Jump to content

Haven for Peace

Members
  • Posts

    986
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Haven for Peace

  1. Wow... grave dig.

    But <3 to everyone.

    Azure, I'll try to... sprinkle some magic dust on you later. ;)

    SpacingOutMan, not true! I left out a lot of people unintentionally... your levels of awesomeness was off my chart. Also, how can I not love you? You once promised me something special. :P

  2. [quote name='Hunterman1043' timestamp='1342318922' post='3010330']
    Aid does not equal military assistance. Now would we have been fine with y'all like sending packets of foreign aid with like $3mil/50tech/2000soldiers.... Probably so. I mean that fits with a PIAT.... However y'all decided to just say "$%&@ it," and full on attacked anyway on an aggressive war. [b]oA means Optional Aggression; not Optional Aid.[/b] Y'all knew what you were doing and now that it backfired, you're trying to cover y'alls ass.
    [/quote]
    Yes, we knew what we were doing. Nothing has backfired. Before our treaty was ratified, both alliances agreed and were aware that Aid means ANY aid. I don't really care what the rest of CN thinks.

    [quote name='legion-x' timestamp='1342335513' post='3010417']
    what would we be without this endless debates. e-lawyers are never in short supply on this forums. NEAT and PPO im sure you guys wanted in this war and wanted to defend your allies. nothing wrong with that. GPF you just wanted to attack us, were cool with that too cuz as you can see our allies like to come to our parties too. i mean sure its a lame attempt with the PIAT, i mean when we believe war= aid we just put a oA option in the treaty( for reference our old treaty with i believe TOOL).
    [/quote]
    In case you forgot, LoSS once activated a PIAT for war. (Now if I am wrong, I am sorry, I am basing the information on CN wiki.)

    At least for the PPO and GPF, we made sure it means aid of any kind.

  3. [quote name='Erixxxx' timestamp='1342092640' post='3009047']
    I may have missed something since it's announcement, but isn't this treaty a PIAT? Last I checked they don't have a Defense clause. Or oA for that matter.
    [/quote]

    [quote name='Dark Temptation' timestamp='1342138977' post='3009427']
    This will be fun.

    EDIT: I would pay big money to see the logs of the conversation that happened before this DoW. Probably hilarious.

    "Hey guys, wanna hit LoSS with us?"
    "But we aren't even MDP partners..."
    "No, no, it's cool! Nobody e-lawyers in CN anymore!"
    "Oh, sweet. Sure!"
    [/quote]

    For those who commented on the PPO - GPF treaty, we just want to clarify that it is understood between both alliances before the treaty was ratified that Aid in PIAT meant we could request aid of any type at anytime for any reason.

    Awesome:

    [quote name='Bordiga' timestamp='1342095809' post='3009066']
    While having the ability to read the wiki is a valuable skill, being able to read the treaties themselves is even better..
    [/quote]

×
×
  • Create New...