LordAkanata
-
Posts
178 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by LordAkanata
-
-
I laughed extremely hard when I read this. BRILLIANT political move.
o/ C&G
-
This isn't the end. Not even the beginning of the end. The end of the beginning maybe.
This. All parties involved will be seeing more combat soon, I guarantee you.
Also, glad to see this trainwreck end sensibly.
-
I was referring to our 1V and Q allies; I was referring to you in that Polar's peacing out \m/ and PC kind of leaves STA, GR and NSO in the cold and on their own. Nice job of sticking by your allies there, Zombie.
You really don't seem to know what side of the war we're on, Moo. GR wasn't even in this until YOUR allies hit us for no apparent reason.
-
Is this a secret clause of the treaty, or just supposed to be unwritten but understood?
It's actually directly written in the Harmlin Accords. This is a supremacy clause if I've ever seen one:
b. Should any alliance or group which has a treaty with any Härmlin, plan or perform aggressive action towards another Härmlin, the pact with the foreign party will be made null and void and all Härmlin will stand united in repelling the aggressor.o/ Harmlins
-
Friends without treaties > treaties without friends.
o/ Harmlins
-
I don't see how ANY treaty chain got you to declare on us. Whatever. Goodbye IRON.
-
At some point, you're going to raid GPA and realize that that was a terrible mistake.
To our allies in Poison Clan and their allies and their allies, allow me to thank you for the great honor of fighting with you side by side.
Good luck hanging onto your delusion that most people on your "side" are fighting on your behalf. You really need to realize that whatever the outcome of this war, YOU LOSE.
-
This seems happy.
o/ Vanguard
-
Destruction of communities masqueraded as tech raiding.
Larger, well connected alliances ganging up on alliances that have just lost a treaty, or have had no opportunity to establish one.
This doesn't describe the situation with \m/ and NpO. However, it does sound like what \m/ did to FoA to get this whole ball rolling.
EDIT: can't spell at night.
-
I'd been asked to stop posting while discussion with WF continues, however to prove im no liar, here is your screenshot:
Even if the message is legit, Marcus Brutus isn't WF gov, so he can't offer peace for them. So the offer is void. Got it?
-
I'm sure PZI is acceptable for a rogue attack. Talk to me when you get rid of the P from the sentence.
Edit: Never mind, looks like you did.
-
so since none of us know wabout the situation, i guess we can guess. Here's mine: you went to negotiate something with \m/, failed, saw a racial slur and found a psuedo-victory by being an $@! about things that you really could just brush off. right?
No, based on what I hear a more likely timeline is like this:
- Grub goes to \m/ about their tech-raiding policy
- \m/embers make off-color remarks about Grub
- Grub is offended, and thus sees \m/ negotiating in bad faith
- Grub leaves and gets Polaris ready for war
The entire discussion about what's offensive and what's not is pretty moot. It's just a stupid idea to do anything possibly offensive around someone who isn't a friend.
- Grub goes to \m/ about their tech-raiding policy
-
Not sure why you would tech-raid ANY established alliance, but ok, have it your way.
-
If you make the conscious choice to cozy up with two opposing blocs, that's your own problem, not your allies'.
No, it really isn't. The blocs in the next war formed well after this treaty, and for that matter most treaties were signed. Strong allies stick with their friends in wartime. The alternative is ignoring half your treaties, which makes you look like a jerk, or sitting out the war in neutrality, which IMO still makes you look like a jerk.
Regardless, sad to see old bonds unfurled. Good luck to both parties.
-
Take a closer look at your last MoT election.
Oh hai there Arsenal. Whoops.
-
How's your Minister of Trains doing? Non-existent? Yeah, that's why you should have elected me again.
Dunno what you're talking about Drai, you're still Minister of Trains.
o/ GR
-
Thanks CnG for saving LEO
We aim to please.
o/ C&G
-
While I agree with the sentiment, don't try to hide that you declared many hours before the peace deal. I'm not going to hail a common rogue like you.
-
oh lookie!
A raid target!
find a protector as soon as you canLooks like you people missed this:
Good luck to you sir.
-
Well I just got an offer from him. Thanks for confirming my suspicions. B)
-
Today is an excellent day. To great friends! (Especially ones armed to the teeth. )
o/ MK
o/ NpO
-
This is the start of something wonderful.
o/ NpO
o/ IAA
-
What a joke, your protectorate is attacked and you offer moral support.Where are all the DoWs I was promised?
I believe Hell Scream answered why we have a DoS and not a DoW.
We're currently discussing peace, again. Thanks to Doitzel, he's trying to prevent more DoWs. -
It's like a game of chess, you don't usually want to make the first move.
No, I'm pretty sure white has a slight advantage in chess. Try chicken instead for an analogy.
Two different wars
in Open World RP
Posted
There's that little problem where the preemptive attack backfires. Then what?