to the individual to decide when to use them and leave it at that.

     

    ----

     

    As far as this war choice goes, meh. Sometimes you're damned if you do and damned if you don't. We got left out of the early wars this round and you have to war somebody or someone snivels about it. Yet as everyone else has warred already, it would have to be our 1st war against their 2nd war. I think that happens to someone every round. it happened to TPC two rounds ago and to RE and tW last round. So screw it.

     

    We picked out a couple alliances that didn't seem to take a lot of damage in their first wars, both of whom had a higher average ns than us and who had more combined nukes than us (even tho they were pretty much all Citadels, who STILL has more nukes than we do.) If we had been a bit bigger, maybe we would have warred TPC or Hellas instead of Hades. I think someone was going to be unhappy no matter what and no matter who we attacked, that was inevitable. At least we picked worthy opponents, and as the always honorable Getabeer said, it turned out to be quite a heavyweight match-up.

     

    Even though I was a couple days late due to being an inactive slacker and slug, I still managed to get in some fun. Here's props out to Jesuskitten, Warhammer, mr pink, Arostock and theBOOM of Citadel, all of whom did their alliance proud in blowing me up. Especially to the first two for hitting me and waking me up, as too often the only wars I get are the ones I pick. Also my gratitude to Lord Hersey of Hades who took my last nuke, which saves me on bills during rebuilding. Thanks bro!

     

    Cowboy of Texas is mostly running tW this round, and he's doing just fine so far. Cowboy has all my support, as do the rest of our gov this round. I've got just too much going on right now in life to do much more than fight and this wall o' text will probably be my last post for a while. I hate this place anyways lol.

     

    Carry on, folks.

  13. Declare on three nuclear nations and whine, that's CN logic.

    I don't think he whined at all, I've noticed that's one of your fave stupid lines tho. However he did complain that his attackers won't give him casualties, that's what he meant by turtle nuked, nations that nuke only and do nothing else. Ticked me off when you guys did to me, too. By the end of our war, my warslots were full of turtles :P

     

    I think this thread left some people drama-deprived, so they gotta make it up to find it lol

  14.  Most Attacking Casualties

    1) 221,580 Soldiers Lost - RoadRash of Rashville - Yellow Team

    2) 203,513 Soldiers Lost - bcortell of Macto - Blue Team

    3) 176,873 Soldiers Lost - Lorlax of Lorlaxistan - Yellow Team

    4) 173,057 Soldiers Lost - KillerCruiser of North Empire - Yellow Team

    5) 169,293 Soldiers Lost - Doctor Who of City of Death - Blue Team

     Most Defending Casualties

    1) 246,503 Soldiers Lost - KillerCruiser of North Empire - Yellow Team

    2) 202,828 Soldiers Lost - Oppaa of Gangnam - Yellow Team

    3) 193,280 Soldiers Lost - ChessTyrant of ChessLand - Black Team

    4) 192,143 Soldiers Lost - Therm of Impulsive - Black Team

    5) 188,816 Soldiers Lost - Ben Mason of Second Mass - Black Team

    Total Soldier Casualties
     
    1) 419,560 Total Soldiers Lost - KillerCruiser of North Empire - Yellow Team

    2) 364,983 Total Soldiers Lost - RoadRash of Rashville - Yellow Team

    3) 344,969 Total Soldiers Lost - bcortell of Macto - Blue Team

    4) 321,257 Total Soldiers Lost - Clash of Discord - Red Team

    5) 310,556 Total Soldiers Lost - Lorlax of Lorlaxistan - Yellow Team




    Moi:

    Number of Soldiers Lost in All Wars: 139,983 Attacking + 181,274 Defending = 321,257 Casualties

    Casualty Rank: Ranked #4 of 609 Nations (0.66%)

     

    Yeahhhhhh wenches!

  15. Clash you started the war as almost 15k ns, now you are almost 7k, sure you crushed everyone and you received no damage.

     


    Strawmen STILL suck.

     

    Almania infra: 91.06 (Peak Infrastructure 2,299.99)

    Chaos infra: 1,081.81 (Peak Infrastructure 2,999.73)

    Wasso infra: 248.19 (Peak Infrastructure 2,561.35)

     

    Discord: 1,447.42 (Peak Infrastructure 2,499.99)

     

    The math says they lost, on average, well over twice the infra I did and the last two had 4000k more NS than I did before the war started. I unquestionably won MY wars. Next time why don't YOU try me? I declared three wars on Hellas. Hellas declared no wars on me. Y'all 'fraid?

     

    Added: OK realllyyy don't like the new forums quote feature much :(

  16. First of all , I was fighting 5 nations by myself . You don't expect a lot when you're such situation . I might be close to ZI , but I'm proud of myself .

    - Turtles ? Yes I did turtle ONLY on the last day of the War . you don't expect me to buy and deploy soldiers to an unqual ground attack .

    - downdeclare : hmmm .. I shall remind you of your 3 multies who got deleted who down declared like hell on the first day of War , which was the reason that pushed us to kick them out of the game . And don't forget , we're 30 , your'e 50 .

    One more question , why do you cry a lot ? Or is it your strategy to get everyone's attention ?

     


    You were NOT by yourself, you just fought that way. Each of your wars had other wars too. I should expect better than THAT. Nor does that explain the number of defeat alerts I had on you :P

     

    Once again, just another stupid lie: No multies.

    Just another in a long line to stupid Hellas lies and BS.

     

    We DID have three nations who thought they had discovered a new way to avoid getting nukes spied away, one they didn't know happened to be against the rules. They were not aware it was, after all, it's an easy thing to catch. Twas done out of ignorance not malice. TE lost 3 good people over it. I'm not sure why you'd be proud of that - except you guys are lying weasels, and it's right in character.

     

    You were 30 with about a 2000ns per nation advantage, that was down to 400 by war's end. I think we have much better cash left after the war too, and when we start rebuilding, we will do so better than you will. We build better than you, we trade better than you, we war better than you and we warchest better than you.

     

    Crying is bleating crap like:

    "You guys have multis!"

    "You had twice as many nations as we did!"

    "You guys only attacked us cause you are TPC puppets!"

     

    Use tissue next time instead.

×
×
  • Create New...