AndrewHG
-
Posts
420 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by AndrewHG
-
-
MI6 in the barrel tonight
-
Got to keep Stagger happy ;)
-
-
Ah well spotted. That could describe a few alliances these days I guess. Fixed.
-
-
Setting aside the abuse from cubaquerida. I'll look for another format soon. No DoWs tonight?
-
it's like a dreamcatcher, only with nukes. Sorry for messing up the entire warmap. Also I'm fairly certain we're abbreviated DBDC you dyslexic fuck.
Yeah right. You realise the word filter actually doesn't work when you are quoted. PM me the apology. That'll do.
-
that is the best format yet!
-
-
-
Oh please. If it was kept on the DL for so long and obfuscated even from allies like IRON, where does Polar's CB come from? Keep your lines straight.
The fact of the matter is that everybody knew this war was coming sooner or later, and IRON decided to plot against their own allies at the behest of TOP. They got manipulated into abandoning a stalwart ally, and not only are they going to look awful to the entire planet for it, but now there's quite a bit less standing between TOP and getting to roll IRON. You're not fighting Polar's war of defense, you're fighting TOP's war of aggression, and that is obvious to everybody smart enough not to believe OWF propaganda. Spend less time making flow charts and more time critically thinking about the consequences of this war beyond "wooo lol fuck NSO!"
I entirely acknowledge your frustration and anger.. was that a yes then? Might as well come clean on for the record.
-
IRON clearly shows they don't care about the contents of a treaty. Intel or Military clauses.
Guess it depends whether NSO and NG involved them and others when planning.
Did you involve them?
-
I guess... of course... you'll know the answer already Auctor
If they did know of the plot.. it would have been shared with GLOF as intel by IRON
By extension then
Was GLOF involved with a plot against NpO?
-
hellfire!! My bad XD
So they knew about the polar roller plot at the time?
-
SO WHICH WAS IT?
Either way I have to report this as an official car crash thread.
-
ok noted thanks.
-
EQ was just one big smoke and fire factory. Nothing changed.
-
Thanks
This is the Doombird Doomcave edition. Clearly they are fluxing around chipping away at alliances.
-
Those logs were leaked either way. A swipe too far.
-
Lord Ubuntu please peruse the following shamelessly ripped from the heart of the CN wiki.
Mutual Aggression and Defense Pacts (often referred to as MADPs or MDAPs)
are a type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances
agree to defend each other from attack by other alliances and to support
each other in wars of aggression.MADPs are the strongest type of interalliance military treaty in the Cyberverse. On the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties, they are one step above MDoAP's.
Mutual Defense and Optional Aggression Pacts (often referred to as MDoAP's)
are a type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances
agree to defend each other from attack by other alliances. Optionally,
they may support each other in wars of aggression, but this is not
required.There is also a variant of the MDoAP and you may see it sometimes as MnDoAP. MnDoAP is the acronym for Mutual Defense and Optional Aggression Pacts that have a non-chaining clause in them, (here's an example of a non-chaining clause).
The non-chaining clause is put into some MDoAP or MADP's so that if one
signatory assists another alliance via a separate treaty, the treaty
with the non-chaining clause becomes optional. These are used to limit
to expansion of conflicts if people don't want to be involved for one
reason or another.They are one step above MDP's and one step below MADP's on the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties.
Mutual Defense and Optional Aggression Pacts (often referred to as MDoAP's)
are a type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances
agree to defend each other from attack by other alliances. Optionally,
they may support each other in wars of aggression, but this is not
required.There is also a variant of the MDoAP and you may see it sometimes as MnDoAP. MnDoAP is the acronym for Mutual Defense and Optional Aggression Pacts that have a non-chaining clause in them, (here's an example of a non-chaining clause).
The non-chaining clause is put into some MDoAP or MADP's so that if one
signatory assists another alliance via a separate treaty, the treaty
with the non-chaining clause becomes optional. These are used to limit
to expansion of conflicts if people don't want to be involved for one
reason or another.They are one step above MDP's and one step below MADP's on the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties
Mutual Defense Pacts (often referred to as MDP's) are a
type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances agree to
defend each other from attack by other alliances.There is also a variant of the MDP and you may see it sometimes as MnDP. MnDP is the acronym for Mutual Defense Pacts that have a non-chaining clause in them, (here's an example of a non-chaining clause).
The non-chaining clause is put into some MDoAP or MADP's so that if one
signatory assists another alliance via a separate treaty, the treaty
with the non-chaining clause becomes optional. These are used to limit
to expansion of conflicts if people don't want to be involved for one
reason or another.MDP's are one step above ODP's and one step below MDoAP's on the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties.
Mutual Defense Pacts (often referred to as MDP's) are a
type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances agree to
defend each other from attack by other alliances.There is also a variant of the MDP and you may see it sometimes as MnDP. MnDP is the acronym for Mutual Defense Pacts that have a non-chaining clause in them, (here's an example of a non-chaining clause).
The non-chaining clause is put into some MDoAP or MADP's so that if one
signatory assists another alliance via a separate treaty, the treaty
with the non-chaining clause becomes optional. These are used to limit
to expansion of conflicts if people don't want to be involved for one
reason or another.MDP's are one step above ODP's and one step below MDoAP's on the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties.
Optional Defense Pacts (often referred to as ODP's) are
a type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances may
optionally defend each other if attacked, though such action is not
required as it would be for a MDP. In practice, ODP's often function as ToA's. One variation of an ODP is the Optional Defense and Aggression Pact (oDAP/ODoAP/ODAP),
wherein an alliance may both optionally defend another if attacked and
optionally participate in aggressive actions with other signatories.They are one step above ToA's and one step below MDP's on the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties.
Treaties of Amity (often referred to as ToA's) are a
type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances agree to
close bonds of friendship and to provide economic aid or military
defense in certain circumstances. ToA's differ from MDP's in that aid and war remain optional, rather than mandatory.The NADC announced the first Treaty of Amity on September 2006. However, after the widespread use of the ToA as a replacement to the NAP, the NADC
invented a new variation of the Treaty of Amity they dubbed "Amity and
Cooperation Treaty" (ACT). It incorporates elements from both a Treaty
of Amity and a PIAT.TOA's are one step above PIAT's and one step below ODP's on the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties.
Peace, Intelligence and Aid Treaties (often referred to as PIAT's)
are a type of interalliance treaty wherein the signatory alliances
agree to peaceful coexistence, to share intelligence as necessary, and
to provide aid under certain circumstances.PIAT's are one step above NAP's and one step below ToA's on the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties.
A Non Aggression Pact or NAP is an agreement by which
multiple alliances agree to coexist peacefully and not attack each
other. NAPs are often the basis for declarations of neutrality, which are virtual worldwide NAPs.Non Aggression Pacts are generally the second weakest type of interalliance treaty in the Cyberverse. On the Spectrum of Interalliance Treaties, they are one step above a ToF and one step below a PIAT.
-
I'm sure some chest beating will start but hey just my opinion. Let's stick to the map.
-
Actually to be fair a lot of alliances contain good fighters. Everyone gets one in the head on occasion. The art seems to be deciding who is the best domino toppler and then aligning with them. Some alliances just have a survival instinct that overcomes human loyalty.
-
Added TTK
-
Nukes free. Good luck guys.
NpO-NSO War Map
in World Affairs (IC)
Posted
Gephi graphing is good.
Is this acceptable for Die Link?