Jump to content

manussa

Members
  • Posts

    143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by manussa

  1. I need two trades I have Uranium and coal as my resources. My current trades give me Gems, Marble, oil, silver and wine so any that are not them I am not fussy at the minute I am in Aqua team. inbox in game my nation link is http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=66397 this is a long term deal.

  2. Just for the record the guy attempted it once again on the ttk irc channel this morning. When he was challenged about the several wars and his defcon position ( TTK do not trade with unallied nations at war) he made an excuse that he was on the wrong channel and disappeared. As a member of the TTK government I relayed this information to our council. It has now come up that this has happened. It would appear that our friend here has not learned his lesson and is still attempting to pull tech scams.

  3. This amused me greatly if only because it allows for almost every CN meme to be used. I am guessing your calling out RoK government for an answer publically because either A... you like the attention of doing so OR B... You decided getting on IRC and querying a member of the Tri was just too much effort.

    I would recommend going to your protectors next time for advice before you publically embarass yourself or them considering they have chosen to look after you.

    I couldnt agree more

  4. We weren't on the list, but just like some others have said, if you have an issue with our diplomat, let me know and I will break a few of his fingers for good measure and give him a reason not to be able to type :unsure: lol. Needless to say, it won't happen twice.

    I do believe this refers to me. hides fingers just in case :huh:

  5. Unfortunately there is nothing that could be done once a member reaches quorum. TTK does not have a law to disband members running for council.

    Also it would seem that Mushroom Kingdom were aware of Rednecks return to TTK.

    Can I ask if anyone approached our government to see if we were willing for the time being to put rescrictions on him for the interest of diplomatic relations.

  6. You can understand why MK would be disappointed and/or fed up with the alliance's decision though. To be fair, you should have made sure he avoided gov for a while until things settled down again. By letting him back into gov so soon, whether he has changed or not, only creates unnecessary tension between you and your treaty partner. It was not the most intelligent move on your alliance's part.

    TTk has had a lot of new members since then meany of them unaware of the situation between your selves and redneck and the rest of us are not that petty to suggest voting on a member simply to cancel a treaty if you were that hated the government and priory would have called for this a long time ago. As I believe none of the orignal signitories of the treaty remain in TTK

  7. Wow, calling a former ally ignorant because I refuse to succumb to your demands? Yeah ok lets just agree to disagree and leave it at that. There really is no need for the childish insults though.

    Can I just point out that Redneck was democratically selected and elected to serve on our elder council. The Grand master does not choose the members of the elder council the alliance does. Had redneck been selected to serve as a marshal positions controlled by the grand master in the way he/she chooses them I can see this arguement. I know about the situation that occured a few months ago but what you are asking now is for a grand master to intervene in a democratic process thus turning TTK from a democracy to a dictatorship to suit the requests of one ally. TTK would have probably lost a lot more allies had we gone down that route. what you will have to do is look for those 19 voters who voted redneck onto the council and ask them why they did it. And I can tell you no grand master has that much away over the priory to pull off enough votes to get someone into council.

  8. to be honest, I fear that the alliance will not take the game seriously and you will only attract those who want a gay chat site. I joined CN to play the game not to sit with other gay people to discuss specifically gay topics whicn invariably happens when a group of gay people get together. You may have a tough time proving to CN that this is not what your alliance is about. Already through the names of your ministers shows me that this is the path you wish to travel down. Like I said I do wish you all the luck but as someone mentioned in this thread somewhere you may be hard pressed attracting experianced members who are here to play the game.

×
×
  • Create New...