Jump to content

Xavii

Members
  • Posts

    846
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Xavii

  1. [quote name='Lusitan' timestamp='1296886240' post='2620088']
    Oh come on, not even NpO needed 3 sanctioned alliances :P
    [/quote]
    Quotes like these is one of the reason (MK/Umbrella) didn't bother posting a DoW over 1 or 2 wars. Every time it never fails.

    Generic message:
    "LOL They needed X alliances to take us/them down. We're totally awesome. How fail X alliance is for calling in their allies"

    (Not directed only at you Lusitan, but I had to pick one. :v: )

  2. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1296834721' post='2619293']
    Since the first strike against NPO was based on TOP first strike against CnG and since the leader of MK and various others members of MK, plus members of other alliances like Umbrella, GOONS, ODN, Ronin said that TOP hadn't a CB against CnG, I must conclude that there aren't a CB against NPO too.
    [/quote]
    To be fair, the quote you used from me simply stated that I thought TOP was to paranoid and it led to them attacking MK, not about the validity of the CB itself. :v:

  3. [quote name='MagicalTrevor' timestamp='1296790250' post='2618676']
    Yes, that is simple and is my exact point in fact. We stated this fact to ML last night. Saying that our attacks on TPF were sanctioned. And their response was to tell us they weren't sanctioned and ML treated them as rogue attacks.We told them that we were at war with TPF and they tried to be smart arses and say we weren't due to no OWF post. Our response was that ML could either let the nations go as rogues, or we will officially recognise a state of war between the allances. It is now over 24 hours later and no word. Therefore ML are honouring their treaty with TPF (as is their right) and we, being the gentlemen we are, are acknowledging the state of war that is between all 3 of us.


    I have explained that terribly but there is literally no issue at all here other than people seemingly expecting MK/Umb to not honour the doomhouse accords.
    [/quote]
    I simply quote this as the situation is pretty much identical to Umbrella's. It's been said.

  4. [quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1296789011' post='2618608']
    So let me get it straight, unsanctioned members from your alliances attack members of an alliance you have not declared on, a direct MDoAP partner of TPF, treats them as rogues (as these are attacks against alliances by two alliances that have not declared war on TPF), and then suddenly you're all upset and butthurt over these actions?

    Up is not down, the sky is not pink, and yes, as usual, you're full of !@#$.

    We'll see if ML has good allies who have the balls to respond to this act of aggression against ML.
    [/quote]
    Read the op again. All Umbrella attacks on TPF we're sanctioned but we didn't bother cluttering up the OWF with DoW's over 1 or 2 wars declared. We continued to tell ML about this but they still claimed our nations were "rouges" and refused to back down, 24 hours later we are here.

  5. [quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1296371306' post='2610727']
    You sure showed us how much pixels matter!

    EDIT: And Rugby, while those two do not represent GATO as a whole (thankfully), you should probably leave your holier than thou attitude out of your posts. It doesn't reflect well on you either.
    [/quote]
    It's less about the pixels and more that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones kinda thing.

×
×
  • Create New...