Jocko Homo

Jesus frickin christ, it's GONO's you retards!

I love it when my opponent turtles. The defeat alert I send them every day does as much if not more damage my ground attacks would and I still get to lob nukes, CM's and A/F attacks. The new defeat alert mechanism removes any advantage for turtling. I used to turtle all the time in VietFAN so I have no dislike for it, it just doesn't work anymore.

Have fun TOP!

[quote name='William Bonney' timestamp='1299478452' post='2655111'] I should ask you the same question, since you seem to not realize what lead to the new terms..... [/quote] and those new terms were........ wait for it..... "DIE" You really are that ignorant aren't you.

[quote name='William Bonney' timestamp='1299477231' post='2655087'] http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=2818 Do you mean these terms, that were stated to last for three months, during which time fan was a protectorate of the new pacific order until they violated said terms? [/quote] Uh, Gee. No. Funny you should bring those up since while FAN was a protectorate of NPO, FAN was ATTACKED by NPO and then told that the new terms were "DIE" Are you really this ignorant or was your post a joke?

[quote name='HeroofTime55' timestamp='1299445508' post='2654622']What alliances has Pacifica murdered, out of curiosity?[/quote] The terms NPO issued to FAN was literally "Die". NPO tried to murder FAN. There is no comeback to this very clear and well known fact. End. Of. Argument.

This announcement needs more Creed [img]http://images.buddytv.com/articles/Image/the-office/creed.jpg[/img]

[quote name='Thrash' timestamp='1299287948' post='2652926'] I mean really, do you think all these alliances who suddenly switched sides for Karma and everyone else who went and settled their old grudges, went and apologized for what they put them through, or put in any more effort than Pacifica did? I think not. I think the discussions were more like: "We hate NPO.", "Us too.", "OK, you're forgiven." [/quote] We in FAN have settled our differences with [i]almost[/i] all of the VietFAN combatants. ALL of those alliances put in more effort than NPO did, by far. FAN have forged true friendships over the course of the last year and some of these friends are alliances we were fighting against in VietFAN. True story.

The fact that anyone was surprised by this is what is surprising to me.

[quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1299254185' post='2652490'] We did not see the terms of this agreement and its conditions, meaning we do not then know what it exactly means so ultimately its whatever you say it is at the moment you refer to it. As such its secret and non tangible to us. [i][b]Then ultimately in my understanding it is non material and something that I do not recognize or can.[/b][/i] So henceforth then it is my personal view that this is a yet another war of aggression on my alliance without tangible reason, or without CB as understood in CN politics. As such it is a grievous act that has far reaching consequences, a random act of aggression which can only breed utmost hostility. And so it will. [/quote] I remember another guy who refused to recognize the obvious... It didn't work out well for him either. [img]http://www.thedailyrash.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bagdad_bob_large.gif[/img]

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1299219130' post='2652147'] Sorry son, but your leader/spokesman has a different opinion: As you can see FAN is still butt hurt with VietFAN, so don't come here with the trash talk about how FAN moved on from the past because you'll be just fooling yourself. [/quote] [img]http://www.audizine.com/gallery/data/507/crying_baby.jpg[/img] [quote name='Hereno' timestamp='1299219519' post='2652155'] If I were your allies on the other side, I would be pretty upset by this. You essentially gave their obligations lip service so you could jump in here. [/quote] Actually, I think it is exactly the opposite. The reason their entry has been delayed for over a month is because they needed to cover their allies back and they did it 100% before they came here. They fulfilled their obligations totally despite the fact it actually put them on the opposite side of the conflict from the one they were planning on entering on. That's no lip service son, that's action.

[quote name='Earogema' timestamp='1299218790' post='2652135'] What about Rok? Is there something I'm missing with them? I also thought NPO was well covered, but I suppose another good mid tier alliance could be used to sweep em' up. [/quote] Actually, what we need is a 100 man alliance of infants armed with flyswatters. The problem is coverage. All the middle to decent sized NPO nations are in hiding. Those that didnt make it into peace mode are no longer middle to decent size anymore. So now we have a case where there are a bunch of tiny ass NPO nations running around and not enough small nations to fight them all. They are hurt and many are turtling but you still need nations to step on them and hold them down. I personally have been in 13 wars (12 offensive only 1 defensive) so far and that's because I'm a small nation. Many of our larger nations have only been in 1 or 2 wars, both from the initial round. There are simply no targets for them. Unbrella and MK are in much the same boat. GOONS is carrying most of the workload because they have the numbers in the range where there are targets. The best thing NoR will bring to the fight is their 100+ small nations. Their 80 or so larger nations will find the war picking virtually non-existent. So I say again, Welcome NoR

[quote name='Ragashingo' timestamp='1299218453' post='2652127'] Well honestly, they're both it seems. The reason nobody caught it is because we all assumed they had some honor and we were wrong. But that they snuck it through is a pretty big win on their part. [/quote] A lot of people caught it. And it was staring you in the face, it wasn't snuck through at all. NoR was just thinking ahead.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1299218229' post='2652119'] Yeah FAN really moved from the past, may be that's why you are attacking NPO for something they did a 3 years ago. [/quote] Yes, we moved on from the past. That fact is clearly illustrated by the allies we are fighting beside. The issue we have is the NPO of TODAY.