LordAkanata
-
Posts
178 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by LordAkanata
-
-
You guys really should of just accepted white peace, your doing a lot more damage to yourselves then your dishing out to IS.
In pixels or PR? They're taking a lot of damage to the former, but none to the latter.
-
I think I shall enjoy watching The Popcorn War. Hope everyone involved enjoys it.
You'll find more people are involved than you think in a while.
-
You know, before you posted this I didn't advocate the rolling of Pink Sphere.
But now I do. Congratulations. Way to make an enemy of (almost) everyone, but at least you know who your friends are I suppose.
-
o/ CG
With superheroes like these, what are the villains like? Send them away, boys!
-
ill try my best
tl;dr
CG; were getting owned! reps plx
World; ebil IS!
IS; no wai it was just a raiddddd!!
Rad; ya man a raid
PC; totally a raid
World; dude thats totally not a raid CMs/Airforce/Navy/Spais
IS; okay w/e they dont have treaties
Rad; dude it was totally a raid, i use those things all, the time
World; HYPROCRIT BUS DOCTRINE MEANS NOTHING
Rad; lolwut
IS; we make our own raiding policies jerks!
Fort Pitt; Your in direct contradiction of your own policies on raiding IS *evidence*
IS; err.....
TC; WERE COMING AT UPDATE WATCHOUT BUT SHHHHHHH ITS A SEKRIT!
tell me if i missed anything
Yeah, that's about right. The last couple pages just has been recycled material of old.
-
See the underlined, as I had asked above, anything more than 2 GA's is an attack, not a raid. IS's raiding guidelines confirm that they also believe this.
http://is.ipbfree.com/index.php?showtopic=8 (you don't need to be masked to see it)
This incident looks like IS is providing massive military assistance, against their tech raiding policy. Once again confirming that this isn't a raid, it's war.
Also, why am I arguing with RAD members? Where did all the IS people go?
-
I'd just like to reiterate that IS sets its own raiding policy.
When people have only your word to go on that something is a tech raid, despite the facts, there's something clearly wrong. We know the community doesn't support naked aggression from the example of the Karma War, and that's what this looks like, despite what you say.
Sure, let IS have its policy. But IS will have to pay for it in the end. If people are ready to declare war on you at any moment because of your policy, then you should consider changing said policy.
-
More like profit. That's what a raid is.
Dude, as much as you and Emperor Marx want to believe otherwise, I know what a raid is. This isn't a tech raid, a land raid, whatever. How many times do we have to go over this point? Tech raids don't use CM's, use air attacks, launch naval blockades, and certainly do not spy nukes away.
If you'd like to just blow other people's pixels up, expect yours to burn in return.
-
So, this is going on 26 pages. I refuse to go back and read all of it. I just wanna know. whats gonna be done about this. Are alliances gonna try to attack IS and come to CGs defense?
You'd better believe it. I read all 26 pages and still have no idea what IS's CB was for this war, so what choice does the world have but to conclude naked aggression was the reason?
-
Well, tech raids don't need a reason beyond the desire to accumulate tech. And that's universally known for tech raids - the whole point, is to gain tech.
You're calling it a tech raid, while Rey's calling it a "raid" as in military raid. I'm quite sure your side is lacking a consistent story for the world.
-
It's a raid. Stop crying.
A tech raid is an act of war on a sovereign alliance. What you're calling a "raid" is war, period. I don't see how this gets you out of your stealth war, or give a reason why you don't need a DoW.
-
Then you have no room to say anything.
This. I can put up with ignorance, but willful ignorance is totally different. If you can't be bothered with simple facts, Druss, then why should people listen to your account of events?
-
Most people wait till update to blitz.
Quite true. I await update then.
-
I'm assuming you haven't read this entire thread, now have you?
Not to goad you, since I'm on your side on this, but you probably should be posting a DoW soon before people stop taking you seriously.
-
My point being that many alliances have actually started or gone into wars they would certainly lose. It's only alliances like yours that can't fathom what it's like to actually stand up for yourself.
This. Well said Random.
There's also the noCB War (or WotC or SPW, depending on who you are). Just because the treaty web was going to kill the Blue Sphere didn't mean BLEU didn't fight. And a good fight it was.
IS, your CB is even worse than GGA and Valhalla's CB. Naked aggression will be punished in the New Era.
-
I'm rather under the impression that CG is calling it a tech raid, perhaps to gain forum sympathy or simply because of the absence of a DoW. In any case, i would wait for IS to clarify the situation before jumping into early conclusions.
Nope. IS tried calling it a tech raid to keep this atrocity quiet, but CG and most people hear see this attack for the war that it is.
I'm not going to argue about tech raiding; you do as you want with unaligneds. But giving an alliance a full-scale blitz for merely criticizing them is extremely low, and I'll love smelling their tech and infra burning over my skies.
-
A galactic standard week ended something less then 5 hours ago.
Your probation is over with.
o/ Tolkien the Merciful
-
I pray to Admin that Blunity can bring some sanity to this planet over the next year.
No idea where you got this idea. Do you honestly think that after WotC and Agora that you have ANY standing with us? Just saying again, Karma's a !@#$%*.
As for the reps, OV would be crazy to not use these reps as a juicy recruitment tool. And then more slots for NPO. B)
-
In other news, Electron Sponge retains his position as Admiral of the Iceberg Floatilla as no candidates were allowed to challenge him.
This is outrageous. I demand my vote back!
o/ GR
-
o/ Athens, and may this not be the last milestone you reach.
-
Happy birthday Shroomies!
-
We share membership so FoB may share the booty.
o/ FoB
o/ C&G
-
Yea it kinda is, you can't remove somebody from a position they are not occupying.
No, it's not. Isn't it clear that Caffine was basically pushed out of Echelon? Isn't it clear that in the past, people subject to these terms tend to leave the alliance? Isn't it clear that forcing people to leave alliances breaks communities?
-
Has anyone stopped and asked Echelon if they even WANTED Caffine back in government BEFORE getting worked up? I am under the impression that Echelon really didn't haggle much over this particular point.
If Echelon wanted to expel Caffine, they would have made a separate announcement about the matter. The fact that his prohibition from government is in the terms suggests that the alliances at war with Echelon (or some of them anyway) wanted him gone. They're imposing their will on Echelon about who can be in government or not, and that's just not cool.
New Declaration
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
o/ Invicta
Right makes might.