Starcraftmazter
-
Posts
2,690 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Starcraftmazter
-
-
You have no intention of giving anyone screenshots.
I spent 1.5B fighting DBDC over the past month. I personally took over 30k nation strength off of a nuke turtle. There are several more in my alliance who can say the same. We've done our work. You have no intention of giving screenshots to anyone.
Give this man some screenshots!
The leaks I provided obviously states that GPA will be safe for 6 months and then is their turn to be annihilated.
Conjecture.
This is only to educate/warn those that their days are counted but apparently IRON thinks they're safe by a Treaty LOL!! You see Iron, you can always cancel treaties and switch to the other side :)
IRON isn't just treatied to DBDC, at this stage they have treaties with allies of DBDC....
What do you propose is going to happen, everyone just backstabs IRON on a cold night all at once? After railing on them so hard for their actions relating to NG? Do you honestly put forward this as your master theory? -
Crybaby.
Pot calling the kettle back.
-
Sure this has already been discussed in the previous thread but you guys wanted SS's so there you go!
The Claims were DBDC planning to hit GPA well there you go! It also shows their intentions to hit OBR so THERE YOU GO!!
Moderation issues are not to be discussed here and will be released at it's given time.
I still have countless more screenshots ready to be shown to those who join the cause and eliminating this threat immediately from Bob. C'mon guys where is that warrior spirit we have historically had over the years. Don't wait till tomorrow and see your nation and alliance mates in ruins when you can preempt todayIf only your nation was big enough to attack us... then you wouldn't have to coerce others to do your dirty work :facepalm:
-
You don't "accidentally" declare 4 offensive wars, and you allegedly had no interest in attacking the allies of your allies and yet RIA was attacked multiple times while supposedly on the do not raid list, to pretend as though it's a mistake and not oya biting off more than you guys could handle at the time is disingenuous of you.
We'll have to agree to disagree on that, not much more I can say - if you choose to not believe, that's up to you. -
Well I hope you're not DBDC's foreign affairs guy, then. ;>_>
Indeed I'm not. -
That'd mean you actually didn't shy away from those who could threaten you, I recall Cuba and friends joining #gpa awfully quick to save oyababy's ass.
We look out for our friends, even when they make mistakes. We also have no interest in a war with GPA, hence why we really wanted to avoid any sort of confrontation like that (quite to the contrary of the picture some would like to paint...).and absolutely nothing about the actually incriminating stuff (which should only be placed in the appropriate moderation forum anyway).
That sort of "stuff" simply does not exist. -
Sentiments like this are why I don't understand why DBDC isn't super-interested in setting things right with my alliance. >_> The RIA's entire existence has been an uphill battle, from the LUE raids to the first string of losing battles starting with GW3 to the Dave-Grudge War era to now.
Prior to reading that statement, I had no idea things were not right between DBDC and RIA? Certainly the first I've heard of it. -
I really do hope that people attack us, right now life is just too easy.
While I have no doubt a full blown out war against GPA would be fun, I highly doubt we'd be the ones starting it. -
One persons idea of fun may mean constant war, anothers may be constant peace and building.
I think to play the game like that, so as to build up your nation and avoid war is a challenge in itself, and I think the fact that there's always a possibility of war adds to that challenge and only makes it more fun and rewarding.
Also to add is the fact that quite often war can give your nation a leg up in it's growth and development. -
Why seek safety if the purpose and fun lies with war?
Nobody who fears an uphill battle will find us as their allies, this is a fact. Taking that further, if you seek safety, the only thing you will find is war and defeat at the hands of those who seek battle.
That being said, I do want to emphasise before the above is taken out of context, that no actual technically neutral alliance has been touched by DBDC. -
Perhaps you had better go back to the drawing board, come back and tell us what your alliance really stands for. Good luck going forward.
Perhaps you and others in your alliance should find a hobby which does not involve meaningless trash talk and discussion hijacking against us and our allies and their allies.
We aren't the sort to make any plans to act based on the butthurt of some people, but I just thought I'd let you know how pathetic it looks for your group if you engage in such pitiful activities. -
Welcome to the world, a fine protector you have there.
-
especially when warchests are so huge these days, a decent sized nations makes well over 9 mil a day. sending 9 mil every 10 days isn't going to break the bank, considering what it would cost to buy that tech yourself it's a jackpot.
i will no longer do 6/100 deals. i hope more tech sellers do the same so we can put pressure on the tech market to increase the price to a more reasonable lvl. we sellers are a scare resource. what happens when a commodity is scarce, it becomes more valuable. we need to use our power to help ourselves!
It doesn't matter how much money it is, what matters is how quickly you accumulate tech.
The standard is 1 slot of money (how much ever money the seller can accept) for 2 slots of tech.
Only slot efficiency matters, nothing else does. -
Just a note on one improvement, some alliances have their names abbreviated in some questions, and full names in others - this seems quite inconsistent and could potentially skew results, as those alliances where their name is not abbreviated stand out more if all or most of the rest are abbreviated.
-
DBDC'S lack of desire to communicate
With you. Communicate with you. -
I look forward to this war ending so your lot can be forgotten about. Your mentality is so, so repulsive.
Oh, why won't anyone please think of the children?In any case, I typed out a thoughtful question in the private DBDC embassy that formal members of DBDC are welcomed to visit and answer :)
Might be waiting a while. -
I don't think you have a belief system other than Might Makes Right. It is the belief system of bullies and cowards.
I think, "there's no right or wrong, it's just for fun" is more appropriate. Peace is not fun for anyone relevant. In my view this is the healthy attitude to take.
That thousands of nations have disappeared from Planet Bob once Might Makes Right replaced diplomacy, rhetoric and discourse is absolutely the case. As I noted earlier, at one point there were 45,000 nations -- 12,000 of which were non-aligned. They were left largely unmolested until general war was declared upon the independents and small alliances. Now there about 500 non-aligned left and so, small and then medium-sized alliances were then targeted once the non-aligned were flayed and then discarded. Now there really are no large alliances left.
If this is your understanding of history then it is deeply flawed, the commonly agreed upon to version is that after Karma (the ending of a period where might makes right was by far the strongest), people got bored, and that is when the numbers started strongly dwindling. It definitely has nothing to do with DBDC which would not come for many years after.
Quite frankly, I think you lack a basic understanding of our world or simply choose to ignore it. You thoughts are disconnected from reality. -
Win what, exactly? Things that you have robbed from others at the expense of your own virtue and honor [not to say you had any in the first place]. Ours is not only intact, it is stronger than ever. These are things that parasites lacking in values cannot loot.
I can't really argue this because I do not share your belief system with regard to that statement.In your twisted minds, destruction is the same thing as creation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_destruction
About as relevant as anything else you post.So many instead have chosen to leave Planet Bob for good rather than exist in a world divided between the sheep and the wolves. Those who remain are cowed into silence -- except those few who realize they have nothing left to lose regarding their nations and are thus free to express themselves. :P
That's quite a wild claim, and one without historic precedence. The number of nations has nothing to do with DBDC or this war.No, I am not saying that my words have the power to do any such thing -- except to expose you as the vile, prevaricating, sociopathic looters that you are. The bonds that hold your coalition together are those of convenience only and therefore it will be you who are the ones who break them when you once again become bored or have wrenched all you could from your allies. Once these satellite alliances have served their purposes as meat-shields, they will be discarded like so much trash and set upon by the mindless, slavering mob that makes up your core constituency.
Once again, nobody is forced or coerced into fighting, alliances fight because they want to, because their members are bored. To that end, everyone loses as much as they want, they can pull out anytime, or participate to whatever little extent they deem necessary.Indeed your record does speak for itself. Your word isn't worth spit. Your loyalty only goes as far as what you can manipulate or intimidate your allies to do for you.
And what in CN history serves precedence for these accusations? -
Will you go out on a limb and say that applies to every single alliance on your side in this coalition?
Like all coalitions, most alliances aren't really overly involved with each other, it's just the way the treaty web plays out. Whatever the next war will be will probably look from at least somewhat to totally different, it's just the way it is. -
Oh, please. Do not pretend ignorance. It is the alliances that have been sent in to suffer the losses in the lower tiers where yours has very little representation.
You are really quite delusional.
These are not isolated instances concerning those sent in to fight alongside you. It is embarrassing how inept and unmotivated many of them are. You people are experienced and had to have known to expect this from your allies, but you sent them in anyway just to take up war slots. So I do indeed maintain that they have been exploited.
No, we actually don't keep track of the precise level of activity and experience of every single nation in every single allied alliance, as well as allied allied alliances and so forth, nor are we aware of all the external circumstances which may prevent them from being active at that specific time.
Are one of the objectives of this war that you are supposed to be seen as "badass"? The fact that through what I still maintain had to be manipulation you got a dozen alliances to join you in piling on to ours, makes your lot cowards. Showing the world that you felt the need to get so much help by calling in so many pawns is a back-handed expression of respect towards New Polar Order.
I would have no problem at all fighting along side my friends regardless of whom was or wasn't on our side, and I'm sure we'd still win. That being said, if other alliances want a slice of the pie, we are not going to withhold it from them. Every alliance is sovereign and has it's own decisions to make, there is zero interference nor pressure. Every alliance has the right to go to war if they so choose, and as far as I am aware, it is generally favourably viewed and an act to be desired - not an act that brings "suffering" and "losses. If your side views war as a circumstance which results in bad outcomes, I am not surprised at the results it is producing for you. For us, war is a time of excitement and fun.Regardless of what their ultimate objective is, make no mistake: These people are a cancer and should be treated as such. They cannot be trusted as allies. They will use you and then throw you away when you are no longer needed. Then they will start raiding YOU.
If you believe your empty words will break the bonds that bound us together you are deeply mistaken. Alliances like AZTEC or DT-DBDC have much tighter integration and communication than anything comparable on your side. To even fathom betrayal is a laughable concept.
Ultimately our record speaks for itself. -
I am only speaking from my own experience, but the outer ring of the coalition attacking us does not seem to have much heart in this. They do not seem to be particularly well-trained, either. I think that they were promised something positive from declaring war on us, that we would be easy prey who would be ripe for the pickings. That is not been the case nor shall it be so long as these attacks continue.
I have no idea what you mean by "outer ring of the coalition", however;
- Nobody has been promised anything
- If alliances don't want to participate, then they shouldn't, and wouldn't, and nor would I care if they didn't
- How "well trained" people are, as always, depends on the circumstances, the alliance, the individual experience, etc - it cannot be so broadly generalised about as you would proclaimIt is a pity how badly you have exploited your comrades in this way.
As per above, nobody is being exploited.New hatreds are being sown due to offenses that will be long remembered.
Way too serious, take a chill pill. -
I'm sure those 12 alliances you manipulated into joining into this conflict will be happy to hear how much credit they are getting for the losses they have suffered in this undeclared war of aggression that you started. There are stats available that anyone can review to see if your alliance is actually bearing the brunt of these losses as you imply.
I don't think anyone cares about any "credit", nor "losses". Most people I know would jump at the opportunity to break the boredom and fight a war, nobody has been coerced or manipulated into war...
I also don't think its' accurate to describe fighting a war as "suffering".You seem to think you can dictate who gets to be within the top 250, all you're really going to do long term is determine who gets to exist in peace in the rest of the world, and I suspect it will not be those who support these attacks that cost years of progress with no valid justification.
It does seem like we can, not that we want to. It's an effect, and outcome - not a cause nor a goal. -
Nobody is trying to dictate anything, but expect there to be consequences that you might not expect. When you beat and loot from enough people and make others suffer the damage as you use them as pawns, it can only go on for so long.
Who's a pawn? In any given war, a DBDC nation takes far more damage than anyone else, that's just how it works up there in the ranks. Bigger nation = more damage, both dealt and given. So DBDC gets hurt more than any of it's allies.
Furthermore, in order to have fun and interest, there must be conflict. In order for a fun conflict, there must be two opposing sides. DBDC does not have anything to do with this rule.
I really feel sorry for you and yours if all you can take satisfaction from is what you can take from others. They are just objects that are perishable and replaceable.
As I said, other things that have much more value cannot be taken or destroyed -- things that you will never have. Ever.
This isn't Harry Potter bro, calm down. -
Eh, I wouldn't say they don't play politics at all. It's more that they're trying to play an entirely different brand of politics. Eventually, barring the world turning to that specific brand of politics, support will run out.
Not sure why you think you can dictate to us (or anyone) how to run our alliances, and how to engage in the world of politics.So by all means, keep on wasting resources on us and see what it gets you.
So far, a lot of land and tech.
Glorious Peace
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Happy to see all parties come to resolve their differences :)