Jump to content

Alterego

Members
  • Posts

    5,171
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alterego

  1. To be fair, France hasn't been much of an ally since the American Revolution.

    The France/America thing is mostly an myth pushed by the media in both countries because both nations are world powers they like to be seen as independent and making their own decisions. France fought very hard in WW1 and have a bad rep because of weak politicians in WW2. In WW2 the Free French army fought very hard with the British in North Africa and up through Europe showing no mercy to the Germans. They stood with the US against USSR/Russia all through the cold war and were there again for Gulf War 1 and have been in Afghanistan for years. I think you will find them a much better ally to the US as almost any other nations. That is just the overt stuff and Im sure behind the scenes things are much closer than you would believe.

  2. I don't really think anyone underestimates the gramlins, people learned of their war skill in GW3. they are in

    Citadel and Q. i think most know how green they would glow if they messed with gramlins.

    Everyone knows they are a very strong alliance, but I would go even further and say they are as close to perfect as an alliance can get (besides IRON). In that context I would say they are underrated.

  3. The problem with war for wars sake is... what exactly?

    For all I know RNU looked at these guys wrong - I don't care, it's a balanced war between refreshingly untied groups.

    It's pathetic that a small alliance with no ties can't declare on another small alliance and have a legitimate, one on one, war without people seeking to intervene or otherwise grill them like it actually matters.

    Seconding this.

    You admit now, contrary to what you said before that it is not a legitimate war and it is just war for wars sake.

    You squeeze the life out of this game when you make it impossible for alliances to interact, or even post, without protection because someone, somewhere might take issue with a war that they have no ties to.

    Grow up, please.

    Insulting people who have a different opinion to your own is not clever. Perhaps you should take your own advice and grow up.

  4. It's pathetic that a small alliance with no ties can't declare on another small alliance and have a legitimate, one on one, war without people seeking to intervene or otherwise grill them like it actually matters.

    I don't see any evidence of this war being legitimate and they have said they cant be bothered finding the evidence to back up their public DoW. I think its pathetic that people cant question a public DoW when the alliance in question refuses to provide the evidence to back up their public DoW.

  5. Your alliance has apparently never been attacked, but has carried out a series of tech raids. The only engagement other than this recent one which can possibly link your two alliances was your attack on them on the 19th of March. None of the nations you attacked have received aid from the RNU in the past 10 days. I can see no justification for this war, would you like to present us with some?

    I agree with this, you have been attacking RNU since the 19th.

  6. Seems a little harsh when you consider the fact they is a very young alliance and at first glance Elysium Pending looks like a two man alliance. Most people in CN have stated anything under 5 nations isn't a real alliance. I hope these guys get a fair hearing.

×
×
  • Create New...