[quote name='Hunterman1043' timestamp='1342318922' post='3010330']
Aid does not equal military assistance. Now would we have been fine with y'all like sending packets of foreign aid with like $3mil/50tech/2000soldiers.... Probably so. I mean that fits with a PIAT.... However y'all decided to just say "$%&@ it," and full on attacked anyway on an aggressive war. [b]oA means Optional Aggression; not Optional Aid.[/b] Y'all knew what you were doing and now that it backfired, you're trying to cover y'alls ass.
[/quote]
Yes, we knew what we were doing. Nothing has backfired. Before our treaty was ratified, both alliances agreed and were aware that Aid means ANY aid. I don't really care what the rest of CN thinks.
[quote name='legion-x' timestamp='1342335513' post='3010417']
what would we be without this endless debates. e-lawyers are never in short supply on this forums. NEAT and PPO im sure you guys wanted in this war and wanted to defend your allies. nothing wrong with that. GPF you just wanted to attack us, were cool with that too cuz as you can see our allies like to come to our parties too. i mean sure its a lame attempt with the PIAT, i mean when we believe war= aid we just put a oA option in the treaty( for reference our old treaty with i believe TOOL).
[/quote]
In case you forgot, LoSS once activated a PIAT for war. (Now if I am wrong, I am sorry, I am basing the information on CN wiki.)
At least for the PPO and GPF, we made sure it means aid of any kind.