Jump to content

Zulchep

Members
  • Posts

    330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Zulchep

  1. So the Minister of Foreign Affairs that has been elected to represent their alliance with others is not worth talking to in STA's negotiations? Very well, then. Thank you for bringing this particular viewpoint of the STA to light. I'm sure it will help other alliances as well as our own when they communicate with you in the future.

    Minister of Foreign Affairs =/= "If STA felt that they were getting nowhere with our Firm, then perhaps they should have asked to speak with someone else who might be less hotheaded about the issue."

    Someone else = non-government = mouthpiece

  2. lolWAPA

    Also, I am looking forward to their side of the story, I could always use some laughter.

    Probably something along the lines of "OMFG they were sooo meeeean they put us under their devastatingly hard probation of three months with only two nukes each and we couldn't techraid aligned nations or white team or aqua or red and they're just sooo oppressive and mean!111"

  3. ...how isn't it political, Terry? They attacked our protectorate. We gave them every chance to back out of this peacefully, as did Cascadia. They chose to respond with sarcasm and mockery.

    They knew very well the consequences of their actions.

  4. Gone are the times of a good political based discussion as when one even starts to resemble one you have the bigger powers in CN flaming and trolling to derail the topic.

    Funny you should say that, sweetie, considering that you've been doing it all night.

  5. Ah, no, if you'll see what you said was that "STA does not stand for unprovoked aggression" which is exactly what a techraid is. So what you meant was that "STA does not stand for techraids on aligned nations, who we hold as privileged."

    And until yesterday Rayvon was "a none" and before that Mirima was "a none" and at one point you were "a none" so I fail to really see what you're insinuating by "Ah, a none."

    I don't have any real issue with techraiding, but if you're going to make a moral stance, let's make sure it's actually where you stand.

    Mirima can drop off the face of CN for all I care, and I rather hope she does. :) I was a none for less than 24 hours. Rayvon is large enough and smart enough to hold his own and has enough friends to come to his defense should someone be dumb enough to attack him.

    If you are unaligned, you run the risk of getting your $@! handed to you in a techraid. It's one of the hazards of being unaligned. You can either have your "complete freedom," or you can have security. Take your pick.

    Would you like me to clarify? STA does not stand for unprovoked rogue actions against aligned nations. We've marched to war to defend a member of a 3-person alliance who was being raided and strong-armed into joining a larger alliance. Tech-raiding ceases to be tech-raiding once the person in question joins an alliance.

    Now as for Terry Howard, he is a borderline troll and quickly on his way to becoming the new walford.

  6. Please tell me that me that all who believe in truth, honor and all that is just will rise up and demand accountability.

    The longer we sit silent, the more we will see other imperialistic alliances forcing their defensive wills on these so-called protectorates.

    This will not be forgotten. This must not stand.

    o/ STA

    You're wanting cookies, aren't you?

    Yeah, I see how it is, Geo.

  7. Same reason as every one. Im addicted still and cold turkey aint much fun lol

    So...what? Are you walford v2.0, then? You don't want to quit, but you just sit around and whine about how everyone is so mean?

    Edit: Make that "don't want to quit."

  8. It matters little about my alliance in this thread for it was you who took this to that point not I. I only commented on a comment by another in this thread thats is all. But if you feel the need to talk on a different topic then that is up to you.

    Van Hoo its not High jacking when posting a comment on the situation at hand. And if no one cared then why keep having a pop about it? Just leave it.

    Ohhh, I get it. You're jealous that someone's actually honoring their treaties!

    It's okay, sweetheart, we understand. :)

  9. Well seeing i have gone to war with a treaty partner every time yes i would BUT your point you just tried to make fell on its face for it was my treaty partners that walked away from me in a time of war.

    Why do you need to DoW just aid the attacked members so they can kick some butt.

    What is the point of a protectorate? if you can look after your self when you start out wait till you can before you start an alliance.

    Zulchep this is not a direct attack at you or your alliance but it is becoming far to common for little wars like this.

    Hm, you're in my thread, insulting my alliance, so yes, it is a direct attack on us. Our protectorate came to us asking for help, and we are giving it to them. We tried to solve this diplomatically, and when that fell through from no fault of our own, we declared and attacked.

    Our reasons and cause are just, as are our actions. Your words are malicious and filled with nothing but anger over your failed alliance and your failed nation. I cannot blame any allies you had from walking away. I'm honestly surprised you had any in the first place.

  10. Yes it does for going to war with a 9 man alliance is very hard work these days.

    What was that? I'm sorry, I didn't realize it was a crime to protect our...protectorate. Honor and upholding treaties, y'know.

    But you know all about that, right, Terry? :)

×
×
  • Create New...