Jump to content

Meterman

Members
  • Posts

    354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Meterman

  1. ~ are in this war until the final surrender. If UJP alliances aren't willing to fight the same that is their prerogative.
    You say this speaking for all of ~?

    I cannot speak for ~ but I can for IRON. A ceasefire would need to involve two parties. In our book & the context that it is being used it is called 'laying down'. We do not consider it a ceasefire and therefore have not let up on attacks.

    Even though I cannot speak for ~, I believe that all of ~ understands the difference between a ceasefire & a "ceasefire".

    Now a question for \m/:

    Will your compadres be joining you back on the \m/ AA?

  2. What is stupid is the fact that UJP is implying in numerous threads that this so called ceasefire is being participated in by both sides.

    Only the UJP have proclaimed a ceasefire. IRON and the rest of ~ refuses a ceasefire and calls for surrender terms.

    A one-sided ceasefire is in fact NOT A CEASEFIRE!

  3. The reason why i created this thread was due to the OP in Overlord Shinnnnnnnnnra's (sp) wartime stats thread, where it clearly states that there is a global ceasefire.

    I have posted in that thread to inform the OP that there is no global ceasefire and that it would be good if he did not spread incorrect information to nations who do not know better. If UJP is really that 'honorable' they would stipulate that the ceasefire is one sided and therefore not a ceasefire at all.

  4. While I appreciate and agree that your stats should be pinned (MODS), I find it unacceptable that you are declaring ceasefire on your OP. UJP has called for a ceasefire but there is no ceasefire in effect between UJP & ~.

    Maybe you could explain that the ceasefire is only being practiced by the UJP members who proclaimed it.

    IRON and others in ~ will not accept ceasefire - only surrender terms.

    Thank you!

  5. Yes.
    I can't speak for Genmay or \m/, but in MK I have not seen anyone mistake this for a two way ceasefire, but I mostly hang around irc where most are very active members.

    You are not looking hard enough. The first post in this very thread from your buddy seems a little ambiguous if you ask me. That answer would be construed as confirmation of a ceasefire.

    We have not been contacted by any UJP to ask for a ceasefire. I suspect that if we were, the conversation would quickly turn to surrender terms and reparations - not a ceasefire.

  6. @OP

    First, thank you for your sekritz.

    Second, you ramble on as if you know you are going to lose. I understand towing the MK line but that is how it came off.

    Third, you seem to have already accepted being ZI'd

    We fully intend to fight ferociously against our enemies, no matter how much damage you cause to us. You can take every single last one of us to ZI and we'll still be standing.

    Lastly, I can assure you, by no means, do we think you are down & out and we know better than to underestimate UJP. So we will take your advice here.

    Do not keep making the mistake of thinking that we are down and out.

    Here's to you!

  7. No, i have looked at the nukes screen and it is clear that IRON/NpO are nuke first striking. How dishonorable you guys are especially after signing that treaty.

    I can absolutely assure you that any nuclear strikes by IRON has been done only in retaliation to a first strike from GOONs. As our DoW states we will not first strike with nukes. This may or may not change as the war continues.

    edit: Here is the IRON DoW

×
×
  • Create New...