Jump to content

Hunterman1043

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    804

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Hunterman1043

  3. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    We were awaiting a response for about a week now. Then I heard rumor that "WFF deleted the forum" which is false. No one has changed the embassy in any way, I triple checked the admins panel. The diplomat hasn't logged in since Jan 12, 2015 10:59 pm, leaving us on a cliffhanger. I don't blame him personally for this breakdown, I am sure he is busy with other stuff. Perhaps sending more than one diplomat to chat with us before making such a hasty decision could have been wise.

     

    I mean what do they care, to them you guys are lower than the scum under their boots.

  4. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Hunterman1043

    I'm sorry, what?

    Just a few posts ago you admitted to having talked to Fark's FA team. Why do you think he was there?

    So tell me this, how would you see this being diplomatically resolved? Difficulty: Just saying that Fark should accept you doing what you've been doing can't be considered a diplomatic resolution.

     

    5153886E321141700203410239488_30f7c4241d

  6. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Hunterman1043

    We can handle it, just wish they could handle this diplomatically first.

     

    I kinda like gopherbashi's quote, it's related: "I sometimes feel like peace talks are two people bashing their heads against the same wall until they both mutually agree that it is not enjoyable."

     

    Here is some mood music, we can call this our song Fark :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTOQUnvI3CA

     

    I feel ya, well if y'all don't want the war aid, perhaps move them over to be 6/100 tech deals? :D

  8. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Think of a tech deal as a contract and imagine what we are feeling as we had paid for that tech fulfilling our end of the contract. If those nations didn't aid the tech that is owed, we would be pretty bummed out about it and try to collect what is owed. HOWEVER, if we had found out that they were pressured into not fulfilling their contract by an alliance we are at war or some other outside party with then we would go above and beyond to hammer in those nails against them.

  9. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Hunterman1043

    Some folks love to call DBDC bullies, but really, what else can you call this overreaction by Fark? Yesterday, according to my quick eyeball check of their alliance aid screen, DT alone had active tech deals as a buyer with the following alliances:

     

    WTF, GOP, NPO, R&R, VE, NG, TSK, MW, Atlas, tJL, Reavers, TSC, SLAP, aNiMaLz, War Pigs, Riot Society, HRE, CoIS, TIA, Viking Swords, Entente and WFF.

     

    But, hell, let's narrow that down to just the active deals as of yesterday where they were in the "receiving tech" stage instead of the "sending aid" phase of it:

     

    WTF, GOP, VE, MW, tJL, TSC, SLAP, aNiMaLz, War Pigs, Riot Society, CoIS, TIA and WFF.

     

    What about the other alliances at war with Fark? NoR has received tech from GATO and War Pigs. GLoF has received tech from TTK, aNiMaLz, Sengoku, Limitless Nexus, War Pigs, UCR, SRA, and Vae Victis. ODN has received tech from VE, The Sovereign Order and DEFCON 1. DS has received tech from Kashmir, aNiMaLz, TIF and Aztech.

     

    So, really, here's the full 25-alliance list: WTF, GOP, VE, MW, GATO, TTK, Sengoku, tJL, TSC, Kashmir, SLAP, aNiMaLz, War Pigs, Limitless Nexus, UCR, SRA, Vae Victus, Riot Society, The Sovereign Order, DEFCON 1, TIF, Aztech, CoIS, TIA and WFF.

     

    Which of these things is not like the other? Oh, WFF was the weakest one with six members and exactly one wonder (a recently-purchased stock market) to their names? Wow. They must really by pumping out a ton of aid to DT to merit this kind of singling-out, huh? Oh, they only had active tech deals with five DT nations, three of whom were out of range of Fark, and the other two of whom received a total of 200 tech each? Oh. I guess that really does merit smacking them around, huh? They were definitely the one alliance out of the 25 listed above who were just making an incredible difference.

     

    An awful lot of folks in this coalition like Fark, and another large group of folks in this coalition respect their military capability, so Fark ended up getting a pretty decent match-up compared to Polar. Obviously, they've decided that this gives them the leeway to go on the offensive, which is reasonable. The fact that they've decided to do so by bullying the absolute weakest tech selling micro they could find is ridiculous.

     

    No one could have said it better.

     

     

    Providing material support to an opponent has been viewed as a hostile act since this game began.  Not quite sure why this memo is only getting here now.

     

    Idk about you but I've always been able to continue tech dealing during war with no issues... Both as a seller and as a buyer. We don't see it as support though because it is a fair swap. People are just butthurt because we are so tech heavy.

  12. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    To be honest not sure why the two of us are still arguing the matter man. It's just falling on death ears and whatever we say won't make a difference. WFF this bit is for you guys. You need rebuild aid after message me I will donate some aid slots for you.

     

    Exactly. Aid slots coming y'alls way.

     

    [OOC]Read my edited post though, I think I made the point better.[/OOC]

  13. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Hunterman1043

    From my non-FA and completely unofficial understanding. You (your alliance, no idea who was talked to) were asked multiple times to stop sending tech to DT and your [alliance] response was, "hold on, let me see if I can have more of my members find DT nations to send tech to."

    That's when you chose sides and that's when your acts of war were acted upon. You'll note that smontag only attacked nations with active aid slots sending tech to DT.

     

    While I as well do not know what happened behind closed doors do know that our (loosely used here) position is for the freedom of whom to tech deal with during war. Those aid slots were CLEARLY used for tech dealing and correctly documented as such in the reason for aid. This is just egregious and an overreach of boundaries for the sole purpose of looking for nations in range to target.

  14. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Hunterman1043

    Omg, I see it now. This is just an elaborate plan to convert tech sellers from our side of the sphere to the other.

     

    "Oh hey man, I don't like you dealing tech with those undesirables... I'm going to beat the !@#$ out of you until you quit sending tech..... But hey man listen, I know you are probably pissed right now, but you do know you could probably find a group of buyers who value their tech sellers...... Ya know man, I got it. Why don't you come deal with us because we are better.......... Yea, that's it bro! We will make sure you don't get attacked.... Yea sure. DO NOT DEAL WITH THOSE UNDESIRABLES ANYMORE OR OTHERWISE YOU WILL FACE THE CONSEQUENCES! Ehhhhh, maybe. Don't wanna scare you away or anything. We have cookies!!! :D"

     

    * NEWS FLASH *

     

    Go $%&@ yourselves. Get your own.

  15. The FARKLAND war

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Considering DBDC has threatened and authorized attacks on RIA tech sellers through their badlands sub AA, perhaps you shouldn't throw stones.  :smug:


    Maybe y'all should see us as separate entities with separate opinions on how to handle situations. Also, I'm not familiar with that policy and this is the first I am hearing about it. Though, because we don't share forums, it is not surprising so I will pass any further comments as I am not informed.

  25. Recognition of Hostilities

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Hunterman1043

    They weren't. We've been tracking DBDC deals for a while now and very rarely do they ever send anything out themselves. If you want to argue that...just ask them. They aren't ashamed to admit it.

     

    Also...3 mil for 100 tech? That's cruel and unusual punishment these days.

     

     

    Well good for you I guess. Also, 6 mil for 100 tech is a racket, I personally miss the 3x3. The sellers are still able to grow and prosper while sending out cheap tech they can afford. It's a win/win. You send out 4 payments of 6mil so they get a good boost and then receive 8 payments of 100 tech in return. I've known sellers that have done it from a new nation and end the deal at 5k infra ready to get out of selling tech. Y'all really must not know how to manage your money.

×
×
  • Create New...