Jump to content

Jocko Homo

Members
  • Posts

    277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jocko Homo

  1. [quote name='William Bonney' timestamp='1299477231' post='2655087']
    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=2818
    Do you mean these terms, that were stated to last for three months, during which time fan was a protectorate of the new pacific order until they violated said terms?
    [/quote]

    Uh, Gee. No. :wacko:

    Funny you should bring those up since while FAN was a protectorate of NPO, FAN was ATTACKED by NPO and then told that the new terms were "DIE"

    Are you really this ignorant or was your post a joke?

  2. [quote name='Thrash' timestamp='1299287948' post='2652926']
    I mean really, do you think all these alliances who suddenly switched sides for Karma and everyone else who went and settled their old grudges, went and apologized for what they put them through, or put in any more effort than Pacifica did? I think not. I think the discussions were more like: "We hate NPO.", "Us too.", "OK, you're forgiven."
    [/quote]

    We in FAN have settled our differences with [i]almost[/i] all of the VietFAN combatants. ALL of those alliances put in more effort than NPO did, by far. FAN have forged true friendships over the course of the last year and some of these friends are alliances we were fighting against in VietFAN. True story.

  3. [quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1299254185' post='2652490']
    We did not see the terms of this agreement and its conditions, meaning we do not then know what it exactly means so ultimately its whatever you say it is at the moment you refer to it. As such its secret and non tangible to us. [i][b]Then ultimately in my understanding it is non material and something that I do not recognize or can.[/b][/i]

    So henceforth then it is my personal view that this is a yet another war of aggression on my alliance without tangible reason, or without CB as understood in CN politics. As such it is a grievous act that has far reaching consequences, a random act of aggression which can only breed utmost hostility. And so it will.
    [/quote]

    I remember another guy who refused to recognize the obvious... It didn't work out well for him either.

    [img]http://www.thedailyrash.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bagdad_bob_large.gif[/img]

  4. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1299219130' post='2652147']
    Sorry son, but your leader/spokesman has a different opinion:

    As you can see FAN is still butt hurt with VietFAN, so don't come here with the trash talk about how FAN moved on from the past because you'll be just fooling yourself.
    [/quote]

    [img]http://www.audizine.com/gallery/data/507/crying_baby.jpg[/img]

    [quote name='Hereno' timestamp='1299219519' post='2652155']
    If I were your allies on the other side, I would be pretty upset by this. You essentially gave their obligations lip service so you could jump in here.
    [/quote]

    Actually, I think it is exactly the opposite. The reason their entry has been delayed for over a month is because they needed to cover their allies back and they did it 100% before they came here. They fulfilled their obligations totally despite the fact it actually put them on the opposite side of the conflict from the one they were planning on entering on. That's no lip service son, that's action.

  5. [quote name='Earogema' timestamp='1299218790' post='2652135']
    What about Rok? Is there something I'm missing with them?

    I also thought NPO was well covered, but I suppose another good mid tier alliance could be used to sweep em' up.
    [/quote]

    Actually, what we need is a 100 man alliance of infants armed with flyswatters.

    The problem is coverage. All the middle to decent sized NPO nations are in hiding. Those that didnt make it into peace mode are no longer middle to decent size anymore. So now we have a case where there are a bunch of tiny ass NPO nations running around and not enough small nations to fight them all. They are hurt and many are turtling but you still need nations to step on them and hold them down.

    I personally have been in 13 wars (12 offensive only 1 defensive) so far and that's because I'm a small nation. Many of our larger nations have only been in 1 or 2 wars, both from the initial round. There are simply no targets for them. Unbrella and MK are in much the same boat. GOONS is carrying most of the workload because they have the numbers in the range where there are targets. The best thing NoR will bring to the fight is their 100+ small nations. Their 80 or so larger nations will find the war picking virtually non-existent.

    So I say again, Welcome NoR

  6. [quote name='Ragashingo' timestamp='1299218453' post='2652127']
    Well honestly, they're both it seems. The reason nobody caught it is because we all assumed they had some honor and we were wrong. But that they snuck it through is a pretty big win on their part.
    [/quote]

    A lot of people caught it. And it was staring you in the face, it wasn't snuck through at all. NoR was just thinking ahead. :awesome:

  7. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1299218229' post='2652119']
    Yeah FAN really moved from the past, may be that's why you are attacking NPO for something they did a 3 years ago. -_-
    [/quote]

    Yes, we moved on from the past. That fact is clearly illustrated by the allies we are fighting beside. The issue we have is the NPO of TODAY.

  8. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1299217416' post='2652086']Help FAN in a offensive war against NPO over past grudges without any treaty to back it up when one of the main reasons for FAN being rolled by NPO was their attack against the 1st NoR is really ironic and sad.[/quote]

    Actually, this tangible proof that FAN has moved on from the past. FAN has many friends in CN and many of them are groups that we once had very rocky relationships with. In fact our list of close friends in 2011 is now strikingly similar to our list of enemies circa 2008, except for one glaring omission.

  9. [quote name='Finch' timestamp='1298181964' post='2639185']
    A nice sized gain in the midst of a giant war [img]http://polarorder.net/forum/Smileys/default/2z8u3hf.jpg[/img]
    [/quote]

    Any gain during a war is nice. NpO's total alliance strength increased by 26K in the 24 hours but gaining 3 new nations, one who is over 40K sure helped :lol1:

  10. [quote name='Seipher Caim' timestamp='1297376576' post='2628357']
    Jocko, get me those stats for received nukes and I'll use them but since the game does display only the total number of direct hits (received and sent), I wont try to get those myself ;)
    As for the color, I may indeed consider it...
    Glad you still lack my web despite my laziness to update it ;)
    [/quote]

    How about we meet in the middle. I'll drop my request for the received only nukes and you change the colors to all red/blue? OK :awesome:

    I still like it because it is far and away the best layout and most useful of all of them. :wub:

  11. [quote name='Seipher Caim' timestamp='1297342855' post='2627907']
    I'd like to point too that those numbers indicate the number of nukes launched AND received by an alliance...
    And last point, I do not comment or criticize anything in that map, I let you all do that job ;) My only opint of surprise while doing that was the low number of nukes surrounding the CnG battlefield... There may well be an explanation I would be glad to hear...
    [/quote]

    Wouldn't it me more useful if it just showed the number of nukes received? That's the true measure if how intense the war if for that particular alliance wouldn't you say?

    Also, <_< for still using confusing colors. It's just a mishmash now so can we just go red and blue, please?

×
×
  • Create New...