Jump to content

daggarz

Members
  • Posts

    594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by daggarz

  1. [center][img]http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/7622/smalleruq.jpg[/img][img]http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9637/honourflag.jpg[/img]

    It is my great honour to present this protectorate treaty between Nemesis and Honour to the denizens of planet bob.[/center]

    [quote][center][b]Nemesis – Honour Protectorate Treaty[/b][/center]

    [b]Preamble:[/b]
    The alliances of Nemesis and Honour enter into this agreement in the spirit of mutual friendship and respect and with the intent to honour those values above all.

    [b]Article I – Non-aggression:[/b]
    Both parties agree not to commit acts of aggression upon the other party. Such acts include, but are not limited to, direct wars against a signatory, aiding those in direct wars against a signatory and espionage against a signatory.

    [b]Article II – Information and Intelligence:[/b]
    Should either signatory have information relating to the security of the other signatory they are obligated to provide the intelligence to the other party with no delay. Honour shall endeavour to provide Nemesis with notice of any treaty signings in advance.

    [b]Article III – Protection:[/b]
    An attack on Honour is an attack on Nemesis, and will be treated as such. Nemesis must be informed of any offensive war from Honour at least 48 hours in advance. Nemesis is not required to defend Honour from any response to such a war but retains the right to do so.

    [b]Article IV – Reciprocation:[/b]
    Honour is encouraged, but not obligated, to assist Nemesis in a defensive conflict. Were Nemesis to declare an offensive war, Honour retains the option to assist in the conflict.

    [b]Article V – First Option Tech Deals:[/b]
    Should either signatory find they have an excess amount of tech sellers after dealing internally, the other party shall be offered the first option on the deals. Similarly, should either signatory find they cannot purchase enough tech internally, they shall seek out a seller from the other party first and foremost.

    [b]Article VI – Amendment and Cancellation:[/b]
    Any amendments to this document are to be made by mutual consent. This treaty will be reviewed for it’s suitability in 60 days time. Either party may withdraw from this treaty with 120 hours notice. All articles of this treaty remain active during the 120 hour period.


    Signed:
    [b]For Nemesis[/b]
    Triumvirate: Daggarz, T-O-P, and Poyples
    Minister of Internal Affairs: Kataklizm the Great
    Minister of Defense: Bob Ilyani
    Minister of Economic Affairs: Flessen
    Minister of Foreign Affairs: Amossio

    [b]For Honour[/b]
    Director - Rikky1116
    Deputy Director - Diego
    and Members of the Congress[/quote]

    TL;DR Nemesis is protecting Honour

  2. And for those of you now calling us out? Do your worst. This isn't some bloated egotistical alliance. We are Nemesis.

    Our minister is accused, he is innocent. Even without the proof he is a friend of mine and I will defend him at his word to zi and back anyday, you think that's dishonourable? You can blow me.

  3. Jumping at the bit? Hoo I assure you, if we were rolling to war, I would not be caring about a treaty the enemy had.

    What has in fact happened is that we wanted some sort of retribution for wrongs done us, you and your friend top were talking, you said it might be funny if multiple peopled cancelled bla bla he wanted to know if that was going ahead..

    You came on the owf started saying your friend was eager for you to cancel their treaty.. Honestly it doesn't matter, don't do it for all I care but the accused member I believe was probably a friend of yours once before and you can understand that he is pissed off

  4. [quote name='Logan' date='31 May 2010 - 10:01 AM' timestamp='1275260445' post='2317130']
    His point was that Penkala is upholding the status quo of taking jabs at the alliance of the month rather than being a novel thinker and fighting against the established norms like he is saying. But if he wants to act bigger than Jesus that's his prerogative, but its incredibly annoying.
    [/quote]

    All Penkala did was try to make a funny, he failed.
    That !@#$ happens all the tiiiiiiiime.
    Now if you remember my blueballs thread from the noDOW war, that was cash!

  5. [quote name='Dochartaigh' date='20 May 2010 - 12:38 PM' timestamp='1274319494' post='2304007']
    daggarz, with all the love i can muster, are you seriously stuck on something that is completely optional? now if LoSS had signed a mandatory defensive clause, i could see all the issues with that. but this is optional and who knows if it will ever actually go anywhere. if it does, then i am sure LoSS will discuss that with ya'll. to throw away a long relationship (even symbolically) for something like this is just ridiculous.

    honestly, you want to repair the relationship with LoSS by running their FA for them. how sweet.
    [/quote]

    No. I want to repair the relationship by being put ina position where I can safely do so for my alliance and its direction

×
×
  • Create New...