Jump to content

o ya baby

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,146

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by o ya baby

  4. This Week in the Network

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted · Edited by o ya baby

    That would be great actually :awesome:

    My apologies if you were actually physically unable to intervene.

    I don't think it's physically possible for me to do that, even if I wanted to, considering with everything sold except technology, which I can't get rid of, I'm still ranked like 14th.  So, physically impossible for me to actually catch them staggering him, sans sitting here for 24 hours a day refreshing waiting to catch one at a random time during the day rebuying.  ;)

    It's okay, it looks like they're fresh out of nations who can even stagger him.

  5. This Week in the Network

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    Did just fine fighting one round of war then sitting back and watching Cuba get staggered for two months?

    I can't really stop them from buying into range and then selling down to avoid counters in the middle of the day.  Want me to magically reduce my NS enough to catch them at 140k ns or what?

  7. This Week in the Network

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted · Edited by o ya baby

    You're not seeing what should be readily apparent, to further assist you, look at GPA's anarchy statistics, and then the military(soldier count) of their top 30 or so. WTF actually was willing to fight on the ground, GPA will make any war with them in the upper levels entirely destructive.

    uhhhh, no.  As someone who fought them and didn't spectate, they were not willing to fight on the ground AT ALL.  They sold their soldiers immediately and turtledfrom the initial blitz to now. 

  8. This Week in the Network

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    In related news, Cuba has now dropped to #3 in tech and is dangerously close to #2 in NS.

    Cute, but it's not really a true indicator of NS, since he currently has 25 infrastructure. It appears they're justtt about out of nations to mindlessly throw at him for a sub 2k tech loss over the course of a week, so this looks like it's the extent of their damage. :smug:

  9. Sanctions!

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    You sanctioned me, if I was irrelevant that would not have occured. It is genuinely adorable you think you are somehow relevant though. I have a history of accomplishments and alliance positions longer than your average verbose post, please continue to behave as though you are an original and unique snowflake though, it proves my own theories about you.

    "Accomplishments"

    Let's not get ahead of ourselves, here. :smug:

  11. Producers vs Parasites 2: Types of Nations

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted · Edited by o ya baby

     

    We ran the numbers more times than any of us would like to admit and I'm telling you we would have ran a clinic on IRON's top tier.

     

    As much as Samus likes to explain the intricacies of  the Ramirus strat, the math was not on their side. As it stands, no one has ever convincingly defeated a top 5-level DBDC nation. 

     

    The most comparable nation to ours in recent memory that was dismantled was BooNetherlands who both gave early into war and wouldn't get far past top 15 in DBDC stats wise.  Even he required Umb's rank 1 fireteam.

     

    And IRON was not in shape to reliably attempt this.  Even now it would still be pretty convincing in a 1v1.

     

    Just like I said in the other thread this is straight up wrong.  TOP doesn't like us because we didn't play to their tune so you spin it to say we were trying to "preserve stats".  Pay attention to how these wars turn out and you'll realize there is zero fear of stat loss.  We gain regardless if you play your little hearts out or not.

     

    edit spelling

    I was on that initial fireteam that took down BooNetherlands :smug:

    I still have all of those screens saved.

     

     

    Yeah, but who cares about that? The only thing worth watching there are the ratios DBDC put up on neutrals that haven't even logged in.

    Oh, and just saw this gem.  You realize every single one of them, besides one, logged in and fought back the entire week, correct? And the one that didn't logged in day 5 and fought back.  Just because we're better than you at this and can mitigate damage taken doesn't mean they aren't fighting back.  But keep on talking about something you know nothing about. :smug:

  12. GPA Nation DoWed?

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted · Edited by o ya baby

    ... :smug:

    I thoroughly enjoyed reading all of your theories and strategies on how to take me down.  Most of which were incredibly wrong, and a tiny few which made some sense.  None of which would've actually worked, but I applaud the effort regardless.

  16. The next DBDC raid target

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    "Our guy flipped his !@#$. Our bad."

    Come on, guys, you're better than this. Don't have oyb frothing at the mouth then have the damned nerve to say Dajobo is posturing.


    I don't think you understand what posturing means. But alright. Call it what you want.

    This topic is not failing to deliver.

  18. The next DBDC raid target

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    A stern talking to?

     

    For what, exactly? For speaking out against DBDC? Is that a problem now? This isn't the first time I've seen DBDC threaten those who speak out against them with attacks on their alliances top tier. Guess what - you're acting in a manner that deserves to be called out. You crave attention and you seek it. So, why, when we provide you with said attention do you being frothing at the mouth about being so offended by it? You attack alliances for no reason and then pretend to be the good guy - but yet, apparently speaking out against that is such an utter crime. I really don't understand this logic behind discouraging political discourse. If you wish to have a quiet world where everyone praises you, go be GPA. Clearly you've chosen another path, so I'm completely confused by your anger with those who disagree with you. I would honestly expect you to enjoy coming out and debating your actions with us.

     

    And guess what: nobody told us anything. Keep dreaming that you can influence Polar's IA matters. This isn't IRON, or any of those other alliances that you raided that now grovel at your feet.

     

    And this is why we love Dajobo.

     

    There's no comparison between the two. NPO was - and is - a political alliance. They made actions based on a long term plan, carried it out with force, and with a squad of mouthpieces here on these forums. I have to admit, those were great times. DBDC is just another alliance contributing to the devolution of the political world.

     

    I was not around for that, and I imagine not many in our government were - but in major alliance wars, there have rarely been declarations when assisting an ally who needs help. The last time I led a real alliance into war, Guns of Glory, we destroyed CIS, and then got caught by about 10 more alliances without even so much as a message. The same thing happened to us when we founded Vox. More recent wars have been much better about this, as far as I know. I guess the chaos is a little more organized now.

     

    Not justifying Polar's previous actions, just stating that there never has been large scale attacks on large alliances, not part of a larger war, without even so much as an acknowledgement. I'm sure you understand that distinction as well.

    Don't worry brah.  I'll be coming for Polar's top two nations when I get my 25 nukes back.  You've got about 10 days to figure something out.  Here's my acknowledgement for you.  :smug:

  19. Complacency

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    According to #thestruggle, it's Infra>Warchest>DailyIncome>DailyBills>Casualties>TechSlots>EMP>Friends

    I'm gonna have to agree with this.  I'm definitely going through #thestruggle and nothing is more important to me than infrastructure.

  23. Acts of Terrorism

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    yeah freaking right Mr Big shot! Special needs children like you need you egos fed so you don't go around crying and stomping on normal more well adjusted kids. Big baby why don't you quit pooping on yourself and maybe the little fellas will quit laughing at you.

    I love you too, baby.  There's enough of me to go around.

  24. Acts of Terrorism

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by o ya baby

    What is most amusing is how DBDC is trying to pretend that they expected Pax Corvus to fight back, and that this didn't blow up in their faces.

    I can assure you we all expected them to fight back and went into this knowing that.  I don't think you realize that not everyone in this world is afraid of getting their hands dirty and actually fighting someone.  I was hoping they'd fight back.  I enjoy war.

    Keep on patting yourself on the back and pretending like you know what's going on tho, it's pretty cute. :smug:

  25. Acts of Terrorism

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    I can't wait.  Will you be brave enough to post a DoW this time, or will you come begging for a gentleman's agreement about escalation again?  Or will you leave it to Generalchow to come ask for no nukes?  Truly terrifying prospects.

    I don't need a DoW.  I'm attacking your nations.  Do something about it.  I'm already telling you what I'm going to do.  You could just run to your allies now and have me attacked.  But you won't do that, nor will you do anything after I attack them.  Plain and simple.

    All bark, no bite.

×
×
  • Create New...